Flesh Field Strain MEP

This forum is for the announcement, organisation and discussion of Multi-Editor AMV Projects.

Postby Scott Green » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:44 pm

ArashinomeAMV wrote:
Ryko89 wrote:I think I will have a cute beta done by this sunday. Im making love to the timeline right now. Done processing my footage


Cute isn't what we aim for |:


See wut I did thar? O:

shut up, bitch
ImageImage
Image
User avatar
Scott Green
Greenwhore
 
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Location: Austria
Status: The Dark Tower

Postby Kevmaster » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:44 pm

Scott Green wrote:
ArashinomeAMV wrote:
Ryko89 wrote:I think I will have a cute beta done by this sunday. Im making love to the timeline right now. Done processing my footage


Cute isn't what we aim for |:


See wut I did thar? O:

shut up, bitch


yeah shut up with this faggotry
Kevmaster
Eisenbahnmörser
 
Joined: 28 May 2006

Postby EvaFan » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:40 pm

You know.. I really want to join this but everytime I read the:

Techs & Rules etc... wrote:- Aspect Ratio: 640x480 (letterbox your 16:9 source). You can send me the max quality version (HD), I'll letterbox and resize it, or you can make it by your way.
- Final version must be compressed in Huffyuv or Lagarith.
- 24 fps
- De-interlaced footage (progressive)
- DVD or HD source
- You can choose until 2 Tracks if you really love Flesh Field
- Videogames are allowed.
- If you think that you can do better tracks than the actual editors, then prove it.
- If your video sux, you're out.


The 24fps bothers me alot. I read that your considering 29.97. I'm begging you to change it to ntsc...

There is one other thing that bothers me and that’s the 640x480 letterboxed sources... It bothers me cause your asking for industrial animes (IE CGI animated stuff, basically top of the line crap). This kind of "Top of the line" crap is mostly widescreen nowadays anyways. It would make more sense to make the MEP widescreen.

If your absolutely hellbent on using 4:3 as the final render then I can only suggest you get a 4:3AR(letterboxed) version and a 16:9AR version from all the people with widescreen tracks so you can make a 4:3 version of the MEP with letterboxed widescreen tracks and a 16:9 version of the MEP with letterboxed 4:3 tracks.

Why do I say this? Cause I fully regret it on my MEP(when I was new and not very informed) and I don't want to see it happen to an MEP I want to join :|... Most monitors are 16:9 nowadays anyways and watching this MEP on an HDTV in the future would be awesome.

It's not hard at all really anyways... The 4:3 tracks are only needed at 640x480... The widscreen tracks you need a 640x480(letterboxed) version and a 848x480(Mod16 16:9 close as your gonna get). The 4:3 tracks will fit right in the widescreen version of the MEP without even having to change their size in premiere/vegas/whatever.

K so... now that all that's been said... If you decide to go with 29.97 fps, I'm interested in Track 12 with .hack GU Trilogy Movie and believe me I'm willing to fight for it :twisted: .

Should have plenty of time to wrap other stuff going on up since this mep doesn't have a specific deadline yet and your not in a hurry.

PS. Thx for introducing me to fleshfield regardless :up: .
"The people cannot be [...] always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented, in proportion to [...] the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions, it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to public liberty. What country can preserve its liberties, if it's rulers are not warned [...] that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants."-Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
EvaFan
 
Joined: 21 Mar 2004
Location: Somerset, KY
Status: (*゚▽゚)o旦~ ー乾杯ー♪

Postby Goketsu » Sun Jul 20, 2008 10:01 am

so has anyone else made any more progress 8-)
User avatar
Goketsu
 
Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Location: Texas

Postby Shinnie04 » Sun Jul 20, 2008 10:32 am

Goketsu wrote:so has anyone else made any more progress 8-)


Not yet ><. Stupid school projects and other AMV projects are getting in the way
User avatar
Shinnie04
 
Joined: 01 May 2007
Location: Australia

Postby OnyX DragoN » Sun Jul 20, 2008 5:30 pm

The point of having it at 24 frames per second is because that is IVTC which is a much better interlacing method and a LOT of people don't know how to make 29.97 footage look good. That being said, the 4:3 aspect ratio is to accommodate the video game footage which is not widescreen (as in mine and zet's tracks which is fatal frame, 4:3) There is a reason why undeadborn picked what he did, and I'm sure it would be a horrible loss if you didn't want to join the project, but I think he would get over it. Also, framerate change in the middle of a project is B A D. So I really think that is out of the question anyways. Cheers :D
User avatar
OnyX DragoN
 
Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Status: iunno...cold...I guess =/

Postby CastielTheFallen » Sun Jul 20, 2008 6:28 pm

OnyX DragoN wrote:The point of having it at 24 frames per second is because that is IVTC which is a much better interlacing method and a LOT of people don't know how to make 29.97 footage look good. That being said, the 4:3 aspect ratio is to accommodate the video game footage which is not widescreen (as in mine and zet's tracks which is fatal frame, 4:3) There is a reason why undeadborn picked what he did, and I'm sure it would be a horrible loss if you didn't want to join the project, but I think he would get over it. Also, framerate change in the middle of a project is B A D. So I really think that is out of the question anyways. Cheers :D


Wut he said \:
Image
DZ|BSP
User avatar
CastielTheFallen
Prodigal Pen-Throttle
 
Joined: 17 Apr 2006
Location: Nowheresville, NJ
Status: Sick & Uninspired

Postby Kristyrat » Sun Jul 20, 2008 9:57 pm

ArashinomeAMV wrote:
OnyX DragoN wrote:The point of having it at 24 frames per second is because that is IVTC which is a much better interlacing method and a LOT of people don't know how to make 29.97 footage look good. That being said, the 4:3 aspect ratio is to accommodate the video game footage which is not widescreen (as in mine and zet's tracks which is fatal frame, 4:3) There is a reason why undeadborn picked what he did, and I'm sure it would be a horrible loss if you didn't want to join the project, but I think he would get over it. Also, framerate change in the middle of a project is B A D. So I really think that is out of the question anyways. Cheers :D


Wut he said \:


And the point of having 29.97 fps is to allow tighter sync and cleaner cuts.

They're not both without advantages.
Image
User avatar
Kristyrat
Time-traveling penguin
 
Joined: 26 Sep 2004
Location: Igloo
Status: Lies and fish

Postby EvaFan » Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:07 am

ah well, I tried... GL with the project.

Still though thx for introducing me to em, prolly just gonna solo somethin.
"The people cannot be [...] always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented, in proportion to [...] the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions, it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to public liberty. What country can preserve its liberties, if it's rulers are not warned [...] that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants."-Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
EvaFan
 
Joined: 21 Mar 2004
Location: Somerset, KY
Status: (*゚▽゚)o旦~ ー乾杯ー♪

Postby OnyX DragoN » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:42 am

Kristyrat wrote:
ArashinomeAMV wrote:
OnyX DragoN wrote:The point of having it at 24 frames per second is because that is IVTC which is a much better interlacing method and a LOT of people don't know how to make 29.97 footage look good. That being said, the 4:3 aspect ratio is to accommodate the video game footage which is not widescreen (as in mine and zet's tracks which is fatal frame, 4:3) There is a reason why undeadborn picked what he did, and I'm sure it would be a horrible loss if you didn't want to join the project, but I think he would get over it. Also, framerate change in the middle of a project is B A D. So I really think that is out of the question anyways. Cheers :D


Wut he said \:


And the point of having 29.97 fps is to allow tighter sync and cleaner cuts.

They're not both without advantages.


Now now, don't get me wrong, I actually prefer 29.97. However, changing in the middle of a project is foolish. That was the major point I was going for. Thanks for pointing it out though kristyrat :)
User avatar
OnyX DragoN
 
Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Status: iunno...cold...I guess =/

Postby Goketsu » Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:54 pm

I'll start working on this some more this week. I've been busy with work / other amv projects lately
User avatar
Goketsu
 
Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Location: Texas

Postby Undeadborn » Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:07 pm

Goketsu wrote:I'll start working on this some more this week. I've been busy with work / other amv projects lately


Don't worry I'm f**king busy lately too xD.
User avatar
Undeadborn
 
Joined: 01 Aug 2003
Location: Spain
Status: Zombie

Postby Goketsu » Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:01 pm

Undeadborn wrote:
Goketsu wrote:I'll start working on this some more this week. I've been busy with work / other amv projects lately


Don't worry I'm f**king busy lately too xD.

me 2 X) I've been working too much hopefully I'll have a bit more free time soon cause I really need to start working on it again
User avatar
Goketsu
 
Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Location: Texas

Postby OnyX DragoN » Sun Aug 31, 2008 6:59 pm

is this mep like...still alive? o.o
User avatar
OnyX DragoN
 
Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Status: iunno...cold...I guess =/

Postby Undeadborn » Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:12 pm

OnyX DragoN wrote:is this mep like...still alive? o.o


It will always be alive until the end.
User avatar
Undeadborn
 
Joined: 01 Aug 2003
Location: Spain
Status: Zombie

PreviousNext

Return to Multi-Editor Projects

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest