** We are NO LONGER accepting mp4, for we are not afraid of larger files and the compression makes for bad visual quality.
The following formats will be accepted, provided that they meet the above standards:
...
MPEG 2
MPEG 1
...
Divx avi
Xvid avi
Audio:
...
MPEG audio (mp3, mp2, etc.)
l33tmeatwad wrote:etc etc etc
Deuce Loosely wrote:l33tmeatwad wrote:etc etc etc
Thank you for your expert advice or whatever.
It would have been nice if a bit of civility were exercised here.
Also...you couldn't have PM'd this to me?
I appreciate the input but really...
Iron Solari wrote:I would also like to know which formats, fps, and audio qualities I am required to be working with at this point. It seems undetermined, even though there are some set in stone in the rules. I personally prefer AAC, 23.976-29.97 FPS, and h.264/mp4. They are amazingly easy to understand and deal with and they keep awesome quality.
I understand how compression, storage space, and memory can be a problem especially with FTPs sometimes, but at the same time I can see what l33tmeatwad is saying, in terms of petitioning.
Iron Solari wrote:I would also like to know which formats, fps, and audio qualities I am required to be working with at this point. It seems undetermined, even though there are some set in stone in the rules. I personally prefer AAC, 23.976-29.97 FPS, and h.264/mp4. They are amazingly easy to understand and deal with and they keep awesome quality.
I understand how compression, storage space, and memory can be a problem especially with FTPs sometimes, but at the same time I can see what l33tmeatwad is saying, in terms of petitioning.
29.97 fps -OR- 23.976 fps with 3:2 pulldown
Non-Interlaced video (Progressive scan)
Deuce Loosely wrote:Okay...so I sent a message to the webmasters saying the following:
* delete mpeg1, XVid avi, and DivX avi
* replace the "no mp4" statement with the following:
"mp4 (must be AAC or h264 compression - no exceptions)"
Does this help?
Deuce Loosely wrote:Is there anything else that needs fixing before sending more corrections..?
Deuce Loosely wrote:l33tmeatwad wrote:etc etc etc
Thank you for your expert advice or whatever.
It would have been nice if a bit of civility were exercised here.
Also...you couldn't have PM'd this to me?
I appreciate the input but really...
competitionbros wrote:I have a question about the NSFW contest. One of the rules is "Dubbed sound from licensed commercial translation is NOT allowed." does this mean dubbed anime dialogue etc are not allowed or are things like a sound bite from something like "King of the Hill" not allowed?
Users browsing this forum: BakaOppai and 2 guests