OzzieAlThor79 wrote:Could someone explain to me why I should think it's okay to masterbate to girls that look like their 12-15 years old?
That would help me understand the points of view expressed in this thread up till now.
I'm not arguing in favour of loli, just so we are clear on that.
That said though, it's more a case of cultural acceptance in some cases and not whether it is right or wrong.
Granted, in my reality, which matters to me even if it matters to know one else, a 'child' is a person UNDER 13. Anyone 13 and older hasn't been labeled a child anywhere else, so I don't see the point of making it the case in this one instance (where sex is concerned). For instance, don't expect your 14 year old child to get a concession at a restaurant where children eat free. Oh you will be most assuredly told your child is really a youth/teen/minor, but sure not a child.
Child=kid and frankly loli=child=kid as far as I am concerned.
Kids generally are not sexually developed, sexually aware or sexually ready.
But I can assure you, today's 13/14/15/16/17 year olds are as sexually capable as any 20/30/40 year old.
How do I know? Oh I suppose it's all the knocked up 13-17 year olds that were knocked up by their 13-17 year old boyfriends.
What makes me laugh, is there is essentially no difference between a 13 year old and an 18/19 and 20 year old.
They're all capable of having sex, just not bright enough to know all the problems that come along with it.
Just because society has deemed an 18 year old magically more smarter/responsible than a 13-17 year old, doesn't make it a reality.
Now as for 40 year old guys that actually want to have sex with a 13 year old, hmm I think they are peculiar for a variety of reasons.
The most natable, being I wouldn't actually want a relationship with a 13 year old. I've been around enough teens in my life, I have a 15 year old son.
I can handle talking with them, and that usually takes a lot of effort.
Being intimately involved with one is just crazy, and doesn't even need for it to be illegal for it to be dumb.
I have to agree too, if you can get your rocks off to a picture of a naked imaginary child, you are no different than the guy getting off to the picture of the naked real child. Get over it. No one cares that the picture is imaginary.
But my refusal to agree that child extends beyond 12 is just my refusal to accept that 13-17 year olds are children.
Frankly, I'm used to calling anyone under 30 a child. I might even upgrade that to 40 in a few years.
Anime, one of the few things about the internet that doesn't make me hate the internet.