Patriotism! ... and health care ...?

This forum is for members to discuss topics that do not relate to anime music videos.

Re: Patriotism!

Postby godix » Thu Sep 10, 2009 6:35 pm

guy07 wrote:I just go by what I hear from the news here. I was referring to the general lack of public support for Pres. Obama in the last poll I had seen when I said "nobody" would want it voted in. I think I may have phrased that wrong, my bad. I'm pretty sure the support dropped after the whole "public funded health care is evil" thing went on, so I was guessing they were related.
If I'm wrong feel free to correct me, it's better I know what's actually know what's going on then make up my own conclusions. lol

A) a presidents numbers always go down over the first year or so. At the start, the supporters have hopes of fucking miracles happening and the foes give some benefit of the doubt that he won't be as bad as they fear. No president can do the miracles so his supporters get disillusioned. The foes usually find something to get pissy about, they are his foes after all. So it's pretty typical a presidents numbers fall. It doesn't mean shit though. The *ONLY* poll that makes a bit of difference is on Nov 4th every four years to elect the President. Other than that, fuck it, he's gonna be there until the end of his term regardless. Besides, there's a reason America isn't a direct democracy and protects against tyranny of the majority. The majority is *NOT* automatically right.

B) It could be argued that a lot of Obama's loss of support isn't that Americans don't support health care reform of some sort or another, it's that Obama doesn't seem to support it. Obama has been talking about health care since before he was even elected. Now seven months after his taking office and we *STILL* don't have anything solid to debate. There are four plans being crafted in Congress now, none of which agree with each other and none of which are ready to vote on. Which of the four does Obama support? Who knows. What's Obama's plan? There isn't one. What features does Obama consider vital? I dunno, and I doubt Obama does either. How much will it cost and how will it be paid? No one has figured that out yet. For a man who talks about health care so much, it's astounding how little he's acting on it. If he was serious and knew WTF he was doing, he would have gone to key Congressmen ahead of time and said 'This is what I insist is in it. You can add to it as needed to make deals or whatever, but here's the bare minimum that I refuse to negotiate away.' So at least some of the drop in support is that people who follow politics are starting to realize that Obama fucked up right off the bat.
Image
User avatar
godix
a disturbed member
 
Joined: 03 Aug 2002

Re: Patriotism!

Postby BasharOfTheAges » Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:29 pm

The health care thing says a lot about the U.S. First, you have the ultra-conservatives spewing complete bullshit - making up all sorts of things to scare the right-wing bible-thumpers into action. On the other side you have the entire democratic party split into several camps, each wanting or liking different parts and absolutely hating others. Then you have the general public that, as the general public is wont to do over most issues of social parity, divide themselves into two camps. Those with money and healthcare that don't want to pay for those without, and those without money or healthcare (or both) that very much want it and wouldn't care if those that were better off then them paid for it.

All the loud talking heads and issue-inventing on both sides just give more talking-point style rhetoric to any "debate" in Washington. It's all fluff. Any political issue that involves taxes is entirely based on the underlying root issue that a lot of old(er) people with money think that they shouldn't be paying for the benefit of others, a large number of young(er) people without money think they should, and the super-rich (that actually have the money) either ignore the whole thing, buy politicians, or start charities.

Any issue or topic is just a new venue to rehash the same conflicting viewpoints. Most modern issues that come up in politics are just proxy debates. We fight back and forth on stemcell research because pro-lifers are butthurt they lost roe v. wade. We fight over textbooks because of past victories on both sides. We fight the same damn debates over and over as mini proxy wars so we never lose an argument, just simply prolong the outcome by splitting hairs, changing terms, and fighting on until we die. No wonder there's voter apathy and a general hatred of politics... it's like a damn internet flame war that goes on forever.
Another Anime Convention AMV Contest Coordinator 2008-2014 & Head of the AAC Fan-works Theater - follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/AACFanTheater
:sorcerer: :sorcerer: |RD: "Oh, Action!" (side-by-side) | |
User avatar
BasharOfTheAges
Just zis guy, you know?
 
Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Location: Merrimack, NH
Status: Extreeeeeeeeeme

Re: Patriotism!

Postby EvaFan » Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:50 am

I think its funnier to show the national debt in numbers then talk about health care so here goes:

Last time I checked the national debt was 11.some number trillion dollars. K so now the math.

11,000,000,000,000/304,000,000 = 36,184$ per person?

So anyone got 36,184$ lying around some where?

America needs to learn that you can't solve money problems by borrowing more money.

As for everything else in this thread/about this thread, refer to sig.
"The people cannot be [...] always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented, in proportion to [...] the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions, it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to public liberty. What country can preserve its liberties, if it's rulers are not warned [...] that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants."-Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
EvaFan
 
Joined: 21 Mar 2004
Location: Somerset, KY
Status: (*゚▽゚)o旦~ ー乾杯ー♪

Re: Patriotism!

Postby Athena » Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:53 am

Eva-Fan wrote:So anyone got 36,184$ lying around some where?


Yes. In my Certificates of Deposit.

I strongly believe in a public option, preferably one that allows any American to choose to be on the same plan as Congress gets. I certainly have no current need of a public option (although I am on the Japanese public option), I can certainly afford my own. I, however, am willing to have my overseas income taxed at a higher rate in order to see this public option exist. As someone who is extremely well off, it is the least I can do and still sleep soundly at night. My reasons are very personal, and have a lot to do with how the private sector treated my biological father before he finally succumbed to a heart condition he battled all his life.

I frankly do not care how Congress gets it done, what deals have to be made. I just want an option that every American has the right to be covered by. And fuck the tight-fisted bastards who do not see that social welfare is a duty and an obligation of citizenship, and not some sort of optional "do it when I feel like" choice.
Image
User avatar
Athena
I ♥ the 80's
 
Joined: 02 Mar 2001
Location: Japan
Status: Sad Girl on Mac

Re: Patriotism!

Postby EvaFan » Fri Sep 11, 2009 7:17 am

You seem to of misinterpreted the means of my last post. I'm not against a "public option" or healthcare at all.

IMO: If the government was to control anything I think it would of been healthcare from the very beginning. There should not be profit when it comes to a person’s life/wellbeing, ever. This is why we have firemen, policemen, etc... I would consider this a "serving the public peace" job therefore government controlled to the point of they pay doctors just like they pay policemen etc. and run non-profit hospitals. There would be pay-grades for different kinds of doctors etc... Honestly I’d rather just pay more tax then having to pay a healthcare premium all together.

I'm simply saying the thinking: "Ok, how much money we gonna need to fix this problem" instead of "Ok, what can we do about this problem before bringing money into the equation" seems to be the american ideology.
"The people cannot be [...] always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented, in proportion to [...] the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions, it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to public liberty. What country can preserve its liberties, if it's rulers are not warned [...] that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants."-Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
EvaFan
 
Joined: 21 Mar 2004
Location: Somerset, KY
Status: (*゚▽゚)o旦~ ー乾杯ー♪

Re: Patriotism!

Postby Athena » Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:27 am

I wasn't directing that at you, I was, in a way, directing it past you. A public option need not cost us a higher debt if we would just stop bitching about paying for it. That was my whole point. In a way I am advocating income distribution of sorts, but not in the way the right wing would have you believe. If you have money, you should be willing to give up a portion of it to help your fellow citizens with, as you say, basics. I believe in a certain basic level of care that is a right of a citizens, and is the fundamental duty of the citizenry as a whole to provide. In the end, we will see a Return on Investment, if that's what the neocons need, because people with healthcare nets and basic preventative care are more productive, but I believe this should be, must be framed as a constitutional argument: the United States was created to provide for the general welfare, and we're not doing a very good job of it.
Image
User avatar
Athena
I ♥ the 80's
 
Joined: 02 Mar 2001
Location: Japan
Status: Sad Girl on Mac

Re: Patriotism!

Postby godix » Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:08 am

Opposition to the public option isn't always about money. I don't support a public option because I've already seen how bad the government is at medical care and I don't hate humanity enough to want to inflict that on them. Due to my wife, over the last four years I've had close dealings with medicare, medicaid, SSI, and SSD. At times I have honestly wondered if the government sat down, looked at my wife's paperwork, and said 'Hey, she's bipolar and has suicidal tendencies. Maybe if we fuck with her long enough she'll kill herself and save us the expense of helping her'. Intellectually I realize no one in the government did that, but if someone did then they couldn't have done a better job screwing with her than they were already doing. I'll spare you the details, but the long and short of it is that it took three years of constant fighting, two appeals, and sixteen hospitalizations before the government would admit my wife has a problem. Oddly enough, when I became unemployed because I missed too much work caring for my wife, the dept of unemployment understood and worked with me on it. I actually had to go to a government dept that has nothing to do with health care to get any assistance resulting from my wife's health care issues.

That being said, I am a huge supporter of medical reform. Don't have the government provide health care, but more (and different) regulation of private health care is desperately needed. Unfortunately, the two groups that really need their balls crushed by the rocks of regulation won't be reformed. Both the pharmaceutical industry and the lawyers buy off too many politicians for anything effective to be done about them. Knocking the insurance industry about the head is a good start though, and actually might end up happening.
Image
User avatar
godix
a disturbed member
 
Joined: 03 Aug 2002

Re: Patriotism!

Postby downwithpants » Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:49 am

BasharOfTheAges wrote: Those with money and healthcare that don't want to pay for those without, and those without money or healthcare (or both) that very much want it and wouldn't care if those that were better off then them paid for it.

Actually republican congressmen are mainly from the south and midwest, which are made up of lower-income constituents than those of the blue states of the north and west coast. the lower income population shows more opposition a social healthcare system while the higher income population is more in favor.

It's like the issue of national security after 9/11. The Midwest and South were for dept of homeland security, sacrificing privacy rights for national security, etc, while most of the coastal states, where a terrorist would most likely enter the US, were opposed.

I'm simply saying the thinking: "Ok, how much money we gonna need to fix this problem" instead of "Ok, what can we do about this problem before bringing money into the equation" seems to be the american ideology.

it's not a question about how much money you can throw at health care. you can throw all the money you want at health care, and you will still need more money to handle treatment costs, research and upgrading equipment. it's like asking, "how much do we have to pay to stop getting sick," it's impossible, there is no limit. it's not like a fire, where once you put out the flames your job is done. we're trying to maintain a decent level of care without letting costs skyrocket.

while i do recognize that guaranteeing coverage for all citizens can reduce medical costs by promoting preventative care and reducing costly ED visits, i don't support a government-run option for reasons similar to godix's. 9/10 government workers spend their entire working day playing solitaire. i would rather receive care from a system that is motivated by profit. one of the current problems is that the current system profits by providing treatment, not by ensuring patient wellness. so doctors that overprescribe will just make off with more money.
User avatar
downwithpants
BIG PICTURE person
 
Joined: 03 Dec 2002
Location: storrs, ct
Status: out of service

Re: Patriotism! ... and health care ...?

Postby guy07 » Fri Sep 11, 2009 5:07 pm

Thread name fix'd.
User avatar
guy07
 
Joined: 08 Sep 2003
Location: T.O.
Status: Back in beard.

Re: Patriotism!

Postby Athena » Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:04 pm

downwithpants wrote:while i do recognize that guaranteeing coverage for all citizens can reduce medical costs by promoting preventative care and reducing costly ED visits, i don't support a government-run option for reasons similar to godix's. 9/10 government workers spend their entire working day playing solitaire. i would rather receive care from a system that is motivated by profit. one of the current problems is that the current system profits by providing treatment, not by ensuring patient wellness. so doctors that overprescribe will just make off with more money.


Godix and I have discussed our opposing views elsewhere in a very detailed fashion. Suffice to say, the trouble he has had with is wife, is the trouble my family had with my dad. The private sector refused to help him. Not because they couldn't, but because they wouldn't. Luckily my mother was hired by Illinois and had a state plan the covered her as well as both my dad and me.

The private sector is too motivated by profits. They can do it better, but they refuse to. Give us a public option so we can say to the industry, "Oh really? Well fuck you, then I'll just go your new competitor, the public option, even though I could afford more reasonable coverage from you if you bothered to provide it." You think government workers hardly work? I don't think the many hydra heads of the insurance industry have done very much work at all.
Image
User avatar
Athena
I ♥ the 80's
 
Joined: 02 Mar 2001
Location: Japan
Status: Sad Girl on Mac

Re: Patriotism!

Postby BasharOfTheAges » Sat Sep 12, 2009 12:07 am

downwithpants wrote:
BasharOfTheAges wrote: Those with money and healthcare that don't want to pay for those without, and those without money or healthcare (or both) that very much want it and wouldn't care if those that were better off then them paid for it.

Actually republican congressmen are mainly from the south and midwest, which are made up of lower-income constituents than those of the blue states of the north and west coast. the lower income population shows more opposition a social healthcare system while the higher income population is more in favor.

Liberal ideals have always trended from the wealthy that feel charitable and the young idealoges that don't have any money to tax away while conservative ideals rest hardily with people that have money (the non-philanthropic parts of the middle and upper middle class) and feel they worked for it so it should be theres to do with as they see fit. Maybe my observational bias stems from being around so many middle class Republicans, but there's the ones that that I see pissed at taxes to fund the public good. I don't disagree there are a number of relatively poor republicans, but they are mostly pulled from insular, often biggoted, groups that don't agree on social welfare projects because they provide benifits to everyone - like other groups (racial, ethnic, age-based, gender-based, etc. etc.) that they hate.

Then there are people like godix and kionon here who base their opinions on something personal to them. While anecdotal reasoning is highly biased and often results in non-measured judgment, you can't fault humans for making their minds up when they have so much resentment built up over an issue.
Another Anime Convention AMV Contest Coordinator 2008-2014 & Head of the AAC Fan-works Theater - follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/AACFanTheater
:sorcerer: :sorcerer: |RD: "Oh, Action!" (side-by-side) | |
User avatar
BasharOfTheAges
Just zis guy, you know?
 
Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Location: Merrimack, NH
Status: Extreeeeeeeeeme

Re: Patriotism! ... and health care ...?

Postby EvaFan » Sat Sep 12, 2009 2:26 am

The way I look at it is if there is profit in the equation you cannot call it health"care", cause they won't care unless there is profit to be made. Your personal problems were just considered business risks by the private sector and deemed potentially non-profitable. That's why if you take profit out then the only thing left to care about is health. Nothing good can come from profit and health related issues.
"The people cannot be [...] always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented, in proportion to [...] the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions, it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to public liberty. What country can preserve its liberties, if it's rulers are not warned [...] that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants."-Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
EvaFan
 
Joined: 21 Mar 2004
Location: Somerset, KY
Status: (*゚▽゚)o旦~ ー乾杯ー♪

Re: Patriotism! ... and health care ...?

Postby Athena » Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:18 pm

Eva-Fan wrote:The way I look at it is if there is profit in the equation you cannot call it health"care", cause they won't care unless there is profit to be made. Your personal problems were just considered business risks by the private sector and deemed potentially non-profitable. That's why if you take profit out then the only thing left to care about is health. Nothing good can come from profit and health related issues.


Precisely. Healthcare is a right, not a luxury. We have no problem in America thinking that we all need to pay for roads because we all use them. We have no problem paying for state level education, because we either choose to send our kids to public school, or we get a tax break because we choose to send our kids to private school (but a tax break never eliminates taxes completely). We all pay for police protection, even when we live in gated communities, and we all pay for a fire department. I will always believe that these concepts, healthcare, education, roads, social security, and police/fire protection are guaranteed us by the constitution under the heading "general welfare." We have enough of a fight on our hands between healthcare and education, and I think local governments do well with roads/police/fire in conjunction with the federal government... but don't even get me started on the inadequacy of a Worst of Both Worlds system we have with the patchwork education found in the US. Since education falls under general welfare, and the Fed has passed all sorts of laws that semi-sorta half-assedly wrestle accountability (in theory) from the states anyway, it's time to nationalise it too, like all the other successful first world countries that keep kicking our asses in test scores.
Image
User avatar
Athena
I ♥ the 80's
 
Joined: 02 Mar 2001
Location: Japan
Status: Sad Girl on Mac

Re: Patriotism! ... and health care ...?

Postby godix » Sat Sep 12, 2009 2:19 pm

Eva-Fan wrote:The way I look at it is if there is profit in the equation you cannot call it health"care", cause they won't care unless there is profit to be made. Your personal problems were just considered business risks by the private sector and deemed potentially non-profitable. That's why if you take profit out then the only thing left to care about is health. Nothing good can come from profit and health related issues.


Economics isn't your strong suit is it? Just because something is for profit does not mean it is also bad for the end user. In theory, for profit is better since it encourages competition to provide the same services at lower prices. In fact, I've heard people argue that a lot of the US health care problem might be viewed as the competition and costs are hidden from the end user. Most people get health care through their work. That means competition is limited since people can only pick whatever their job provides and the costs are somewhat hidden for the end user since work generally picks up at least some of the tab. If the US system were more capitalistic and the end user had control over the choices and costs then that'd encourage competition which would eliminate some of those inefficiencies in the system that Obama says costs oh so much. I don't completely buy into that argument, but it is at least something worth thinking about.

Kionon wrote:Precisely. Healthcare is a right, not a luxury.

No, it is not a right. Look at all the other things Americans consider to be rights: free speech, free religion, life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, right to own firearms, assembly, due process before the law, etc. One of the common things about all every right I just listed, and all the ones I didn't that you can look up in the Constitution on your own, is that they require nothing of other people. You can speak, but I'm not required to listen to provide you a forum. You can own a gun, but I'm not required to buy it for you. You can practice your religion, but I'm not required to endorse or pay for it. Etc. Now look at healthcare. The term, as we're using it here, requires others to do something for you. If healthcare is a right, that means you are within your rights to force another person to be your doctor. To force other people perform tests, surgeries, etc. To force people to develop and provide you medicine. To force other people to spend trillions paying for it all. If it is a right, it would be the only one in the US that flat out forces other people to do something, even if it's against their will. I fail to see how forcing other people to do what I want is a 'right'. That type of thinking is straight out of the royalty entitlement mentality that the US is founded in opposition to.

Healthcare also isn't a luxury. It's a need, the same as food, water, and housing are. Note that those three things are not considered rights either.

Also of note about your examples of education, roads, etc. None of them are rights. Try telling Harvard that education is your right so they can't deny you entrance just because you had a 1.5 GPA in High School. Explain to the police officer who pulled you over that you don't have a drivers license or insurance, but you have the right to roads so they can't stop you from driving 150 MPH in a school zone. Police and fire come a little closer to rights, but there have actually been lawsuits over that and the courts decision was that police are not obligated to respond to your call. All of your examples are entitlements that most Americans agree with and are willing to pay for, they are *NOT* rights. Health care may or may not be one of those entitlements that Americans are willing to pay for, but don't make the mistake of thinking it must be provided. Legally and ethically, you are not entitled to force other people to do what you want.
Image
User avatar
godix
a disturbed member
 
Joined: 03 Aug 2002

Re: Patriotism! ... and health care ...?

Postby kenisama » Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:44 pm

I say, if you want free health care... join the military... you want it free for life... retire from the military.

Otherwise, we live in the land of opportunity, there's nothing stopping you from working hard in life and achieving what you want and being able to afford health care. If your job sucks and you can't afford it... sorry for you, you shouldn't have been cutting up in class and just expecting to get a free ride.

And if you DID work hard and payed attention in school and still don't have health care, sorry for you to, shouldn't have bought that expensive sports car and the fancy big screen TV to obtain the social status you desire.

People need to prioritize their needs over their wants and stop expecting someone to bail them out after they mess up. Take ownership over your own lives.
George Orwell wrote:People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
User avatar
kenisama
 
Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Location: All Around the World and Back
Status: Ahh Yeah!!!

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest