Nya-chan Production wrote:Your idea of rating is very weird, but whatevs floats your boat. Also, yep, once I posted I realized you probably didn't know whose it was, so...
Well, overally no prob. Just saying that to give a video 100 poins... if I rated, there would be probably 0,1-0,2% chance that such a good video would appear and I'd give it one hundred. I suppose I just prefer the "I rate by video facts" judges over the "I rate how it amused me", is all. Just my preferences, yay.
So, explain the "I rate by video facts" to me. I didn't just vote that video the way I did because it amused me; as far as I'm concerned, it was pretty damn-near note perfect for the round. I could have quibbled a point or two off for something, I guess, but I was feeling magnanimous and just gave it top marks across the board because after I watched it 7 times through, I STILL couldn't find anything wrong with it. Now, that's just me--maybe there are better or more discerning judges. Maybe I just suck at judging. Maybe I'm not nitpicky enough. But all I know is that I loved the video, it made me laugh (subjective) and it met the criteria awesomely, was super-well edited and an amazingly well-done video (objective).
So, if somehow that all falls under the "OMG MADE ME LULZ 100% " judges group, then I guess I'm in that one.