ayanefan wrote:Pwolf, how is the AviSynth MT working for you? I downloaded but am hesitant to use yet.
I havn't had the time to test it any further.
Sereenie wrote:x2. I'm waiting for further feedback before I dig deeper into this.
S.
I was going to test it out some more when i start my next video but thats been pushed back because i'm moving.
BasharOfTheAges wrote:Having optimized some code for faster performance once or twice I gotta say that's pretty damn impressive. I can't believe that properly utilizing the other thread would yield that big of a performance increase alone - they must have hit on some optimizing techniques while designing it. I'm definitely going to try this out - clipping times (the setting of in and out points) will still take a while, but saving that much time at the last step would be astounding.
Theres some documentation about the multi threading that comes with it but how much of that performance is optimization or multi threading, i dunno.
Sereenie wrote:The filters that can't be used is what worries me a bit. For example, this loses a lot of its appeal if it can't be used with deinterlacers.
S.
Yea, same here. I was going to test it but as i mentioned above, my video is being pushed back until i move and have more time to do it. The cool thing is, you can enable and disable the multi threading or set it to different modes at any time in the script. So, if there is a filter that wont work, you can still use it for others without having it crash.
Qyot27 wrote:Sereenie wrote:The filters that can't be used is what worries me a bit. For example, this loses a lot of its appeal if it can't be used with deinterlacers.
S.
The question is, in such a situation could a chain work instead with at least a reasonable increase in efficiency? Use the Import command to call a script which does the functions that the MT version can't.
Hmm, something that i should test as well. *adds to the list*
Pwolf