SOPA and Internet Censorship

This forum is for members to discuss topics that do not relate to anime music videos.

Re: SOPA and Internet Censorship

Postby Emong » Thu Jan 19, 2012 1:18 pm

^ Oh I haven't really been following the SOPA debate so closely, which is why I used ambiguous terms like "often" and "a lot of". It's just something I noticed and wanted to comment on.
Image Image
User avatar
Emong
A Damaged Lemon
 
Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Location: The Jade Motel

Re: SOPA and Internet Censorship

Postby AceD » Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:21 pm

Internet wins: SOPA and PIPA both shelved

Just hours after Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) announced he was delaying a vote on the PROTECT IP Act, Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), the sponsor of the Stop Online Piracy Act, followed suit and announced he would be delaying consideration of the companion legislation.

“I have heard from the critics and I take seriously their concerns regarding proposed legislation to address the problem of online piracy," Smith said. "It is clear that we need to revisit the approach on how best to address the problem of foreign thieves that steal and sell American inventions and products."

"The Committee will continue work with both copyright owners and Internet companies to develop proposals that combat online piracy and protect America’s intellectual property," Smith continued. "We welcome input from all organizations and individuals who have an honest difference of opinion about how best to address this widespread problem." (He may want to check out our thoughts on the matter.)

Even former Senator Chris Dodd, the head of the Motion Picture Association of America, seemed to concede defeat. "With today’s announcement, we hope the dynamics of the conversation can change and become a sincere discussion about how best to protect the millions of American jobs affected by the theft of American intellectual property," he said in a statement. "It is incumbent that they now sincerely work with all of us to achieve a meaningful solution to this critically important goal."

The ideas present in both SOPA and PIPA may return, but both bills in their present form—and with their present names—are probably done for good.

A key figure in the fight against SOPA was Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA). Issa had planned to use his perch as chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee to highlight the flaws of SOPA's DNS blocking provisions. He was planning to hold a hearing featuring the testimony of actual technical experts, something that had been mysteriously missing from Smith's hearings on the bill. Wednesday's Internet protests were originally scheduled to coincide with the hearings. But Issa scrapped his hearing after receiving assurances that the DNS provisions would be dropped from SOPA. The broader protest went forward anyway.

"Supporters of the Internet deserve credit for pressing advocates of SOPA and PIPA to back away from an effort to ram through controversial legislation," Issa said in a Friday statement. "Over the last two months, the intense popular effort to stop SOPA and PIPA has defeated an effort that once looked unstoppable."

"Postponing the Senate vote on PIPA removes the imminent threat to the Internet, but it's not over yet," Issa continued. "Copyright infringement remains a serious problem and any solution must be targeted, effective, and consistent with how the Internet works."
User avatar
AceD
I AM THE BEST
 
Joined: 07 Dec 2002
Status: Lurking

Re: SOPA and Internet Censorship

Postby gotegenks » Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:47 pm

i feel like an extra in a movie :ying:
Image
User avatar
gotegenks
 
Joined: 03 Oct 2009
Location: charlesgood, california

Re: SOPA and Internet Censorship

Postby TEKnician » Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:28 am

RAWR RAWR! INTERNET BAD! RAWR RAWR! MUST EAT INTERNET! RAWR RAWR! :dino:

*shotgun to the head*
And that, kids, is how you play the game. :bear:
Almost as hard as fighting a Holy Paladin.
User avatar
TEKnician
 
Joined: 04 Mar 2010
Location: Smack in the middle of the Pacific Ocean
Status: Not reading the spoilers or manga

Re: SOPA and Internet Censorship

Postby TrufflePigStudios » Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:53 pm

I think SOPA is ridiculous personally. I've felt for years that copyright laws need to be re-written...but SOPA rewrites them in the opposite way. Copyrights are all about money...but art is so much more than that! Copyrights should be in place to ensure that the proper people receive credit for their art, not to place a wall around it so only a few people can enjoy it.

Don't get me wrong, I am not in favor of people being able to illegally download full movies and albums from the internet. But it seems to me most people who stream or download movies or tv shows do it more out of convenience than anything else. Instead of shutting down the internet they should focus on giving more support to sites like hulu or netflix that offer fast and convenient ways of watching video at a low cost.

People should have the right to use footage in a creative way as long as it isn't for a profit...sites like youtube shouldn't be allowed or forced to take down videos like that! Who is monetarily profiting from youtube? It isn't the users who post up a video of them singing a Gaga song, or amv creators like us. There are ads on every single one of my amv posts on youtube...who is getting the money from that because it certainly isn't me...so why should my videos be punished? That money should go towards the studios or artists or whoever created the content in my videos...and if that is how it works than why is there a problem? (I don't know how youtube works btw, so if I'm mistaken about any of this I apologize).

I feel like corporations are trying to push copyrights to the point of absurdity...what is next after the internet? You won't be able to hum or sing your favorite song because it is in violation of copryright laws? You won't be able to draw a picture of a favorite character? Write a poem or a story about something that inspired you? Artists have been building off each other for centuries and there is no reason why it should stop now! Some of Mozart's earliest pieces were variations on folk tunes or themes by his predecessors (like Bach), the final movement of Berlioz's Symphony Fantastique features a thundering Dies Irae chant in the bass (that he certainly did not create), Michaelangelo studied and copied the works of the classical sculptures in the libraries of the Vatican to be able to create the David- to be able to paint the ceiling on the Sistine Chapel, Edgar Allen Poe borrowed the rhythm and meter of Elizabeth Barrett's poem "Lady Geraldine's Courtship", there are countless movies (The Lion King, 10 Things I Hate About You, and many more I can't think of right now) that borrow the plot lines of Shakespeare's plays, Muse's albums feature piano interludes by Beethoven and introductions by Prokofiev. The artistic world has been copying itself for as long as its existed. So who is to keep young artists (young writers, musicians, and yes, I include amv creators in this category) from using the work of their predecessors to create something? How about we go back in time and impose copyright laws to this extremity...how much of the astounding works of art that we have today would never have been created? Art is moving in a new direction, into pixels and digital media...but that means that the rules and the government need to move with them...not stop them in their tracks.

Even putting the creativity and heart that these young artists put into their work aside...do corporations not realize that they are benefiting from free advertising?!! So often when I see a picture, a story, or an amv that I like that is fan created I get interested in the source. In the case of amvs especially I will look into the song artist and very often buy their album or buy a series used in an amv. If I hadn't seen that lovely piece of copyright violation I would never have known about the source art and gone out and purchased it. I understand a lot of people wouldn't go out and purchase something based on these means...but there are a lot of people who do, and they are cutting off awareness from that sector of the population who is otherwise ignorant to the art that they are marketing.

Even putting art aside...this bill is approached with its focus on the movie industry etc. But once it is in place what is stopping the government from using it for anything they want? The bill is overall too vague to be limited merely to the cinematic and music industry. First they're going to censor art...but what are they going to censor next?

Sorry for the rant, I get really worked up about SOPA o_o

And on a side note that lacks any real educated thought...why on earth are the pharmaceutical companies so behind this act? If I have learned nothing else from anime, it is that pharmaceutical companies are shady >_>
Image
User avatar
TrufflePigStudios
 
Joined: 01 Aug 2010

Re: SOPA and Internet Censorship

Postby Chained(E)Studio » Sat Jan 21, 2012 10:04 pm

TrufflePigStudios wrote:
People should have the right to use footage in a creative way as long as it isn't for a profit...sites like youtube shouldn't be allowed or forced to take down videos like that! Who is monetarily profiting from youtube? It isn't the users who post up a video of them singing a Gaga song, or amv creators like us. There are ads on every single one of my amv posts on youtube...who is getting the money from that because it certainly isn't me...so why should my videos be punished? That money should go towards the studios or artists or whoever created the content in my videos...and if that is how it works than why is there a problem? (I don't know how youtube works btw, so if I'm mistaken about any of this I apologize).


Youtube/Google tried. They got sued a few years ago over all the copywritted material on their site regardless of whether it was fair use or not. They tried fighting, and were even lucky enough to keep their users information away from it. Since the music industries also wanted everyone's information basically too. They had no choice but to agree/allow music industries/ other companies the right to take down their content. Even if some of it was fair use, because otherwise they couldn't keep Youtube up. I'm not sure all the details in this, but I believe that's most of the basics of it.
Image
User avatar
Chained(E)Studio
 
Joined: 14 Jul 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: SOPA and Internet Censorship

Postby Knowname » Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:07 am

If you do not think so... you will DIE
User avatar
Knowname
 
Joined: 16 Nov 2002
Location: Sanity, USA (on the edge... very edge)
Status: Indubitably

Re: SOPA and Internet Censorship

Postby aesling » Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:35 am

@TrufflePigStudios: you should read some of Lawrence Lessig's stuff. He has some really interesting things to say along those lines.
User avatar
aesling
Mad Scientist
 
Joined: 03 Feb 2005
Location: Wall Rose
Status: Human McNugget

Re: SOPA and Internet Censorship

Postby TrufflePigStudios » Sun Jan 22, 2012 1:22 am

Chained(E)Studio wrote:
Youtube/Google tried. They got sued a few years ago over all the copywritted material on their site regardless of whether it was fair use or not. They tried fighting, and were even lucky enough to keep their users information away from it. Since the music industries also wanted everyone's information basically too. They had no choice but to agree/allow music industries/ other companies the right to take down their content. Even if some of it was fair use, because otherwise they couldn't keep Youtube up. I'm not sure all the details in this, but I believe that's most of the basics of it.


Interesting, I didn't know that. I wonder if the artists themselves have any say in the matter, or if it is just the company that represents them. As someone who is making a career out of music, I would be happy if people were inspired to create something using my work. I understand that youtube would need to keep from getting sued though. I'm not trying to blame youtube, sites like them and google have been extremely against SOPA, so I'm pretty sure they understand the difference between piracy and fair use...I suppose it's the corporations who own the rights then who are trying to monopolize art?

@aesling- thanks, I'll look into it!
Image
User avatar
TrufflePigStudios
 
Joined: 01 Aug 2010

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests