Navras

This forum is for the announcement, organisation and discussion of Multi-Editor AMV Projects.

Postby mikestrife » Mon Jan 02, 2006 6:49 pm

Sorry guys, I was away for new years. Rendering again tonight, going to try a weakening the filter so michele's part looks clearer. I'll also see about fixing that problem in the first section. I know this is getting drawn out for everyone so after these problems are fixed it will be the final version.

Aiming for tonight/tomorrow night at the latest.
User avatar
mikestrife
 
Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Location: Toronto, On

Postby celibi87 » Tue Jan 03, 2006 12:09 am

i feel like a beta tester with all the betas i got on my desktop of this thing XD
User avatar
celibi87
 
Joined: 11 Oct 2004
Location: That one place

Postby mikestrife » Tue Jan 03, 2006 12:10 am

The final beta is in your pm's. I reduced the filter strength and I think your part michele looks better. But everyone let me know if there are any glaring issues. Hopefully it's good to go now.
User avatar
mikestrife
 
Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Location: Toronto, On

Postby celibi87 » Tue Jan 03, 2006 12:35 am

Im really sorry to point this out since we all want to get this thing out to the public. I noticed a little something in my segment.
Image
User avatar
celibi87
 
Joined: 11 Oct 2004
Location: That one place

Postby mikestrife » Tue Jan 03, 2006 12:59 pm

the hell? Hmm. I hope that problem doesn't just move around every time I encode. I'll take a look when I get home from work and see when it turned to that.
User avatar
mikestrife
 
Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Location: Toronto, On

Postby mikestrife » Tue Jan 03, 2006 11:26 pm

Hmm, seems these strange problems appear during the 2nd pass encode. The first pass encode doesn't have the problems.

Any ideas how to prevent this?
User avatar
mikestrife
 
Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Location: Toronto, On

Postby jethropr » Tue Jan 03, 2006 11:44 pm

really? damn, I've never seen that happen during and Xvid encode
User avatar
jethropr
 
Joined: 12 May 2003
Location: Oshawa, Ont

Postby [Mike of the Desert] » Thu Jan 05, 2006 9:46 am

mikestrife wrote:Hmm, seems these strange problems appear during the 2nd pass encode. The first pass encode doesn't have the problems.

Any ideas how to prevent this?


What about don't do it? :)
Ignore me but in my opinion, the 2nd pass isn't this important. With the 1t I think it would be fine.
ImageImage
Image
User avatar
[Mike of the Desert]
 
Joined: 25 Jul 2003
Location: Earth -> Europe -> Italy -> Rome -> Cerveteri -> Sasso -> Home -> Mike's Room
Status: Lonely

Postby mikestrife » Thu Jan 05, 2006 10:16 am

Michele wrote:
mikestrife wrote:Hmm, seems these strange problems appear during the 2nd pass encode. The first pass encode doesn't have the problems.

Any ideas how to prevent this?


What about don't do it? :)
Ignore me but in my opinion, the 2nd pass isn't this important. With the 1t I think it would be fine.


Second Pass is kinda important when the first pass ends up being like 170 megs, lol.

Anyways, I did re-render last night, and I watched it twice and didn't see any more issues, so hopefully we're all good.

I'll send out the link now.
User avatar
mikestrife
 
Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Location: Toronto, On

Postby jethropr » Thu Jan 05, 2006 1:54 pm

Michele wrote:
mikestrife wrote:Hmm, seems these strange problems appear during the 2nd pass encode. The first pass encode doesn't have the problems.

Any ideas how to prevent this?


What about don't do it? :)
Ignore me but in my opinion, the 2nd pass isn't this important. With the 1t I think it would be fine.


oh lordly are you mistaken, the second pass is what keeps your footage quality as it was when your exported it off the timeline, and allows you to compress it down for the masses on the net.
User avatar
jethropr
 
Joined: 12 May 2003
Location: Oshawa, Ont

Postby jethropr » Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:46 am

finally watched the encode, Looks spiffy, didn't notice any errors.
User avatar
jethropr
 
Joined: 12 May 2003
Location: Oshawa, Ont

Postby Coffee 54 » Fri Jan 06, 2006 12:14 pm

jethropr wrote:finally watched the encode, Looks spiffy, didn't notice any errors.


x2. So unless anybody else noticed something, I think we might actually be ready to go.
User avatar
Coffee 54
 
Joined: 11 May 2004

Postby mikestrife » Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:09 pm

nice, I'll give it til tomorrow, then up it goes.
User avatar
mikestrife
 
Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Location: Toronto, On

Postby celibi87 » Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:20 pm

Looks good to me.
User avatar
celibi87
 
Joined: 11 Oct 2004
Location: That one place

Postby DarkSchneider » Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:52 pm

Yeah, definitely
User avatar
DarkSchneider
 
Joined: 24 Aug 2001
Location: A Hole in the ground

PreviousNext

Return to Multi-Editor Projects

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest