Philosophy in Anime

This forum is for the general discussion of Anime.

Philosophy in Anime

Postby Athena » Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:52 am

This topic is about the discussion of philosophical questions as shown in Japanese animation. For this topic, SPOILERS ARE NECESSARY. Let me say that again, because of the complexity of the arguments, much will have to be disclosed about the anime you are citing, and SPOILERS ARE UNAVOIDABLE. I also feel the spoiler tag would make discourse unacceptably restricted. This means, of course, that if you are particularly shy of spoilers, this may not be the topic for you. You participate, you accept that you have waived your right to complain about being spoiled.

Before explaining just what Philosophy in Anime means, let me be clear that the Philosophy of Anime is something else entirely. Philosophy of Anime would be concerned with questions like "What is anime?" "What purposes does anime serve?" "Are there subjects anime can't or shouldn't cover?" "Can anime really be good or bad?" While these questions are fascinating, they are much harder than what I propose to talk about here. This is not what I am asking, although if there is enough interest, that topic could be made.

More, what I am doing is looking to my fellow philosophers who have discussed Philosophy in courses such as Philosophy in Literature, Philosophy in Film, Philosophy in Science Fiction, Philosophy in the Media, and even Philosophy in Harry Potter (yes, real class) to apply the same search for examples to anime. These courses are concerned with the way that philosophical problems are presented in various forms of media. Let's look at some examples.

The issue of scepticism, such as Rene Descartes's Demon Deceiver, or more updated, Hilary Putnam's brain-in-vat scenario, could be looked at by examining the Matrix. This would be an example of Philosophy in Film.

The issue of whether or not there are moral limits to science could be looked at by reading Frankenstein. This would be an example of Philosophy in Literature.

We could consider the ways that journalists refer to different philosophical arguments as they relate them to breaking news. This would be an example of Philosophy in the Media.

We could even look at the nature of evil by comparing and contrasting Tom Riddle and Harry Potter, who despite their similar childhoods, have very different views about morality, if Tom could be said to have a morality (perhaps he was an aficionado of the 20th century existentialists, like Sartre, and considers morality, and evil, to be illusory). Yep, you guessed it, this would be Philosophy in Harry Potter.

So, let's consider anime. I will start. I will look at the issue of free will as portrayed in the ending episode of Kimagure Orange Road TV series, episodes 47 and 48.

Not much is known about the Madoka that is pre-Kyosuke. Most is conjecture based on canonical clues. I'll go ahead and explain my view of her biography based on logical conjectures drawn from said clues. You should shortly begin to see how it provides a definite challenge to the concept of free well.

We do know that Madoka falls in love with Kyosuke from the get go (as he does her) in the first moments of the first episode. We also know that she probably does so because of the time loop from episodes 47 and 48. I could probably write a very long biography on Madoka alone, so bear with me as I try to explain the depth of characterization that a casual KOR fan (much less a casual viewer) probably has not considered.

A chronology of Madoka Personality-Defining events would probably start with her parents permanently relocating to America but leaving Madoka in the care of her much older sister. Madoka's older sister is portrayed as the "good" or "perfect" daughter. The reasons why will not be be covered here. Madoka, feeling the strain of living up to her rich successful parents' standards (while being separated from them), and being raised by the "perfect daughter" older sister, rebels first by becoming a tomboy. Preteen Madoka is rough and ready, playing soccer, fighting boys, and generally acting male and masculine, including dressing like a boy to the point where other boys think she's one of them.

It is not until Kyosuke from 1988 shows up in 1982 due to a time loop and Preteen Madoka falls in love with him does she change her appearance. And yet, she really only changes her appearance dramatically. From what we're shown, we know that in the years from 1982 to 1987, Madoka grows her hair long and chooses to wear more feminine clothes based on the fact that Kyosuke described 1988 Madoka to 1982 Madoka when asked about what type of girl he "prefered." Confused yet? It gets better. Madoka still messes around with gangs, and has come to be known as "Madoka The Pick" for her skill at using guitar picks as throwing stars.

The first episode with the "Nice Catch" scene that is so famous, actually is a huge clue that ties right back into the last episodes of the series. Madoka is changing by 1987 and is pulling herself slowly out of the rough and tumble lifestyle she started in her younger years. The stairs scene in the start of the first episode is an example of the "non-delinquent" days Madoka has started to allow herself. At school and around the neighborhood, she is still thought of a delinquent and bully. Kyosuke of 1987 sees a Madoka he helped create in 1988 because he saw her as she appeared in 1987. Circular chronology! The basic point of the time loop is to suggest that Madoka would have continued on a self-destructive path had Kyosuke of 1988 not time looped to continue the process. Instead, Madoka would have been a much worse gangster, bully, and delinquent (as is shown in the alternate universe at play in episode 48 where Kyosuke does not exist). The bond of love between Kyosuke and Madoka literally compells the universe to unite them, and it thereby saves Madoka from becoming a truly horrible person.

So, how does this illustrate the problem of Free Will? If Madoka only exists as she is, with all of her choices from 1982 on because that was the path circular chronology shows she had to take in order to be Madoka in 1987, and so also in 1988, did Madoka really have any "choices" at all or Did Kyosuke take choice away from her? And if Kyosuke created the circumstances under which Madoka of 1987 would meet him, already turned into his ideal girl, the concept of he only has because of meeting Madoka, did he have a choice in falling for her? Is the meeting predestined as I suggest in the final paragraph of the summary? And even if it is, does this necessitate the choices being false?

Even if I grant predestination, which I don't, certainly not in a religious context, I don't feel that Madoka of 1982 was tricked into becoming Madoka of 1987/1988. While I think a certain path is obvious for us, as omiscient viewers, I do not think the path is obvious for Madoka. Despite making choices that were "right" according to the path that is obvious to us, I don't feel that negates Madoka's ability to choose. I believe her choices represent her true desires, and whether predestined or not, do represent Free Will. I believe this is equally true for Kyosuke. That what they would choose is so strongly supported by the universe is either a testament to their love, or Kyosuke's ESP skills, or both.

What do you think? What philosophical problems to do you see in your favorite anime? *picks up coffee and coughs* Talk amongst yerselves. *makes hand gesture to everyone.*
Image
User avatar
Athena
I ♥ the 80's
 
Joined: 02 Mar 2001
Location: Japan
Status: Sad Girl on Mac

Re: Philosophy in Anime

Postby Ishbalan » Mon Nov 30, 2009 10:24 am

tl; dnr
User avatar
Ishbalan
 
Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Location: Worcester, MA
Status: Uncomfortably Ghetto Fabulous

Re: Philosophy in Anime

Postby Dar » Mon Nov 30, 2009 10:51 am

Ishbalan wrote:tl; dnr
Image
Image
User avatar
Dar
yuri addict
 
Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Location: orlando
Status: NEEDS MOAR YURI

Re: Philosophy in Anime

Postby Otohiko » Mon Nov 30, 2009 1:47 pm

wtf is a madoka
Otohiko
 
Joined: 05 May 2003

Re: Philosophy in Anime

Postby Athena » Mon Nov 30, 2009 5:20 pm

Otohiko wrote:wtf is a madoka


Do you not know, or are you making a point about personal identity: "Just who is this character we call Madoka?"
Image
User avatar
Athena
I ♥ the 80's
 
Joined: 02 Mar 2001
Location: Japan
Status: Sad Girl on Mac

Re: Philosophy in Anime

Postby Willen » Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:56 am

Ultimately, I believe Madoka changed because she wanted to. I think that she would have ended up the way she was at the beginning of the first episode regardless of whether Kyosuke went back in time and met her younger self. Based on her relationships with Hikaru, Yusaku, and her various delinquent acquaintances, she is a caring person inside with a strong sense of justice. Even the alternate future Madoka isn't really that far off from the one that we are familiar with.

Still, I have to wonder, since I've recently re-watched episode 36 (where they shoot their amateur film), if Madoka's comment at the end of the episode is foreshadowing.
Having trouble playing back videos? I recommend: Image
User avatar
Willen
Now in Hi-Def!
 
Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Location: SOS-Dan HQ
Status: Melancholy

Re: Philosophy in Anime

Postby Athena » Tue Dec 01, 2009 5:43 am

Willen wrote:Ultimately, I believe Madoka changed because she wanted to. I think that she would have ended up the way she was at the beginning of the first episode regardless of whether Kyosuke went back in time and met her younger self. Based on her relationships with Hikaru, Yusaku, and her various delinquent acquaintances, she is a caring person inside with a strong sense of justice. Even the alternate future Madoka isn't really that far off from the one that we are familiar with.

Still, I have to wonder, since I've recently re-watched episode 36 (where they shoot their amateur film), if Madoka's comment at the end of the episode is foreshadowing.


In this case you make an even stronger case for predestination than I did: you say she would have changed even if Kyosuke did not appear in 1982. The how do you explain parallel-Madoka, where she only seems to change after meeting Kyosuke. Note too alternate Yuu and Hikaru, they are also much worse for the lack of Kyosuke.

Are you suggesting Madoka knew? I've grappled with this myself. Ano Hi does not seem to address this at all, which, despite how much I love it without reference to ESP, I was still surprised by.

You don't have to stick to Madoka's personal identity and free will, unless you feel you have more to add. By all means, produce your own example of philosophy in anime.
Image
User avatar
Athena
I ♥ the 80's
 
Joined: 02 Mar 2001
Location: Japan
Status: Sad Girl on Mac

Re: Philosophy in Anime

Postby hasteroth » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:18 pm

I have to say that there are a few anime that touch on philosophy but the vast majority are purely for entertainment. And most anime that do touch on this subject do not even present original arguments but rather reuse tired old ones.

Now if this was about psychology I could go on and on and on... but my personal philosophy is ridiculously simple and I don't care to analyze the philosophies of others.
<Hacchinya> Stirspeare: ambassador of gaysex
<Stirspeare> Hacchinya: God's own ambassador.
User avatar
hasteroth
lost the bet
 
Joined: 25 Feb 2008
Location: Around
Status: Neither here nor there

Re: Philosophy in Anime

Postby hasteroth » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:19 pm

And if I might point someone towards an anime that could make for interesting discussion (or not, depends on how you see it)

see Welcome to the NHK
<Hacchinya> Stirspeare: ambassador of gaysex
<Stirspeare> Hacchinya: God's own ambassador.
User avatar
hasteroth
lost the bet
 
Joined: 25 Feb 2008
Location: Around
Status: Neither here nor there

Re: Philosophy in Anime

Postby Ishbalan » Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:46 pm

hasteroth wrote:I have to say that there are a few anime that touch on philosophy but the vast majority are purely for entertainment. And most anime that do touch on this subject do not even present original arguments but rather reuse tired old ones.

AKA Here comes another EVA moment.
User avatar
Ishbalan
 
Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Location: Worcester, MA
Status: Uncomfortably Ghetto Fabulous

Re: Philosophy in Anime

Postby Athena » Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:25 am

hasteroth wrote:I have to say that there are a few anime that touch on philosophy but the vast majority are purely for entertainment. And most anime that do touch on this subject do not even present original arguments but rather reuse tired old ones.


Then you are not watching critically enough. Aside from Eva jokes, I look at my source wall, and I see KOR (shown above), Utena, (wow, so many places to go with this one), Maison Ikkoku (philosophy in there, really), Genshiken (oooh, Philosophy OF Fandom, dew eet), Trigun (really now, do I need to mention it), TokiKake (philosophy is at the heart of the entire movie!), BGC (is Priss a Replicant?)... Dude, seriously. Try again.

Now if this was about psychology I could go on and on and on... but my personal philosophy is ridiculously simple and I don't care to analyze the philosophies of others.


This is an improper use of the word philosophy, at least as it relates to the topic at hand. The mundane, common everyday word we toss around (much to the moaning and gnashing of teeth by philosophers, or even serious students of philosophy) does not reflect the meaning of philosophy. Philosophy is not a point of view, rather it is a collection of differing views on a subject or all subjects in the pursuit of knowledge. It literally means the love of knowledge. You may have a particular belief set, and you may even have a reasoned system of arguments for defending your belief set, but you do not "have a philosophy" and nor does anyone else. In fact, I would argue, as would many philosophers, that unless you do have a reasoned system of arguments for defending your belief set, merely having a belief set would not warrant a claim by you that you are participating in philosophy.

tl,dr version- you're using the word wrong, stop that.
Image
User avatar
Athena
I ♥ the 80's
 
Joined: 02 Mar 2001
Location: Japan
Status: Sad Girl on Mac

Re: Philosophy in Anime

Postby hasteroth » Wed Dec 02, 2009 1:12 pm

Kionon wrote:
hasteroth wrote:I have to say that there are a few anime that touch on philosophy but the vast majority are purely for entertainment. And most anime that do touch on this subject do not even present original arguments but rather reuse tired old ones.


Then you are not watching critically enough. Aside from Eva jokes, I look at my source wall, and I see KOR (shown above), Utena, (wow, so many places to go with this one), Maison Ikkoku (philosophy in there, really), Genshiken (oooh, Philosophy OF Fandom, dew eet), Trigun (really now, do I need to mention it), TokiKake (philosophy is at the heart of the entire movie!), BGC (is Priss a Replicant?)... Dude, seriously. Try again.


Listen I don't really watch older anime... except Genshiken. I was referring to newer anime.
<Hacchinya> Stirspeare: ambassador of gaysex
<Stirspeare> Hacchinya: God's own ambassador.
User avatar
hasteroth
lost the bet
 
Joined: 25 Feb 2008
Location: Around
Status: Neither here nor there

Re: Philosophy in Anime

Postby Athena » Thu Dec 03, 2009 1:26 am

hasteroth wrote:Listen I don't really watch older anime... except Genshiken. I was referring to newer anime.


And it doesn't matter. Media doesn't stop having philosophical relevence because its new. Try harder.
Image
User avatar
Athena
I ♥ the 80's
 
Joined: 02 Mar 2001
Location: Japan
Status: Sad Girl on Mac

Re: Philosophy in Anime

Postby Otohiko » Thu Dec 03, 2009 3:14 am

Kionon wrote:
Otohiko wrote:wtf is a madoka


Do you not know, or are you making a point about personal identity: "Just who is this character we call Madoka?"


Just failing at being a sly post-modernist. Or something.

I think most of what you said about the character still falls under the realm of psychology rather than philosophy - predestination and causality are interesting to toy around with but, imho, are philosophical dead ends. In anime, it's probably fair to consider - coming from Japan you generally will see a lot more allusions to, if not outright beliefs in, predestination - but imho it's increasingly just becoming a plot device. Japanese pop culture is quickly heading to the same way as most of the rest of the (post-)modern world. Why is (capitalized) "Free Will" important in this case, anyway? Is this not just about looking at her history and seeing how her history gives her certain motivations and choices? That right there is the realm of psychoanalysis, not philosophy as such.

I've not yet really seen anime that's been all that interesting philosophically - anime is good at headfuck. Philosophy probably not so much.
Otohiko
 
Joined: 05 May 2003

Re: Philosophy in Anime

Postby Sukunai » Thu Dec 03, 2009 12:30 pm

I am thinking I am likely failing to realize the 'point' of the thread, but I will say, nice post OP.

I watch anime for a variety of reasons, and the lowest on the list is because I get to see teenage schoolgirls flash their panties :)
I do NOT watch it because their ample sized breasts bounce around enthusiastically. Nope, I do NOT watch it for the occasional detail lacking nude shot of a teenage schoolgirl.

I don't hate those scenes, but I'd still enjoy anime if none of that was ever present.

I watch it for the complicated romances, the struggles to find love. I watch it to share the joys and the heart aches with the characters. To laugh at the things that make them laugh and to cry with them over the things that bring them sorrow.

I watch anime to escape the real world's all too often overwhelming ugliness. Because sadly I am too familiar with some of humanity's ugliest moments. And even when anime attempts to portray the real world, I can still know, it's just a video and not actually the actual real world.

I've been able to watch all manner of anime series that even when they normally focus on the idiotic, the socially questionable in content, they still manage to occasionally make a decent statement during one or more shows that redeems them in the end all for that small moment when they spoke to me of something useful.

Anime attempts to speak to me, as opposed to the norm of North American cartoons which really is rarely interested in acknowledging me at all.

We all have 'issues' and anime possesses openly so many series that don't shy away from the socially challenging issues.
We like to pretend that we are not homophobic in society, and yet only anime is willing to admit, yes, some people DO like to seek intimate relations with the same gender. Death does happen, and yes, people DO die in anime shows. Anime is not afraid to confront religion.

Anime to me is more than just a form of art that separates it from 'cartoons'.
I have yet to see much if any at all of mainstream cartoons that accomplish even a fraction of what is the norm of anime. It's only been the last few years that feature animated non anime films have even made the effort to break out of the Bugs Bunny Wile coyote slapstick comedy mold.
Anime, one of the few things about the internet that doesn't make me hate the internet.
User avatar
Sukunai
 
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Location: Ontario Canada

Next

Return to General Anime

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest