
godix wrote:By the way, just because it amused me to check, time between announcing Pro finals were up and whining about them: 42 minutes.
Brakus wrote:Well, looks like my Pro video struck out yet again this year. What does it say about your video when it does well with the general public but wasn't worth nary a mention among your peers? And what does it say about me that some videos that I thought shouldn't have been in finals made it in anyway? We must have very converging opinions about each other's work, I guess.
Sephiroth wrote:This year was decent, the complaints about this year didn't seem as bad as previous ones and hey people actually spent a lot of space talking about the videos. I think this year had the most reviews of any year Ive seen for the contest.
BasharOfTheAges from AWA Pro discussion thread wrote:Sn0wcrash wrote:I suppose the expo is not as exciting as the pro contest...
But there is still 5 awarded categories if I remember ?
That's neither here nor there though... the topic is "AWA Pro video discussion" - it's in the thread title.
In general, however, there are usually enough applicable entries to predict awards in the areas of Best Action, Best Comedy, Best Drama, Best Romance, and a traditional "Grand Prize," given to the most successfully inventive, surprising, or unconventional presentation in the field.
sn0wcrash wrote:The rules on AWA webiste say:In general, however, there are usually enough applicable entries to predict awards in the areas of Best Action, Best Comedy, Best Drama, Best Romance, and a traditional "Grand Prize," given to the most successfully inventive, surprising, or unconventional presentation in the field.
So are there sub-awards in each areas to get around 20 awards ?


GloryQuestor wrote:Traditionally, in addition to the basic category awards, AWA's judging staff has always picked out videos in Expo that they want to give out special awards to. It's basically a form of "Judges' Choice" awards.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests