Silk_SK wrote: Bitching at the source choices is also allowed because sometimes they're complete bullshit.
Black sheep is a great source, shut up.
Silk_SK wrote: Bitching at the source choices is also allowed because sometimes they're complete bullshit.

OtakuGray wrote:Sometimes anime can branch out to a younger audience and this is one of those times where you wish children would just go die.
Stirspeare wrote:<Stirspeare> Lopez: Vanquish my virginity and flood me with kit. ["Ladies..."]

Kitsuner wrote:This entire thread is tierable.


Silk_SK wrote:gotegenks wrote:Shit Tier - Elfen Lied
The fuck are you smoking?
NS wrote:Why didn't you quote any of my shit? I'm really curious as to what you think. I really am, because I'm kinda baffled, to be honest, at your mindset that just because somebody uses old anime they should have to "play" An IC in a lower fucking tier, that's fucking stupid.
The amount and quality of work done in 2 hours heavily outweighs the differences in animation qualities between the editors sources for it to even matter.

gotegenks wrote:Silk_SK wrote:gotegenks wrote:Shit Tier - Elfen Lied
The fuck are you smoking?
well i personally hated that show's art, but i just put it there as an example, couldn't think of anything else for that tier.
Silk_SK wrote:Kitsuner wrote:This entire thread is tierable.
GOD Tier - God
High Tier - Arashinome (in all likelyhood)
Mid Tier - Kirby, Captain Falcon, Mario, Donkey Kong
Low Tier - Your mom
Shit Tier - This thread
gotegenks wrote:a better editor can pwn a worse editor that uses a good source by editing a "bad" source, a good editor can make a bad source look good, just like a bad editor can make a good source look bad.
nya=chan Production wrote:if I get well edited video with "" (or insert any (old/classic?) source you can't get in bigger resolution than 320x240 - with luck), I'll put it over generic Karas "random cuts" IC anytime.


gotegenks wrote:You're hung up on the idea that all sources are made equal, when they're not. If you were to edit with images then are the images of a high school art student going to be equal to paintings from a trained professional? (typically, not saying it's impossible)
sure, a better editor can pwn a worse editor that uses a good source by editing a "bad" source, a good editor can make a bad source look good, just like a bad editor can make a good source look bad. It depends on the editor.
jaddziadax wrote:if someone takes an anime you hate and puts it with a song you hate and edits it WONDERFULLY in a style you hate are you going to like it?
There are some people out there who can appreciate things they dislike. I can see the talent and time and effort in a video where I dislike all the sources.
I was mostly trying to argue his ability to like anything based on quality of editing alone. LIKE it, not appreciate.
JaddziaDax wrote:gotegenks wrote:I was mostly trying to argue his ability to like anything based on quality of editing alone. LIKE it, not appreciate.
I don't have to entirely like every single thing about a video for it to win a vote from me. As I said, most of weather or not I "like" a video is not based on sources but weather or not I like the concept and execution. In other words: the EDITING. You must be getting some pretty bad judges if they can't see past the sources. IC in my opinion is rarely about the sources, but more so about the editor's ability.
Ah yes, and since your "god tier" is so easy to edit with it's sweeping camera movements and intentional music sync, and your "shit tier" is so hard with all its duplicate animation and still frames, shouldn't it be named the other way around? Cause the way you make it sound, it's as though you need to be a "god editor" to be able to work with and win with a "shit tier" anime.
*Anyway as someone already mentioned the "quality tiering" would all be subjective... if you really wanted to make an IC completely fair you would use the same exact sources as your opponent.
jaddziadax wrote:If editors are on the "same (exact) skill level" then the IC is to prove who can make a better presentation in a short amount of time.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests