But oh well, my next project that I have in mind is going to be centered on Broken Blade. Good luck to everyone else,
RADX888 wrote:Ahhhh, first submission I make to a contest and no cheese. I wish I could actually be there for the convention to see if my video even makes it into the Overflow.
But oh well, my next project that I have in mind is going to be centered on Broken Blade. Good luck to everyone else,

irriadin wrote:So here we are just a few days before the con. Are we lawyer approved?
irriadin wrote:So here we are just a few days before the con. Are we lawyer approved?
VicBond007 wrote:irriadin wrote:So here we are just a few days before the con. Are we lawyer approved?
All except for one video. If I didn't contact you, then you're lawyer approved.
l33tmeatwad wrote:VicBond007 wrote:irriadin wrote:So here we are just a few days before the con. Are we lawyer approved?
All except for one video. If I didn't contact you, then you're lawyer approved.
Interesting, makes me curious as to why a particular video wouldn't get approved, but I suppose you aren't at liberty to say.

Davis 51 wrote:The only persons whose business it is are the lawyers, VicBond's, and the editor of the video in question. I just hope it gets resolved.
Davis 51 wrote:The only persons whose business it is are the lawyers, VicBond's, and the editor of the video in question.
l33tmeatwad wrote:Davis 51 wrote:The only persons whose business it is are the lawyers, VicBond's, and the editor of the video in question.
I was really curious as to which video it was, my interest is only peaked as to what type of thing gets a video disqualified. Perhaps I didn't explain very well.
l33tmeatwad wrote:Davis 51 wrote:The only persons whose business it is are the lawyers, VicBond's, and the editor of the video in question.
I was really curious as to which video it was, my interest is only peaked as to what type of thing gets a video disqualified. Perhaps I didn't explain very well.
l33tmeatwad wrote:Davis 51 wrote:The only persons whose business it is are the lawyers, VicBond's, and the editor of the video in question.
I was really curious as to which video it was, my interest is only peaked as to what type of thing gets a video disqualified. Perhaps I didn't explain very well.

l33tmeatwad wrote:Davis 51 wrote:The only persons whose business it is are the lawyers, VicBond's, and the editor of the video in question.
I was not really curious as to which video it was, my interest is only peaked as to what type of thing gets a video disqualified. Perhaps I didn't explain very well.
l33tmeatwad wrote:SORRY!!!! My failure to proof my post caused some confusion, I corrected it, lol...I was trying to say I was NOT curious as to which video it was, lol...leaving out the NOT kinda changes the meaning...

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests