The War on Drugs in America

This forum is for members to discuss topics that do not relate to anime music videos.

The War on Drugs in America

Postby requiett » Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:14 am

If you're an American citizen, do you agree with the fact that America is spending $2,415,000,000 every year to wage war on its own citizens? I was appalled when I read the budget for the DEA on its own website.

http://www.dea.gov/agency/staffing.htm

While I do agree that there should be some manner of substance regulation for the general welfare and safety of people, this is hinging on totalitarianism. More and more warrantless searches are being conducted on a daily basis in the name of fighting the "tyranny" of drugs.

I do not take the concept of constitutional rights lightly. Yet, it is being shredded before our very eyes in the name of fighting drugs and terror. The presidential oath even dictates that the job of the president is to DEFEND the Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic.

This should be nothing new to the more observant of you around here, but to those who like to drown themselves in the sideshow media, I would urge you to pay a little more attention, and I don't mean to CNN, Time-Warner, Fox, etc.
User avatar
requiett
 
Joined: 12 May 2003
Location: Alaska

Postby Minion » Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:32 am

i know i'm beating a decaying, almost skeleton horse by saying this, but they should make pot legal in the states.
i can't imagine that it makes up any large percentage of that budget, but shaving off some of it couldn't hurt.

and it may be a stretch by saying this, but some people just starting to use heavier drugs may decide to just smoke pot, since theres no longer any fear of getting caught.
KioAtWork: I'm so bored. I don't have class again for another half hour.
Minion: masturbate into someones desk and giggle about it for the remaining 28 minutes
User avatar
Minion
 
Joined: 22 May 2004
Location: orlando

Postby Minion » Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:36 am

and i realize that post has little to do with the original post
KioAtWork: I'm so bored. I don't have class again for another half hour.
Minion: masturbate into someones desk and giggle about it for the remaining 28 minutes
User avatar
Minion
 
Joined: 22 May 2004
Location: orlando

Postby godix » Sun Mar 04, 2007 3:58 am

Personally I think the answer is easy. Legalize and tax most drugs, boom instant profit and fewer victimless criminals in jail. Some drugs would need to stay illegal of course and we'd still have all the problems of illegal drug trade. So what you do is first change immigration laws so anyone who wants to can come to this country provided they're not a health risk or guilty of crimes in their home country that are also illegal in the US. Then you give border patrol the authority to shoot to kill. After all, the only ones coming in illegally would be health risk and criminals. Then switch the entire nation over to nuclear power. Take the nuclear waste and cover the entire mexico/us border with it. Once a month or so drive along the radioactive border and collect all the bullet ridden bodies. Mulch em up and use em to build up New Orleans above water. Sure, NOLA would be radioactive but glow in the dark streets would just add to the mardi gras celebrations and it's not like the citizens have much of an IQ that'd be hurt by the radioactivity anyway.

There ya go. How to solve drug smuggling, lower the crowded prison population, end illegal immigrant arguments once and for all, get rid of polluting coal power plants, get rid of nuclear waste, and prepare NOLA for the next hurricane. I might also point out I'm actually mostly serious up to nuclear waste/NOLA part.
Image
User avatar
godix
a disturbed member
 
Joined: 03 Aug 2002

Postby Arigatomina » Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:13 am

The nice thing about the 'war on drugs' is that it allows the same disregard of rights as the 'war on terrorism' - but more people are willing to ignore the price tag and lost rights if they think it's to keep kids from shooting up. This way they can use the money for both "wars" to foot the terrorism fund.

I don't believe there is a war on drugs. The price tag keeps going up because drug use keeps increasing and "concerned parents" keep approving increases to remove themselves from blame for raising delinquents. I'd be very surprised if even a fraction of that amount is spent on reducing drug use. As long as the drug use keeps increasing, they can keep raising that slush fund.

Then again, I live in Indiana. Meth is so common here 2 in 10 families have someone making it in their homes and everyone (cops included) know which 2 are the ones doing it. The local police have been bitching about the lack of funds for years without a single increase. We have more non-fatal accidents from meth labs exploding than we do from car wrecks. And since most of those involve people on welfare, it's getting more expensive every year. If we actually had a few billion in funds to fight this sort of thing, you'd think $50 might make it over here to pay a cop to make a house-call bust now and then.
User avatar
Arigatomina
 
Joined: 03 Apr 2003

Postby CodeZTM » Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:22 pm

Scary. My Comp class just had a huge 3 week essay ramage on this same topic. The biggest argument was totally missed. The huge budget it costs to deal with drugs. Personally, I believe that any and all tobacco/alchohol companies should be blow up, ashes burned, put into a clay pot, thrown into a volcano, and then blowing up the volcano.... But I doubt that will happen, so let's just minimize our already huge debt, and just let the idiots learn from their mistakes. :roll:
User avatar
CodeZTM
Spin Me Round
 
Joined: 03 Mar 2006
Location: Arkansas
Status: Flapping Lips

Postby madbunny » Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:50 pm

code_chrono wrote:Scary. My Comp class just had a huge 3 week essay ramage on this same topic. The biggest argument was totally missed. The huge budget it costs to deal with drugs. Personally, I believe that any and all tobacco/alchohol companies should be blow up, ashes burned, put into a clay pot, thrown into a volcano, and then blowing up the volcano.... But I doubt that will happen, so let's just minimize our already huge debt, and just let the idiots learn from their mistakes. :roll:


Xenu already tried that millions of years ago, and his problem is still around.
Build a man a fire, and he will be warm for a night. Set a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
User avatar
madbunny
 
Joined: 17 Jun 2003

Postby Shazzy » Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:35 pm

Arigatomina wrote:
Then again, I live in Indiana. Meth is so common here 2 in 10 families have someone making it in their homes


Is it just me or is there a correlation between suburban ennui and drug use?
AMV guides for Mac users
DOWNLOAD THIS AMV
Quarter-life crisis: a sense that everyone is, somehow, doing better than you.
User avatar
Shazzy
 
Joined: 12 Jun 2004
Location: The Universe

Postby Arigatomina » Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:05 pm

Shazzy wrote:Is it just me or is there a correlation between suburban ennui and drug use?

Maybe. I think it's that small communities have fewer voters so they don't matter. When you hear about drug problems it's a big city crammed full of voters and reporters. The difference is publicity. It might be easier to buy the expensive stuff in a big city, but you have to watch your back to make sure there isn't a cop spying on the deal. In a small town you can make whatever you want in your own home, invite the neighbors over for some fun, and it doesn't matter who knows about it because they can't afford to get a warrent.

The best they've done here is set a legal limit on over the counter drugs containing ephedrine to one packet per day per customer. That just means a home brewer has to go to a few gas stations to get enough ingredients instead of buying it all in one trip, and people with asthma have to get a prescription instead of getting their drugs 4 for $1 over the counter. :roll: I think there's a problem when we have to make laws to limit the ingredients because we can't afford to arrest the offenders.
User avatar
Arigatomina
 
Joined: 03 Apr 2003

Postby slackergirl » Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:31 am

godix wrote:Personally I think the answer is easy. Legalize and tax most drugs,


Technically speaking, most drugs are legal, so long as you are properly liscenced to prescribe them. They're only illegal if you get them without a prescription.

I also think that you are perhaps overlooking a good chunk of the DEAs time and effort: regulating and monitoring the medical community. Trust me, it needs monitoring.

Also, my big argument against legalizing pot would be that there's no quick, reliable "blood pot level" test to weed out (pun intended) the ****tards who think driving high is a good idea. And you can't deny that number would go up if pot were more readily available. (Not that it isn't pretty easy to get as is...)

Just my 2 cents. Take it for what it's worth.
User avatar
slackergirl
 
Joined: 12 May 2001
Location: Historic NJ, USA

Postby godix » Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:49 am

slackergirl wrote:Also, my big argument against legalizing pot would be that there's no quick, reliable "blood pot level" test to weed out (pun intended) the ****tards who think driving high is a good idea. And you can't deny that number would go up if pot were more readily available. (Not that it isn't pretty easy to get as is...)

Just my 2 cents. Take it for what it's worth.

We don't need no test to tell if someone is driving if they're high, we need a test to see if someone is capable of driving regardless of the reason. I mean if we're honestly concerned about safety then lets make some rules based on safety for a damned change. No driving unless your reaction time is better than X. No driving while your depth perception is worse than Y. No driving while your vision is impaired beyond Z. Test and find out what values X Y and Z should be, then pass the fucking law. Then forget about outlawing driving while high on pot and nullify any laws about driving while drunk. If they're high/drunk enough they can't pass the standard then they get nailed. If they can pass the standard then what does it matter how much they drank/smoked? And yes, I'm fully aware this some people who haven't touched a drop or smoked a joint would get caught. Good. If they don't know how to drive they're every bit as dangerous as a pot head behind the wheel.
Image
User avatar
godix
a disturbed member
 
Joined: 03 Aug 2002

Postby slackergirl » Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:14 am

point conceded
User avatar
slackergirl
 
Joined: 12 May 2001
Location: Historic NJ, USA

Postby guy07 » Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:16 pm

godix wrote:Personally I think the answer is easy. Legalize and tax most drugs, boom instant profit and fewer victimless criminals in jail.

Ditto, Make the same laws with the drugs as you do booze, no drugs and driving,don't go to work on drugs ext. That's way too much money spent on a dead topic, hell if i legalize it, half the drug dealers will go broke. win win, cept for catholics and scientologists :p
User avatar
guy07
 
Joined: 08 Sep 2003
Location: T.O.
Status: Back in beard.

Postby slackergirl » Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:37 pm

guy07 wrote: win win, cept for catholics and scientologists :p


And of course, cept for the people who kill themselves doing drugs!
User avatar
slackergirl
 
Joined: 12 May 2001
Location: Historic NJ, USA

Postby Beowulf » Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:19 pm

What slackergirl fails to notice is that people are by and large, completely capable of driving while stoned. People can NOT drive when they have drank a certain amount of alcohol. After smoking 2 joints, people can still drive fine.

Also the reason drugs, and particularly heroin, will NEVER be legalized in this country is because the government makes a ton of money selling them. End of story.

Its not going to happen.
User avatar
Beowulf
 
Joined: 27 Feb 2002
Location: in the art house

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fire_Starter and 1 guest