Ichiban Crush wrote:First of all, I wasn't going at full force. That wasn't bitching, that was calm. See any exclamation points? No. Second, she's not my girlfriend. Third, you don't know my drinking ability that well (when you've grown up in a college town, you LEARN to drink at an early age, and yes I'm 21, too late to call the cops). Fourth, if you couldn't remember anything, why bother making shit up? And if you're gonna make up stuff for humorous purposes, the LEAST you could do is add a disclaimer saying "WARNING: None of this really happened, or maybe it did, I dunno, I was too friggin' plastered to remember". Honestly, I couldn't tell if you really meant it, but it wasn't that funny.
Let's not get into a pissing contest over who can hold more liquor, cause it'll turn into this:
"Personally, I'd side with dannywilson on this one, because we were both in the military and I *KNOW* if he likes drinking as much as he did at the con, that outside the con he drinks enough to put you to shame. (Hell, My tolerance is waning as I drink less and less and I still put most college kids to shame for sheer volume, try hitting 80 bars in one night, two drinks per bar and then walking three miles to get home, then waking up at 5 the next morning and going running, little man.)"
Secondly, let's not get into a pissing contest over who is angrier. I'm right pissed off right now, but you don't see me typing in all caps or using exclamation marks.
Thirdly, when posting obviously manipulated photos, it's not necesary to say 'This is what I imagined happened' or 'this never happened', because it's OBVIOUS.
If you couldn't tell that he was being humorous, then maybe you need to take a break from the internet and your heavy drinking and take a step back and look at reality. Somebody who passed out in an elevator and woke up with graffitti all over them, then had their picture taken isn't going to share that picture with you unless he's trying to make you laugh, that is to say *TRYING TO BE HUMOUROUS!!!*
Ichiban Crush wrote:
I mean, I don't know if said girl in pic MINDS (I on the otherhand won't bitch of my image used). I'd imagine she'd be pissed with being refered to as "Tittybitch".
She may or may not mind, but she was being called it to her face at the con, and that was what everybody who saw her and/or was looking for her called her.
Ichiban Crush wrote:
Even if she was drunk and told you "yeah, take pics", that doesn't mean "take pics, post 'em on public forums". Ethics, my friend, ethics.
No, not ETHICS, Compassion. Being a professional photographer, I've had several classes in ethics and Danny didn't violate ethics by snapping her photo and then posting it. The second she said yes, drunk or not, she gave her express verbal permission, thus giving Danny full ownership of the photograph/digital image he was about to take, and therefore that photo/image is his to do with as he pleases, to include publishing it. The fact that she was *POSING* for the pictures backs up the verbal agreement and therefore any claim she might have had that she didn't give her permission are forfeit.
Then again, this being a *PUBLIC* convention and trying as she was to make herself into a public figure, he didn't even need to ask her permission.
(For the record, those paparazzi who 'ran Princess Di into the wall trying to get her photograph' weren't being unethical, public figures haven't the same rights to privacy as the rest of us, they were just being uncompassionate and intrusive)
It'd be one thing if danny or myself had snuck up on her in the bushes and snapped photos of her making out with her boy/girlfriend, but he didn't(I would hope.)