Best way to handle 1080p footage
- pacotacoshell
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:15 am
Best way to handle 1080p footage
So whenever I try to edit with 1080 sources, it always lags pretty hard most of the time. Frames are constantly skipping in the preview and it makes editing pretty difficult. I even change my project settings to 720p while I edit so it would help with the lag some but it doesn't really work out. So I was wondering if anyone has any tips on how to edit to 1080 footage with a minimal amount of lag. Like if a video container or a certain project setting reduces some of the lag?
I use Sony Vegas Pro 11.
I use Sony Vegas Pro 11.
- Cannonaire
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 5:59 pm
- Status: OVERLOAD
- Location: Oregon
Re: Best way to handle 1080p footage
I would also like to know how people do this.
What I have done so far is bait-and-switch; I make two renders of my source, one in full 1080 (or whatever res I will use for final output) and an intermediate one at a much smaller resolution, maybe 1/3 or 1/4 the resolution. I edit with the lower resolution footage, then when it is time to render (or add resolution-dependent effects) I swap in the full resolution footage. Obviously this requires changing project settings and being very careful about not messing things up. All in all, this is a clunky way to handle things.
What I have done so far is bait-and-switch; I make two renders of my source, one in full 1080 (or whatever res I will use for final output) and an intermediate one at a much smaller resolution, maybe 1/3 or 1/4 the resolution. I edit with the lower resolution footage, then when it is time to render (or add resolution-dependent effects) I swap in the full resolution footage. Obviously this requires changing project settings and being very careful about not messing things up. All in all, this is a clunky way to handle things.
Think millionaire, but with cannons. || Resident Maaya Sakamoto fan.
- Phantasmagoriat
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 11:26 pm
- Status: ☁SteamPunked≈☂
- Contact:
Re: Best way to handle 1080p footage
Yeah, basically what Cannonaire said.
The whole idea is to make two files (with different quality resolutions and/or codecs),
then trick your editor into using whatever file it see's in the file location of your footage.
As long as they look the same frame-by-frame, and have the same name and file extension (like .avi), your editor cannot distinguish between the two files.
You could do it the long way in your timeline, or
(until it comes to rendering... but I usually render on a different computer at home anyway... )
Hope this helps.
~Phan
The whole idea is to make two files (with different quality resolutions and/or codecs),
then trick your editor into using whatever file it see's in the file location of your footage.
As long as they look the same frame-by-frame, and have the same name and file extension (like .avi), your editor cannot distinguish between the two files.
You could do it the long way in your timeline, or
- 1. Close your editor.
2. Switch the file location of your footage with the Real/Proxy file.
3. Re-open your editor, and hope it uses the swapped file in your timeline instead.
4. Edit with the Proxy file. Render with the Real file.
- -Make sure your Proxy file has the same framerate as your Real file.
-Repeat this process as you edit, so you know it is working, ensuring all your frames line up. (You really don't want to botch your whole project...)
-You may need to change your project framesize to match the new file.
-Use something like UTVideo for your Real file, and optionally a different codec for your Proxy (maybe ffdshow's MJPEG...)
-Play with resolution/quality of your proxy file. I've gone as low as 320x180, and it was lightning fast (quality was iffy but good enough for me...)
-If you know a bit of Batch, you can write a script to automate the whole process.
(until it comes to rendering... but I usually render on a different computer at home anyway... )
Hope this helps.
~Phan
Org Profile | AMVGuide | Phan Picks! | THE424SHOW | YouTube | "Painkiller"
"Effort to Understand; Effort to be Understood; to See through Different Eyes."
- BasharOfTheAges
- Just zis guy, you know?
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 11:32 pm
- Status: Breathing
- Location: Merrimack, NH
Re: Best way to handle 1080p footage
It might also be worth figuring out where your bottleneck is (HDD or CPU). I wouldn't recommend SSDs for footage drives with the prices still this high, but striped RAID might speed up your throughput a bit. Also, i'm not sure about Vegas, but AE enjoys having large amounts of RAM to work with. I did something in what amounts to twice the resolution of 8K a while back and it needed 4GB to even load a frame at 1/8 quality.
Post your system's specs if you don't mind.
Post your system's specs if you don't mind.
Anime Boston Fan Creations Coordinator (2019-2023)
Anime Boston Fan Creations Staff (2016-2018)
Another Anime Convention AMV Contest Coordinator 2008-2016
| | |
Anime Boston Fan Creations Staff (2016-2018)
Another Anime Convention AMV Contest Coordinator 2008-2016
| | |
- pacotacoshell
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:15 am
Re: Best way to handle 1080p footage
I googled how to find out what your bottleneck is and it told me to do something, so I took a screen of it.BasharOfTheAges wrote:It might also be worth figuring out where your bottleneck is (HDD or CPU). I wouldn't recommend SSDs for footage drives with the prices still this high, but striped RAID might speed up your throughput a bit. Also, i'm not sure about Vegas, but AE enjoys having large amounts of RAM to work with. I did something in what amounts to twice the resolution of 8K a while back and it needed 4GB to even load a frame at 1/8 quality.
Post your system's specs if you don't mind.
Comp specs
- DJ_Izumi
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2001 8:29 am
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: Best way to handle 1080p footage
Even the Intel HD 3000 on my Sandy Bridge laptop scores 5.9... o.O
That said, GPU is going to have negligible impact on the editing experience. 5.9 on the primary HDD is a pretty decent score. Everything I own, my RAID1 desktop, single drive laptop and my crap box Athlon 64 server all score 5.9 on their HDD scores.
You won't get anything faster without entertaining the usage of an SSD, server grade HDD or RAID0 or RAIDX+0
That said, GPU is going to have negligible impact on the editing experience. 5.9 on the primary HDD is a pretty decent score. Everything I own, my RAID1 desktop, single drive laptop and my crap box Athlon 64 server all score 5.9 on their HDD scores.
You won't get anything faster without entertaining the usage of an SSD, server grade HDD or RAID0 or RAIDX+0
- Eake4
- Australian Zeus
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 6:15 am
- Status: Doing something useless again
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Best way to handle 1080p footage
As phan said, switch between the higher quality version with the lower quality version which would be EXACTLY identical in terms of frame rate.
I thought programs such as vegas and premiere allowed footage switching with same editing?
I thought programs such as vegas and premiere allowed footage switching with same editing?
- Pwolf
- Friendly Neighborhood Pwaffle
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2001 4:17 pm
- Location: Some where in California, I forgot :\
- Contact:
Re: Best way to handle 1080p footage
You also need to take into consideration the source format. Are you using a lossy source that requires a lot of decoding (aka, h264)? Convert your source to a faster lossless codec and try again.
- pacotacoshell
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:15 am
Re: Best way to handle 1080p footage
Yeah, I output my footage on vdub in a lossless lagarith avi. I also heard that xvid was pretty light on the lag on vegas, but all of it is still pretty much the same in terms of lag for me.Pwolf wrote:You also need to take into consideration the source format. Are you using a lossy source that requires a lot of decoding (aka, h264)? Convert your source to a faster lossless codec and try again.
- Pwolf
- Friendly Neighborhood Pwaffle
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2001 4:17 pm
- Location: Some where in California, I forgot :\
- Contact:
Re: Best way to handle 1080p footage
Don't use Xvid for editing, ever. It's also a lossy codec. Lagarith is pretty slow so try huffyuv and see if it's any better. I would suggest UTVideo but apparently there are issues with UTVideo and Vegas (so i'm told).