
RAWdangers wrote:Pwolf wrote:Hypothetically speaking, if the judges don't like the sound of the vocals in a song they can remove points for audio. Or maybe they don't like classical music so they knock down points for that. Or what about a judge that doesn't like effects so any video that uses effects will lose points for visuals and editing. If they guidelines are open to interpretation then why not? Is that fair? I certainly hope not.
Nice slippery slope argument. If you actually think the judges are going to be that petty, then you have no faith in the judges. I believe this debate is over.
OtakuGray wrote:Sometimes Avatar can branch out to a younger audience and this is one of those times where you wish children would just go die.
Stirspeare wrote:<Stirspeare> Lopez: Vanquish my virginity and flood me with kit. ["Ladies.??"]
GuntherAMVs wrote:*in lawyer clothes*
*bangs Tommy* OwO. ? ?
*flings sparkles* >w<~

GuntherAMVs wrote:sparkles
GuntherAMVs wrote:sparkles
RAWdangers wrote:Pwolf wrote:Hypothetically speaking, if the judges don't like the sound of the vocals in a song they can remove points for audio. Or maybe they don't like classical music so they knock down points for that. Or what about a judge that doesn't like effects so any video that uses effects will lose points for visuals and editing. If they guidelines are open to interpretation then why not? Is that fair? I certainly hope not.
Nice slippery slope argument. If you actually think the judges are going to be that petty, then you have no faith in the judges. I believe this debate is over.
Pwolf wrote:RAWdangers wrote:Pwolf wrote:Hypothetically speaking, if the judges don't like the sound of the vocals in a song they can remove points for audio. Or maybe they don't like classical music so they knock down points for that. Or what about a judge that doesn't like effects so any video that uses effects will lose points for visuals and editing. If they guidelines are open to interpretation then why not? Is that fair? I certainly hope not.
Nice slippery slope argument. If you actually think the judges are going to be that petty, then you have no faith in the judges. I believe this debate is over.
I'm being serious. "Originality" is a personal preference in my opinion, just the same as musical taste. It shouldn't be a factor in judging, unless asked for.
JaddziaDax wrote:GuntherAMVs wrote:sparklesGuntherAMVs wrote:sparkles
okay Sparkles wins me over, which is your vid? I'll give you all 20s.?? O:
BasharOfTheAges wrote:To be fair, each judge's scale is personal preference for everything. You shouldn't score by formula, it renders the human aspect worthless.
Kimberly wrote:Pwolf wrote:RAWdangers wrote:I say we stop getting on the judges case and telling them how to judge before even one round of judging. No matter what every judge is going to judge slightly differently and its not up to the competitors to decide how they should judge.
But the coordinator has laid out how the judges should judge. I'm only asking that they follow the standard of judging set out by the coordinator. Of which, originality isn't mentioned or clearly defined. The standards, as they are currently written, are clear and I want to make sure the judges are being fair when they are doing their job.
I just wanted to ask, out of curiosity, and I'm not going to change any scores. But how would you judge theme then? Since originality isn't included, would you give full points for the theme if they chose to do Summer and just put a bunch of Summer scenes in their video?:
Return to Project OrgEditor Season 3: The King of Spring
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest