

Fall_Child42 wrote:Minion wrote:am interested.
We must have All of TIC
Ingow wrote:I don't really see why it has to be one week in that case. If there'd be like a list at the beginning making pairs on who gets what song everyone would be editing at the same time.
Ingow wrote:And I don't see why a MEP that takes more than a week should be a problem considering the months all the others take.
Ingow wrote:I mean if I'd think of it myself even if I'd get a completely complex crazy techno beat audio track I could still decide whether or not I'd want to keep it down to 30secs and if I'd choose that I could spent 2 weeks on working on all the needed sync.
Ingow wrote:And on the other hand slow songs that don't require much sync/editing would be pretty bad in 30seconds, because how much possible cuts are that in a drama video? Like 4, or something? In that case the person editing it could easily go ahead and edit 1:30 and that way both videos would balance each other out.
Ingow wrote:Also, not every right song for this project can be cut into good 30seconds, if the editor could choose which part he could also cut out the part he feels best about editing to so that at least nobody would have to stick to the worst possible 30seconds of a song.
NerdStrudel wrote:The point here is not to become an AMV hell or whatever, The point here, is more or less, to test the limits of your editing abilities. At least, that's how I see it.
wurpess wrote:Well, I know it doesn't solve the problem of people submitting music then dropping, but a way to have everyone edit at once and still have the randomness would be maybe once the list of editors is set in stone, have everyone pm you their audio bit, then randomly redistribute the pieces to the editors. But I agree that it would be more interesting to do the ladder thing and have everyone working in a week or 2 time periods. It gives more of that improv feeling. Kinda along the lines of a less extreme Iron Editor.

Orwell wrote:After much prodding, I have been informed I have a interest in this. And I'll sign up Oto while I'm at it since he should have a computer tonight.

kisanzi wrote:I agree with Ingow, everyone in the project should submit their audio and have it distributed to someone else at the same time. Then everyone can edit their track in the same 2 week or so time period. It'll still be improv but it wont take half a year to finish. I don't really understand why you would want to do this MEP one person at a time anyway.
kisanzi wrote:As for the audio, I'm sure that Crackerz would screen the audio submitted for anything obscenely or blatantly submitted for the purpose of being obnoxious or screwing other editors over. The project wouldn't demand much quality if some editors give great obscure music while others try to submit intentionally crappy or uneditable audio and pass it off as a serious choice.
kisanzi wrote:This project sounds like a way for editors to give themselves reasons to sit down and edit something that won't take them months of brainstorming or editing. But rather, trying their best to represent their skills with alot of good audio that they have never heard. If that's the intention then I'd really like to see this MEP get off the ground.
Return to Multi-Editor Projects
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest