AMVapp Vs K-lite Codec Pack

Locked
User avatar
TriGGiT
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 9:51 pm
Location: Spain
Org Profile

AMVapp Vs K-lite Codec Pack

Post by TriGGiT » Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:52 pm

Now when it comes to codecs wich is a more complete package, i am seeing K-lite Codec Pack as a pretty solid option right now compared to what the AMVapp offers.
what your opinion, i guessing we have to install both to take full advantage right since there are thing the k-lite codec pack doenst have such as teh lagarith codec which is is essential for editing uncompressed.

whats your say on this matter?

User avatar
Zarxrax
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2001 6:37 pm
Location: North Cackalacky
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: AMVapp Vs K-lite Codec Pack

Post by Zarxrax » Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:14 pm

amvapp is not a codec pack!

User avatar
Kariudo
Twilight prince
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:08 pm
Status: 1924 bots banned and counting!
Location: Los taquitos unidos
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: AMVapp Vs K-lite Codec Pack

Post by Kariudo » Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:59 pm

k-lite is a plague, and should be killed. It's gotten better, but it has a bad history of including duplicate codecs and being nigh impossible to remove. Installing multiple codec packs is just asking for trouble. If ffdshow doesn't decode lagarith, then go out and install lagarith.
Image
Image

User avatar
Cannonaire
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 5:59 pm
Status: OVERLOAD
Location: Oregon
Org Profile

Re: AMVapp Vs K-lite Codec Pack

Post by Cannonaire » Fri Nov 19, 2010 12:22 am

If you want to install a good codec pack, try CCCP: http://www.cccp-project.net/
It comes with a decent player, Media Player Classic - Home Cinema.

With that and a few other codecs (namely Lagarith, HuffYUV, and UTVideo), you should be all set to watch just about anything.

I'm sure I'm not the only one here who will recommend this exact solution. I would certainly stay away from K-Lite as well.
Image Think millionaire, but with cannons. || Resident Maaya Sakamoto fan.

User avatar
Cannonaire
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 5:59 pm
Status: OVERLOAD
Location: Oregon
Org Profile

Re: AMVapp Vs K-lite Codec Pack

Post by Cannonaire » Fri Nov 19, 2010 12:35 am

Sorry for the double post, but I forgot to add that you should see if CCCP works for both Lagarith and HuffYUV before you install those seperately. I doubt it has UTVideo built in, but since the release is from last month, might as well try it first.

You can get UTVideo here if needed: http://umezawa.dyndns.info/wordpress/?p=1770 (click the "x86" link).

And just a little more information, if you plan to edit using lossless clips, I highly recommend UTVideo. Compression is almost as good as lagarith, but way faster and also a lot better than HuffYUV. :up:
Image Think millionaire, but with cannons. || Resident Maaya Sakamoto fan.

User avatar
Phantasmagoriat
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 11:26 pm
Status: ☁SteamPunked≈☂
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: AMVapp Vs K-lite Codec Pack

Post by Phantasmagoriat » Fri Nov 19, 2010 1:49 pm

Cannonaire wrote:I'm sure I'm not the only one here who will recommend this exact solution.
Yup. That's pretty much what I do. :amv:
Image
Org Profile | AMVGuide | Phan Picks! | THE424SHOW | YouTube | "Painkiller"

"Effort to Understand; Effort to be Understood; to See through Different Eyes."

Mister Hatt
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2007 8:26 am
Status: better than you
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: AMVapp Vs K-lite Codec Pack

Post by Mister Hatt » Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:17 am

WHY HASN'T ANYONE YELLED ABOUT HOW YOU SHOULD ALL USE DIVX7 TO DECODE AVC YET? Although MainConcept's 10bit AVC decoder is p sweet when it actually works.

Locked

Return to “Video & Audio Help”