Thoughts on this story?

This forum is for the general discussion of Anime.

Re: Thoughts on this story?

Postby yuppa » Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:03 am

you hentai you^_^. I used to like lolicon,but after i got older say around drinking age it didnt appeal to me anymore. I couldnt leave the Cousin fantasy alone. LOL Now i am just a normal guy who wants as much sex as i can get from women not related to me.
END OF LINE
Once king of noobs...now king nothing!!
User avatar
yuppa
 
Joined: 02 May 2003
Location: behind MY own AT field
Status: Single again

Re: Thoughts on this story?

Postby OmniStrata » Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:28 pm

I like big boobs and I cannot lie...

From a human scientific perspective [lol] loli lovin's bad...

All teh right woman-parts aren't in yet [or man parts for you shota hunters]

In fact, it is said that child rape can cause irreparable damage to one's reproductive system... The girl may become a woman without the power to create life... A sad thing indeed. Especially if it's SOMEONE ELSE'S fault. I'm not counting the ladies who simply can't have babies, I'm referring specifically to ones who were abused as a kid and THEN because of that, this happens.

Do small boys get raped by grown women and then suffer motility extinction? Don't know, don't care, my guess is, probably not...

Fact is, little girls lack everything needed for good sex0rs and ultimately end up being very badly damaged.

Be a man, make love to women, preferably over the age of 17 who can live and act responsibly! This is my message...

You can fwap to loli's if you wish, but my opinion on this matter [not you as a person] has not changed...

You know, ladies between the ages of 30-45 can still be very attractive, the MILF archetype exists for a reason and I'm glad to be a part of teh milf lovers ^_^.

Oh yes, on the story? So much for privacy... seriously... Someone, not me, but someone's going to overthrow the government if our lives turn into fucking Mirror's Edge... Can't privacy exist anymore? apparently not...
"Strength lies in action. Let the weak react to me..." - Kamahl, Pit Fighter from Magic: the Gathering
"That is a mistake many of my enemies make. They think before they act. I act before I think!" - Vortigern from Merlin ('98)
"I AM REBORN!" - Dark Schneider Bastard!! OAV
User avatar
OmniStrata
 
Joined: 01 Aug 2001
Location: Chicago
Status: Wealthy

Re: Thoughts on this story?

Postby hasteroth » Tue Jun 16, 2009 2:06 pm

And i hate MILF. So bite me.
<Hacchinya> Stirspeare: ambassador of gaysex
<Stirspeare> Hacchinya: God's own ambassador.
User avatar
hasteroth
lost the bet
 
Joined: 25 Feb 2008
Location: Around
Status: Neither here nor there

Re: Thoughts on this story?

Postby Vivaldi » Tue Jun 16, 2009 2:16 pm

OmniStrata wrote:I like big boobs and I cannot lie...

From a human scientific perspective [lol] loli lovin's bad...

All teh right woman-parts aren't in yet [or man parts for you shota hunters]

In fact, it is said that child rape can cause irreparable damage to one's reproductive system... The girl may become a woman without the power to create life... A sad thing indeed. Especially if it's SOMEONE ELSE'S fault. I'm not counting the ladies who simply can't have babies, I'm referring specifically to ones who were abused as a kid and THEN because of that, this happens.

Do small boys get raped by grown women and then suffer motility extinction? Don't know, don't care, my guess is, probably not...

Fact is, little girls lack everything needed for good sex0rs and ultimately end up being very badly damaged.

Be a man, make love to women, preferably over the age of 17 who can live and act responsibly! This is my message...

You can fwap to loli's if you wish, but my opinion on this matter [not you as a person] has not changed...

You know, ladies between the ages of 30-45 can still be very attractive, the MILF archetype exists for a reason and I'm glad to be a part of teh milf lovers ^_^.

Oh yes, on the story? So much for privacy... seriously... Someone, not me, but someone's going to overthrow the government if our lives turn into fucking Mirror's Edge... Can't privacy exist anymore? apparently not...

So are you talking about prepubescent children? Yeah.

But people 14+\post-puberty are sexually adults. Not that I condone child-sex\rape ect. just being objective.

But fapping to manga should fit into the equation anywhere, it's paper.
Image
Image
<Kenzichu> HAHAHA!!
<Kenzichu> everyone died!
User avatar
Vivaldi
Polemic Apologist
 
Joined: 29 Sep 2007
Location: Petting mah cat..

Re: Thoughts on this story?

Postby hasteroth » Tue Jun 16, 2009 2:18 pm

Vivaldi wrote:
But fapping to manga should fit into the equation anywhere, it's pictures DRAWN on paper.


Fix'd

Because photos are still paper.
<Hacchinya> Stirspeare: ambassador of gaysex
<Stirspeare> Hacchinya: God's own ambassador.
User avatar
hasteroth
lost the bet
 
Joined: 25 Feb 2008
Location: Around
Status: Neither here nor there

Re: Thoughts on this story?

Postby Vivaldi » Tue Jun 16, 2009 2:28 pm

hasteroth wrote:
Vivaldi wrote:
But fapping to manga should fit into the equation anywhere, it's pictures DRAWN on paper.


Fix'd

Because photos are still paper.

But the act itself wouldn't be wrong, because it's still ink and paper. It's the fact that a photo implies the event actually occurred. A photorealistic 3d rendering isn't any worse than a stick figure doodle to anything other than your sensabilities. A line needs to be drawn in the sand somewhere. I say it should be the line between what's real, and what's not.
Image
Image
<Kenzichu> HAHAHA!!
<Kenzichu> everyone died!
User avatar
Vivaldi
Polemic Apologist
 
Joined: 29 Sep 2007
Location: Petting mah cat..

Re: Thoughts on this story?

Postby hasteroth » Tue Jun 16, 2009 2:32 pm

Vivaldi wrote:
hasteroth wrote:
Vivaldi wrote:
But fapping to manga should fit into the equation anywhere, it's pictures DRAWN on paper.


Fix'd

Because photos are still paper.

But the act itself wouldn't be wrong, because it's still ink and paper. It's the fact that a photo implies the event actually occurred. A photorealistic 3d rendering isn't any worse than a stick figure doodle to anything other than your sensabilities. A line needs to be drawn in the sand somewhere. I say it should be the line between what's real, and what's not.


Exactly
<Hacchinya> Stirspeare: ambassador of gaysex
<Stirspeare> Hacchinya: God's own ambassador.
User avatar
hasteroth
lost the bet
 
Joined: 25 Feb 2008
Location: Around
Status: Neither here nor there

Re: Thoughts on this story?

Postby outlawed » Tue Jun 16, 2009 4:42 pm

I am at a loss for words with this thread.

The only thing I can do is share some fun.

http://www.theonion.com/content/news/co ... raged_over
User avatar
outlawed
 
Joined: 12 Jan 2001
Location: Lost

Re: Thoughts on this story?

Postby Sukunai » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:03 pm

Well I suppose the worst thing that should be possible, from wanking to a picture, is a paper cut.

But ask yourself this, you walk into a room, and you find a guy over 20, boner in full use, fapping as fast as he can, and he's looking to lose his load looking at a naked girl under the age of 12.

What is your response?
Really?

What if it's a picture of a girl you know?
What if it's you sister, your niece, your daughter?

Is it ok, that it's just a picture and your sister/niece/daughter is in no danger of suffering actual harm?
Then again, how did they get the picture?

Does it make a damn bit of difference if the picture is imaginary, a non real person?
How about this, imagine the person has both types of pictures handy?
Go a little further, they have a picture of your sister/niece/daughter, and then a drawing of your sister/niece/daughter in some extreme sexual situation.

Does any of this not totally bother you?

I am fully aware that persons under 13 are a lot less developed both mentally and physically.
After 13 it's mostly just mentally not fully developed.
Likely explains a lot of teen age pregnancies.
Fully able to screw, not fully able to enjoy it intelligently.

That's why not all of our laws/safe guards are well thought out.
Yeah, totally prohibit sex for the under 13, but as for the over 13, yet under 20, it's not that they need to not engage in sex, they need to be saved from just not thinking it through in most cases.

A 13 year old girl being ok having sex with a guy older than 20 needs to be told to stick to her own age range.
And a guy older than 20 needs to be told to get his shit together and stick to his own age range too.
It's not a crime, it's just bloody irresponsible behaviour.
Anime, one of the few things about the internet that doesn't make me hate the internet.
User avatar
Sukunai
 
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Location: Ontario Canada

Re: Thoughts on this story?

Postby hasteroth » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:08 pm

Sukunai. We're talking about drawings of fictional characters. Not photographs.

And btw I hate hentai that is drawn to look like real people.
<Hacchinya> Stirspeare: ambassador of gaysex
<Stirspeare> Hacchinya: God's own ambassador.
User avatar
hasteroth
lost the bet
 
Joined: 25 Feb 2008
Location: Around
Status: Neither here nor there

Re: Thoughts on this story?

Postby Vivaldi » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:25 pm

Sukunai wrote:Well I suppose the worst thing that should be possible, from wanking to a picture, is a paper cut.

But ask yourself this, you walk into a room, and you find a guy over 20, boner in full use, fapping as fast as he can, and he's looking to lose his load looking at a naked girl under the age of 12.

What is your response?

I'd tell him to either do it in his own room or get a lock.


What if it's a picture of a girl you know?
What if it's you sister, your niece, your daughter?

Is it ok, that it's just a picture and your sister/niece/daughter is in no danger of suffering actual harm?
Then again, how did they get the picture?

I believe I already addressed the point that a photograph implies the event either took place (If explicit) Or the person has a fixation on a very specific individuel (If not). So no, it's not the same at all/


Does it make a damn bit of difference if the picture is imaginary, a non real person?

Yes, in fact I think it makes a certifiably huge difference. And if that appeal to fear above was supposed to prove that, it certainly did no such thing.

How about this, imagine the person has both types of pictures handy?
Go a little further, they have a picture of your sister/niece/daughter, and then a drawing of your sister/niece/daughter in some extreme sexual situation.

I...What? You're pulling just random situations out of your ass. I could just as easily say "You walk in on a guy playing the game world domination on his iphone. But what if he has a real nuclear launch button with him? Wouldn't you be worried?"

I could respond to that completely irrelevant point, but I already did so at the top of this post. Check there.

Does any of this not totally bother you?

If he had a real picture or a drawing of a real person that he knows on a personal level. Then yes, I'd be very bothered.

I am fully aware that persons under 13 are a lot less developed both mentally and physically.
After 13 it's mostly just mentally not fully developed.
Likely explains a lot of teen age pregnancies.
Fully able to screw, not fully able to enjoy it intelligently.

That's why not all of our laws/safe guards are well thought out.
Yeah, totally prohibit sex for the under 13, but as for the over 13, yet under 20, it's not that they need to not engage in sex, they need to be saved from just not thinking it through in most cases.

A 13 year old girl being ok having sex with a guy older than 20 needs to be told to stick to her own age range.
And a guy older than 20 needs to be told to get his shit together and stick to his own age range too.
It's not a crime, it's just bloody irresponsible behaviour.

And this I agree with. Though I think teens are plenty mentally developed, and most would know not to have sex like that. Those who do are those who would be just as stupid when they're grown up.
Image
Image
<Kenzichu> HAHAHA!!
<Kenzichu> everyone died!
User avatar
Vivaldi
Polemic Apologist
 
Joined: 29 Sep 2007
Location: Petting mah cat..

Re: Thoughts on this story?

Postby Pas » Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:03 pm

hasteroth wrote:And btw I hate hentai that is drawn to look like real people.

We know. It's ok that you appreciate the other, less appreciated parts of the H industry.

<Niotex> Look at him go
<Niotex> Running for his loli's
<Fall_Child42> his guro lolis
<ngsilver> [16:33] <hasteroth|> I just loves the guro lolis
<Fall_Child42> they are all decapitated and shit
<Pas> lmao
<yoko|> shitting dick nipples that way! -->
<Pas> oh snap.
<Pas> so hasteroth is into guro?
<Niotex> Yup
<Fall_Child42> yup
<ngsilver> apears so

Guro loli > Real people

Amirite?
Pas
のヮの
 
Joined: 01 Jul 2007

Re: Thoughts on this story?

Postby hasteroth » Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:05 pm

no. Don't bring it here!
<Hacchinya> Stirspeare: ambassador of gaysex
<Stirspeare> Hacchinya: God's own ambassador.
User avatar
hasteroth
lost the bet
 
Joined: 25 Feb 2008
Location: Around
Status: Neither here nor there

Re: Thoughts on this story?

Postby hasteroth » Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:06 pm

And I hate guro
<Hacchinya> Stirspeare: ambassador of gaysex
<Stirspeare> Hacchinya: God's own ambassador.
User avatar
hasteroth
lost the bet
 
Joined: 25 Feb 2008
Location: Around
Status: Neither here nor there

Re: Thoughts on this story?

Postby ngsilver » Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:08 pm

But the logs, they do not lie!
ImageImage
ImageImageImage
User avatar
ngsilver
The Hookah Guy
 
Joined: 28 Jun 2003
Location: Detroit area
Status: Calm Your Miniature Colorful Horses

PreviousNext

Return to General Anime

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests