[Lossless] Ut Video Codec

This forum is for questions and discussion of all the aspects of handling your footage. If you have questions about capturing/ripping footage, AviSynth, or compression/encoding/converting, look here.

Re: [Lossless] Ut Video Codec

Postby Kawatta-kun » Sun Nov 21, 2010 6:06 pm

Always MediaPlayerClassic, the one at AMVapp.

And it is the kind of playing error it gives when converting using converters, most of the times because of the FPS I think.
Image Image
User avatar
Kawatta-kun
 
Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Location: Povoa de Santa Iria, Lisbon
Status: Awesomely great

Re: [Lossless] Ut Video Codec

Postby mirkosp » Sun Nov 21, 2010 6:42 pm

Try installing CCCP (if you haven't already) and use media player classic home cinema instead... if utvideo has been installed properly, it should play there. But playing it in virtualdub should work too, so you might want to just try there. If you have issues, I guess try reinstalling utvideo because maybe something went wrong during the installation?
Image
User avatar
mirkosp
MODkip
 
Joined: 24 Apr 2006
Location: Gallarate (VA), Italy
Status: (」・ワ・)」(⊃・ワ・)⊃

Re: [Lossless] Ut Video Codec

Postby Cannonaire » Mon Nov 22, 2010 1:58 am

Kawatta-kun wrote:Now, it gives me 4 options:
UT Video Codec RGB (ULRG) VCM x64;
UT Video Codec RGB (ULRA) VCM x64;
UT Video Codec YUV420 (ULY0) VCM x64;
UT Video Codec YUV422 (ULY2) VCM x64.


I'm pretty sure I found your problem. These won't work for you unless you're using them along with 64 bit software. Install the x86 version of UTVideo and try again.

There is a 64-bit version of Media Player Classic Home Cinema, but so far I haven't found a good use for it aside from testing 64-bit codecs I find.
Image Think millionaire, but with cannons. || Resident Maaya Sakamoto fan.
User avatar
Cannonaire
 
Joined: 05 May 2010
Location: Oregon
Status: OVERLOAD

Re: [Lossless] Ut Video Codec

Postby Cannonaire » Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:23 am

Meh. I'm tired. I just now noticed that you also installed the 32-bit version and you were using the 64-bit version of Vegas. My bad. Maybe there's a problem with having both the x86 and x64 codecs installed?
Image Think millionaire, but with cannons. || Resident Maaya Sakamoto fan.
User avatar
Cannonaire
 
Joined: 05 May 2010
Location: Oregon
Status: OVERLOAD

Re: [Lossless] Ut Video Codec

Postby Kawatta-kun » Mon Nov 22, 2010 10:18 am

Cannonaire wrote:Meh. I'm tired. I just now noticed that you also installed the 32-bit version and you were using the 64-bit version of Vegas. My bad. Maybe there's a problem with having both the x86 and x64 codecs installed?


At the AMVapp guide it says to have both, must have no problem. Oh well dunno :'x
Image Image
User avatar
Kawatta-kun
 
Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Location: Povoa de Santa Iria, Lisbon
Status: Awesomely great

Re: [Lossless] Ut Video Codec

Postby Kawatta-kun » Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:36 pm

Ok now I'm testing image quality. Tryng out in diferent video sources and now it works (on VDub). Let's hope it doesn't get bad again.
Image Image
User avatar
Kawatta-kun
 
Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Location: Povoa de Santa Iria, Lisbon
Status: Awesomely great

Re: [Lossless] Ut Video Codec

Postby Mister Hatt » Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:16 am

Also if it wasn't obvious, those 4 formats, you don't need to know what they mean besides for YUV420 is the only one you should actually be using unless you are an Advanced User (TM) which you are not.
Mister Hatt
 
Joined: 25 Dec 2007
Status: better than you

Re: [Lossless] Ut Video Codec

Postby Kawatta-kun » Sun Dec 05, 2010 7:58 am

I already know that the YUV420 is the better for compressing at VirtualDub.
But when rendering at our edition program? Some say RGB is the best, but why? And which of the two of it?
Image Image
User avatar
Kawatta-kun
 
Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Location: Povoa de Santa Iria, Lisbon
Status: Awesomely great

Re: [Lossless] Ut Video Codec

Postby mirkosp » Sun Dec 05, 2010 8:09 am

Go for YUV420, for the kind of footage and distro format we're working with it's the one that makes the most sense. Those that say that RGB is best either don't work with anime and don't distribute their work, or they just don't know that it's best to avoid colorspace conversions whenever possible, especially if you end up converting them wrong.
Image
User avatar
mirkosp
MODkip
 
Joined: 24 Apr 2006
Location: Gallarate (VA), Italy
Status: (」・ワ・)」(⊃・ワ・)⊃

Re: [Lossless] Ut Video Codec

Postby Cannonaire » Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:44 pm

I keep YUV420 for storage, but when I make clips I convert to RGB because I know that my NLE will process them that way anyway and I like to control how it's converted. I only use the $100 Vegas though, so I can't specify floating point or higher accuracy colorspaces. It's situational whether you should do one or the other, but YUV420 (YV12) is almost always the best option for our purposes.

When it comes to the final encode for distribution, use YV12. Nothing else makes sense right now. Image
Image Think millionaire, but with cannons. || Resident Maaya Sakamoto fan.
User avatar
Cannonaire
 
Joined: 05 May 2010
Location: Oregon
Status: OVERLOAD

Re: [Lossless] Ut Video Codec

Postby TheRyuu » Mon Dec 06, 2010 5:21 am

Kawatta-kun wrote:
Cannonaire wrote:Meh. I'm tired. I just now noticed that you also installed the 32-bit version and you were using the 64-bit version of Vegas. My bad. Maybe there's a problem with having both the x86 and x64 codecs installed?


At the AMVapp guide it says to have both, must have no problem. Oh well dunno :'x


Yes it's fine to have both.

Because virtualdub, avisynth, etc... is all 32bit you need the 32bit version. But because afx is 64bit (at least on the latest version) you need the 64bit version of the codec as well. It's perfectly safe to have both installed (there is a system32 and syswow64 for a reason).

And yea, use yv12 in basically all cases except when it has to be rgb(a) (in afx I guess).
TheRyuu
 
Joined: 19 May 2010

Re: [Lossless] Ut Video Codec

Postby Jemm54 » Sun Feb 06, 2011 5:24 pm

It looks like a really good alternative, but not convince me the size (which for me was enough, but when working with many files in the end will not use: P) end of files compared with Lagarith, the truth is that the difference in decoding speed did not notice ....

Spoiler :
Image


Maybe in the future with more HD to try it out in more detail, but for now I think I'll keep using L
User avatar
Jemm54
 
Joined: 12 Oct 2007
Location: Argentina!!
Status: Cow

Re: [Lossless] Ut Video Codec

Postby Mister Hatt » Mon Feb 07, 2011 5:05 am

Why are you even bothering with your comparison? It's obvious that you don't get how codecs or even subsampling work, or you wouldn't have bothered posting that in the first place. I'm fairly certain that every post I've seen from you so far does little to discourage one from thinking you're actually retarded. Do you even know what the 422 in the name means? Holy fuck.
Mister Hatt
 
Joined: 25 Dec 2007
Status: better than you

Re: [Lossless] Ut Video Codec

Postby Johny-115 » Sat Mar 05, 2011 3:47 pm

hello, iam kinda desperate, dunno what iam doing wrong with utv

iam using cs5 64bit adobe media encoder, after effects, premiere pro

heres what happens, i darkened samples so its more visible how colors break down
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3358708/temp/_original.png ... original
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3358708/temp/cineform.png ... ok (works fine, but trial, just for compare)
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3358708/temp/UTV-RGB.png ... ok, just minimal greenish color shift
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3358708/temp/UTV-420.png ... problem
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3358708/temp/UTV-422.png ... problem

- my editing process involves re-encoding it 3x times, so after that with what happens with 420/422, it damages visibly even without darkening it
- so also once it transfers chroma subsampling to that of codecs, why it gets worse and worse after every other recompress, its basically lossy
- dont understand this, source is YUV, 420, 8bit ... so i thought "YUV420 ULY0" should work best
- i tried all adobe media encoder options, turning off/on "render at maximum depth", "use maximum render quality", tried codec ignore client settings .. nothing helps

my only idea is that adobe works only with 24bit colorspace, or something like that, coz RGB ut video is fine, and also the reason why it gets worse every other re-encode .... but dunno, it shouldnt ... "render at maximum depth" tooltip says "8bit rendering when unchecked" ... and makes no difference when unchecked... pls what iam doing wrong
Johny-115
 
Joined: 15 Oct 2006

Re: [Lossless] Ut Video Codec

Postby post-it » Sat Mar 05, 2011 5:53 pm

Johny-115 wrote: i am using cs5 64bit adobe media encoder, after effects, premiere pro ..
which has nothing to do with storage problem for your Codec.

The editor is not utilizing 32bit-Alpha Level Images. Use Huffy to store what your working-on.

All of your images suggest that your using 16-bit color pallets instead of 32-bit color pallets.
[[ you might as well be editing in Xvid! ]]
User avatar
post-it
 
Joined: 17 Jul 2002
Status: Audio: bass remains; if else, 3D

PreviousNext

Return to Footage Help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests