I have many years yet till I can do that....I'll leave the Op's after I run through the vids several more times.
:smiles:
Mag Launcher wrote:AbsoluteDestiny wrote:You have a valid viewpoint but you have rudely hijacked the thread which was trying to advertise a video in a honest manner.
If you have an opinion on the video, then leave an opinion. If you have an opinion on amvs in general then post it in the General AMV forum.
Ranting in a thread where someone is trying to advertise the video they worked INCREDIBLY hard on is an insult. Go and take your lack of manners elsewhere.
You have failed to miss something very important...
I don't give a fuck about manners on an amv forum
OmniStrata wrote:Ah, Mag, but what do you say to someone who's done BOTH fx and NON-fx videos?!
Mag Launcher wrote:I hope people didn't think I was diving artists by efx/non-efx. I never said it was bad to use efx but if you're going to use them at leas use them right. Something no one is doing right now.
FirestormXIII wrote:Mag Launcher wrote:I hope people didn't think I was diving artists by efx/non-efx. I never said it was bad to use efx but if you're going to use them at leas use them right. Something no one is doing right now.
So they're using them 'wrong' because you say so? Hmm, interesting. And so who decides what 'wrong' is?
Ohhh, that's right, it's up to the individual to decide. I almost forgot.
Mag Launcher wrote:FirestormXIII wrote:Mag Launcher wrote:I hope people didn't think I was diving artists by efx/non-efx. I never said it was bad to use efx but if you're going to use them at leas use them right. Something no one is doing right now.
So they're using them 'wrong' because you say so? Hmm, interesting. And so who decides what 'wrong' is?
Ohhh, that's right, it's up to the individual to decide. I almost forgot.
You people sure d love your jumping to conclusions and rhetorical questions don't you?
AbsoluteDestiny wrote:Where's Scott when you need him
Users browsing this forum: Rollinge and 3 guests