Begi wrote:Pwolf wrote:multiple reasons being? if it's something we can fix, then i would like to know. i can't help it from being dead though unless more people start frequenting it
I just think it's pretty stupid overall.
If you're not willing to use the resources that are available because you "think its stupid" then somethings wrong. That's being lazy, grow up.
Begi wrote:Pwolf wrote:The point is to figure out whats wrong and fix it, not add more stuff without actually figuring out what the problem is.
I said it a billion times already.?.THERE ISN'T ENOUGH INTERACTION (imo) BETWEEN EDITORS ON THE FORUM. That's the problem.
There's plenty of interaction on the forums. The resources are already there for what you want, which has been argued by several people already. It's not a problem.
Begi wrote:gotegenks wrote:i think a section for betas would ENCOURAGE beta sharing, which would ENCOURAGE communication, connection, friendship, better editing, and activity, everything that outsiders say we lack.
I would agree to an extent but I really don't think it would make much of a difference. I say, go ahead and do it, lets see what happens, maybe it will help.
Next time, instead of saying the chatroom sucks because you personally think it's stupid, try making a more convincing argument for what you want without swearing at other people. I asked you the first time what was wrong with the chatroom and you never gave me an honest answer that supports your argument.
This thread is for discussing ideas. We can't make everything happen so there has to be a compromise. I've been offering the compromise, a resource that already exists. No one has given me a counter argument against it other then "it's stupid", "it's dead", or "they might be on vacation"??? Seriously? I don't care what happens to the forum, if it gets a million more subforums, good for it. I want to make the chatroom a better place for people to get help and to interact with other editors.



















