HD without the overheads

This forum is for questions and discussion of all the aspects of handling your footage. If you have questions about capturing/ripping footage, AviSynth, or compression/encoding/converting, look here.

HD without the overheads

Postby lister007 » Fri Mar 30, 2007 8:38 am

What is the best codec for hd at the mo? Alot of them have really high overheads, some of the amvs come out jerky you know, what do you think of the new divx hd codec? The jerkyness only happens with some amvs I've seen, not so much with the apple trailers though? any thoughts?
Spatchcock..........A dressed and split chicken for roasting or grilling on a spit.
Bring it
Image
Berserk or crazy...??? (image shack sucks will have a banner for this too when it doesn't!)
User avatar
lister007
 
Joined: 21 Jan 2005
Location: Great Britain, um the country with the best flag;)

Postby Minion » Fri Mar 30, 2007 8:48 am

h.264
KioAtWork: I'm so bored. I don't have class again for another half hour.
Minion: masturbate into someones desk and giggle about it for the remaining 28 minutes
User avatar
Minion
 
Joined: 22 May 2004
Location: orlando

Postby Zarxrax » Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:42 am

Resolution is probably the single biggest factor that affects playback speed. HD resolutions simply require much more processing power to play smoothly than standard definition videos do. Also HD videos contain much more data than a standard resolution video, so you want to compress it more efficiently. H.264 is currently the most efficient encoding format, but also one of the hardest to play back. Fortunately, it is very configurable, so various settings can be tweaked to make a compromise between compression efficiency and processing power required.

Apple uses H.264 for their videos, but their encoder does not contain many advanced options so it can't compress as well as an H.264 encoder like x264 can. As a result, it can also play back on system with slower cpus.

The x264 encoder that everyone uses provides much better compression techniques than apples encoder, and so it requires a stronger cpu to play back using these features. However, x264 is a very configurable codec, and can be set to encode in much the same way as Apple's encoder does.

So in the end it's a tradeoff--do you want a smaller, more efficiently compressed video, or do you want a video that will play on slower cpus? According to your needs, you can configure the settings in x264 how you want them.
User avatar
Zarxrax
 
Joined: 01 Apr 2001
Location: Concord, NC


Return to Footage Help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest