http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u54JKBqQvCo
For those aspiring young film maker's that hang out here and have heard about the Mark II: GET ONE. This is a test I filmed with an $80 lens and 100 watt light bulbs. Look at that 1080p!
Beowulf wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u54JKBqQvCo
For those aspiring young film maker's that hang out here and have heard about the Mark II: GET ONE. This is a test I filmed with an $80 lens and 100 watt light bulbs. Look at that 1080p!

Brad wrote:Good. Now go make cool shit :O
Beowulf wrote:They can all do *nearly* as good, but it depends on what your definition of nearly is. I've played around with a D90 and the movie mode is an after-thought. The Mark II gives you the biggest DoF options, and the best iso performance for a camera under $5,000. That test footage was shot at 1600 iso! The Nikon for example, is pushing it at 800. There's a great camera shoot-out video, where they put a bunch of DSLRs through testing and the 5D wins all of them (in its class of course). The 7D looks *nearly* as good, but not as good.
I know you're basically paying an extra thousand dollars for better iso performance and DoF, but its that important to me.
As far as film making goes, the mark II is the only guy in town, and has been for a year now. I can't speak for Pentax, but I know that Nikon has nothing to compare to it. Its the best camera to make movies/narratives with in its price class.
Warheart wrote:But to be honest I'm just jealous.
requiett wrote:Damnit, this or the Scarlet?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests