Final Cut Pro vs Final Cut Express question
- NightMistress85
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 2:42 am
- Location: Washington, DC
- Contact:
Final Cut Pro vs Final Cut Express question
I'm considering getting final cut express over pro, to save myself a good grand. However, I was wondering if FCE has some features that I noticed with FCP. Do they both generally have the same matting capabilties? (like 8 point garbage matting), as well as color key capabilities (like when I want to make a color transparent). Also, does FCP have a significantly greater choice for effects and transitions?
-
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 4:47 am
In my experience, FCE is going to have just about all you need, minus the ability to edit in many different codecs (like DVCPRO50, etc). It also doesn't have quite as advanced color correction abilities. But the garbage matte is the same (you can download a free plug-in that is 50 point, I believe) and a lot of the other filters are the same.
I have Final Cut Studio 1 and FCE 4, and I find myself switching back and forth between the two. I like FCS1 for Compressor, Motion, and Cinema Tools, but I think for most people (especially with making of fan videos) that FCE is more than ENOUGH.
Of course, if you are a power user who feels like you must edit in 23.976 or something, get Final Cut Studio.
I have Final Cut Studio 1 and FCE 4, and I find myself switching back and forth between the two. I like FCS1 for Compressor, Motion, and Cinema Tools, but I think for most people (especially with making of fan videos) that FCE is more than ENOUGH.
Of course, if you are a power user who feels like you must edit in 23.976 or something, get Final Cut Studio.
- LivingFlame
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:41 pm
- Location: Closer than you think...
- Kionon
- I ♥ the 80's
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2001 10:13 pm
- Status: Ayukawa MODoka.
- Location: I wonder if you know how they live in Tokyo... DRIFT, DRIFT, DRIFT
- Contact:
-
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 4:47 am
How recently have you used it?
FCE 4 lacks the ability to edit in the 23.976 timebase. You get a choice of a few codecs (DV and Apple Intermediate Codec) and you have less media bundled in LiveType. It lacks, of course, the other apps (like Compressor, Soundtrack, Cinema Tools). You can't fine-tune color correction quite as well.
It used to lack the ability to keyframe filters, but that was added in FCE 3.5.
What else about FCE4 compares so badly to FCP? I admit I am not a power user in either so I probably am missing some of the nuances. But then again, I have a feeling that a lot of other people making fan videos are similar to me.
Please educate me—I'd like to understand better how exactly it's so inferior. Please give specifics, because as I said, I'm not a power user. All the reviews I read (and the comments I read on places like the Final Cut forums on Apple.com) say that it's pretty good, and usually more than enough if you're not a professional.
FCE 4 lacks the ability to edit in the 23.976 timebase. You get a choice of a few codecs (DV and Apple Intermediate Codec) and you have less media bundled in LiveType. It lacks, of course, the other apps (like Compressor, Soundtrack, Cinema Tools). You can't fine-tune color correction quite as well.
It used to lack the ability to keyframe filters, but that was added in FCE 3.5.
What else about FCE4 compares so badly to FCP? I admit I am not a power user in either so I probably am missing some of the nuances. But then again, I have a feeling that a lot of other people making fan videos are similar to me.
Please educate me—I'd like to understand better how exactly it's so inferior. Please give specifics, because as I said, I'm not a power user. All the reviews I read (and the comments I read on places like the Final Cut forums on Apple.com) say that it's pretty good, and usually more than enough if you're not a professional.
- LivingFlame
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:41 pm
- Location: Closer than you think...
Does FCE4 = FCE HD? FCE HD is what we have at my school. Well, anyway...
I'm sure it would be fine if you planned on being nothing more than a hobbyist dabbling in video editing. I, on the other hand, am majoring in Visual Communication and currently work in video production. That said, I can't stand the limitations of FCE, especially codec limitations. When I tried using FCE on my university's computers, I was used to using Premiere (on Mac) and Vegas (on PC). FCE just felt clunky and less responsive than I would desire in an editing program. I haven't used FCP, so I can't make a direct comparison to that.
I didn't stick with FCE for any extensive period of time. I just got fed up with it and brought in my laptop with Premiere on it and got finished editing much faster.
And for the record, I don't know if the lack of responsiveness was due to the software or if the university's hardware just sucks. (I can't recall what the hardware specs are, right now, and I'm 150~ miles away from the school.) I just know it wasn't as responsive as what I expect out of a program.
Oh, and the FCE titler can bite me. I just started making titles in Photoshop instead.
Random tidbit: if deinterlaced/IVTC'd, most anime will end up being 23.976 fps.
I'm sure it would be fine if you planned on being nothing more than a hobbyist dabbling in video editing. I, on the other hand, am majoring in Visual Communication and currently work in video production. That said, I can't stand the limitations of FCE, especially codec limitations. When I tried using FCE on my university's computers, I was used to using Premiere (on Mac) and Vegas (on PC). FCE just felt clunky and less responsive than I would desire in an editing program. I haven't used FCP, so I can't make a direct comparison to that.
I didn't stick with FCE for any extensive period of time. I just got fed up with it and brought in my laptop with Premiere on it and got finished editing much faster.
And for the record, I don't know if the lack of responsiveness was due to the software or if the university's hardware just sucks. (I can't recall what the hardware specs are, right now, and I'm 150~ miles away from the school.) I just know it wasn't as responsive as what I expect out of a program.
Oh, and the FCE titler can bite me. I just started making titles in Photoshop instead.
Random tidbit: if deinterlaced/IVTC'd, most anime will end up being 23.976 fps.
... yea ...
-
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 4:47 am
No I don't think FCE HD is the latest: http://www.apple.com/finalcutexpress/
No mention of HD there. Sounds like you have version 3 or 3.5.
Most of the people I know who make fan videos are hobbyists, and are not willing to pay somewhere around $1000 to indulge their hobby. So I'd say that for many fan video enthusiasts, FCE 4 is more than enough. You clearly are in a different category, because you intend to go pro. A lot of the people I know are more than happy with what FCE offers them, and won't get near to pushing it to its limits. Purchasing FCP would be massive overkill. (It was probably overkill for me too, but I got a very good deal on it.)
Sure, the codec issue is annoying. I've learned to live with it and have a lot of DVDs converted over to DV MOV, so I can switch back and forth between FCP and FCE without rendering.
If FCE felt clunky to you, then FCP probably would too. (My guess, since their interfaces are very, very similar. Almost identical at first glance.) I think a lot of it is your hardware, and what you're used to. I found Vegas incomprehensible at first, and also found Premiere unintuitive. I like Premiere (Elements, which I have) much better after having gotten used to it, but Vegas is still a bit of a mystery, and it has several things I actively dislike. (But it's fine, I'm sure, once you learn it properly.)
As for LiveType, a lot of people claim that is one of the best things about the Final Cut Suite. It takes a bit of getting used to, but let's just say it's a far cry better than using Photoshop for making titles!
No mention of HD there. Sounds like you have version 3 or 3.5.
Most of the people I know who make fan videos are hobbyists, and are not willing to pay somewhere around $1000 to indulge their hobby. So I'd say that for many fan video enthusiasts, FCE 4 is more than enough. You clearly are in a different category, because you intend to go pro. A lot of the people I know are more than happy with what FCE offers them, and won't get near to pushing it to its limits. Purchasing FCP would be massive overkill. (It was probably overkill for me too, but I got a very good deal on it.)
Sure, the codec issue is annoying. I've learned to live with it and have a lot of DVDs converted over to DV MOV, so I can switch back and forth between FCP and FCE without rendering.
If FCE felt clunky to you, then FCP probably would too. (My guess, since their interfaces are very, very similar. Almost identical at first glance.) I think a lot of it is your hardware, and what you're used to. I found Vegas incomprehensible at first, and also found Premiere unintuitive. I like Premiere (Elements, which I have) much better after having gotten used to it, but Vegas is still a bit of a mystery, and it has several things I actively dislike. (But it's fine, I'm sure, once you learn it properly.)
As for LiveType, a lot of people claim that is one of the best things about the Final Cut Suite. It takes a bit of getting used to, but let's just say it's a far cry better than using Photoshop for making titles!
- BasharOfTheAges
- Just zis guy, you know?
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 11:32 pm
- Status: Breathing
- Location: Merrimack, NH
This is completely true. Yet a significant number of people here have such software anyway. Read between the lines a bit.mahler wrote:Most of the people I know who make fan videos are hobbyists, and are not willing to pay somewhere around $1000 to indulge their hobby.
Anime Boston Fan Creations Coordinator (2019-2023)
Anime Boston Fan Creations Staff (2016-2018)
Another Anime Convention AMV Contest Coordinator 2008-2016
| | |
Anime Boston Fan Creations Staff (2016-2018)
Another Anime Convention AMV Contest Coordinator 2008-2016
| | |
-
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 4:47 am
Yes, of course I know how they get it.
Sure, if expense is not an issue when acquiring software, then get the pro version rather than the express. They're not paying for it either way, so they can afford to be picky.
It also is true that not everyone desires to *ahem* "acquire" expensive software without paying for it. I know quite a few people like this. And actually, I am like this. It's not a bad way to be. Just like it's not a bad thing to prefer to buy the DVDs rather than downloading bootlegged movies or episodes. Or to buy the music you use in a video, rather than getting it for free on Limewire.
I've also encountered people who have difficulty "acquiring" software. (Like, people on dial-up.)
Sure, if expense is not an issue when acquiring software, then get the pro version rather than the express. They're not paying for it either way, so they can afford to be picky.
It also is true that not everyone desires to *ahem* "acquire" expensive software without paying for it. I know quite a few people like this. And actually, I am like this. It's not a bad way to be. Just like it's not a bad thing to prefer to buy the DVDs rather than downloading bootlegged movies or episodes. Or to buy the music you use in a video, rather than getting it for free on Limewire.
I've also encountered people who have difficulty "acquiring" software. (Like, people on dial-up.)