OtakuGray wrote:Sometimes anime can branch out to a younger audience and this is one of those times where you wish children would just go die.
Stirspeare wrote:<Stirspeare> Lopez: Vanquish my virginity and flood me with kit. ["Ladies..."]

Kitsuner wrote:You can be a Pro if you believe~
BasharOfTheAges wrote:Kitsuner wrote:You can be a Pro if you believe~
~: For values of ε > 0.
irriadin wrote:For Pro - So there's no expectation of being a "professional" (as in, "pro" level videos or something like that)?
irriadin wrote:For Pro - So there's no expectation of being a "professional" (as in, "pro" level videos or something like that)?
kholaras wrote:Hrm, something might have been left out in the rules rewrite. In the past (and I assume still, in the spirit of blind judging) the Masters entry was also required to be blinded (for judging purposes) with the option of including a second version with title card info (for public display). I'll ask jingoro to clarify since we're having a staff picnic later today.
kholaras wrote:Second question: The projection capabilities across the convention are being upconverted to better resolutions, but not all rooms are equal. Due to equipment limitations, all entries shown in the main events room (which would be all expo and pro winners plus the majority if not all masters entries) will likely be mastered to DVD at standard resolutions. If you have an HD video, please by all means submit in the highest quality possible. For judging, display in the VAT, and for archival every attempt will be made to display and use the HD version.
jingoro wrote:(...)MPEG-2 as an archive format is going away(...)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests