Jefferys wrote:The general upshot is that the whole of AMV Contest Screening is usually blocked off to last around the 2.5 hour mark.
Isn't it always 2 hours?
Jefferys wrote:The general upshot is that the whole of AMV Contest Screening is usually blocked off to last around the 2.5 hour mark.
irriadin wrote:Jefferys wrote:The general upshot is that the whole of AMV Contest Screening is usually blocked off to last around the 2.5 hour mark.
Isn't it always 2 hours?

Jefferys wrote:msanogi wrote:How many AMVS are in each category traditionally? =0
There are usually around 5 or 6 finalists in each category.
Categories being: Action, Drama/Serious, Romance/Sentimental, Comedy, Trailer/Parody, and Upbeat
The general upshot is that the whole of AMV Contest Screening is usually blocked off to last around the 2.5 hour mark.
VicBond007 wrote:Jefferson's not an AMV staffer, he just plays one on TV.

irriadin wrote:Based on the number of videos, it doesn't look like many longer videos made the cut. There were 34 finalists last year and that was with the six minute time restriction in place.
chui101 wrote:Well, you can't statistically draw that conclusion without comparing the standard deviations of the lengths of the videos as well. Just because the means are similar doesn't mean the distribution of times is the same.
chui101 wrote:irriadin wrote:Based on the number of videos, it doesn't look like many longer videos made the cut. There were 34 finalists last year and that was with the six minute time restriction in place.
Well, you can't statistically draw that conclusion without comparing the standard deviations of the lengths of the videos as well. Just because the means are similar doesn't mean the distribution of times is the same.

chui101 wrote:irriadin wrote:Based on the number of videos, it doesn't look like many longer videos made the cut. There were 34 finalists last year and that was with the six minute time restriction in place.
Well, you can't statistically draw that conclusion without comparing the standard deviations of the lengths of the videos as well. Just because the means are similar doesn't mean the distribution of times is the same.
irriadin wrote:chui101 wrote:irriadin wrote:Based on the number of videos, it doesn't look like many longer videos made the cut. There were 34 finalists last year and that was with the six minute time restriction in place.
Well, you can't statistically draw that conclusion without comparing the standard deviations of the lengths of the videos as well. Just because the means are similar doesn't mean the distribution of times is the same.
That is true. There could be 32 videos 1 minute in length and 1 video 1 hour 33 minutes long for all I know!
moonbunnychan wrote:That would be the best contest EVER.
...now I kinda want to make a 1 hour 33 minute video....

irriadin wrote:chui101 wrote:irriadin wrote:Based on the number of videos, it doesn't look like many longer videos made the cut. There were 34 finalists last year and that was with the six minute time restriction in place.
Well, you can't statistically draw that conclusion without comparing the standard deviations of the lengths of the videos as well. Just because the means are similar doesn't mean the distribution of times is the same.
That is true. There could be 32 videos 1 minute in length and 1 video 1 hour 33 minutes long for all I know!
Code wrote:moonbunnychan wrote:That would be the best contest EVER.
...now I kinda want to make a 1 hour 33 minute video....
OOH. OOH. USE A vuvuzela!![]()
![]()
Users browsing this forum: BakaOppai and 1 guest