----------------------------------------------------
xanthrax> lord of evil, you'd deserve to be replied with a "so dou ai"-avatar...but, don't have any webspace, so, can't answer you with hte propoer avatar...too bad. Hmm. anyways, let's get over with it;
as to the comment itself:
-sure thing is the title of the website is "a-m-v.org", not "reviews.com", that's true. However, i do think that reviews are something to care about, on a-m-v.org...they're part of the site, and i guess phade put it up without anyone asking for it, no?...reviews can give a new meaning to a video...it's a new "reading" of it...can be neat...i mean: it's like you're saying analysis of a book isn't worth anything, only the book is worth reading...oh, well...and anyways, everybody's entitled to an opinion...but once again, the point of the thread is not dealing with the "opinion you have of ppl who care about what the site give them feedback about: their 'work' (of writing or editing)".
I mean: you can say having feedback on a review isn't making any sense FOR YOU, but if the system of the site allows it, then, must be because someone else than me found it was important...
-
i wouldn't care much if it was renamed/removed though i wouldn't see the point.
And wouldn't you be so right! Indeed, the point, here, is neither to rename nor remove anything, but to MODIFY it...
-i'm somewhat proud i can contribute the community [...] but i wouldn't claim superiority.
Fine, that's for the best! Neither would i! My point is to know my own limits and improvements about communication, writing skills, and stuff...not to know if i'm SUPERIOR to other ppl and stuff...
c'me on! get over with that "oh! look how big the ego of these ppl who care about opinions given about their review is big!"-thing!...
I've not began the thread to be "pointed by the finger".
If you can't get that i'm talking about the subject, please, ignore the topic, that's all!
-hum...
Being simple and [...] majority
Hum right point...
But, still, if the only thing that matters, to have good review, is to pack up a comment page with words, i can say just anything, tell my life, or tell a series of insult to the amvmaker, and it wil still be estimated as smthg useful! do you think it's normal?!
In my opinion, lenght of review and and the fact that it's useful shouldn't be correlated at all...
I see indeed the fact that length is rewarded as the simplest way, for the commentor, to "get a good mark", or so....
-
A long review may not be great but [...] justification
Well, true.
But you're repeating yourself. I'd tell you the same thing as below: quality is not quantity; the two words have often been opposed in many fields...It's been even often told that things in poor quantity are things of good quality...I don't see why the two parameters would be confused in a-m-v.org...
i'd be inclined to say [...] description
Yeah, well..9_9...you may be right, maybe i belong to this minority...
if i'm among those you had in mind
Who?!... Me?! I had someone in mind?!...9_9? you're just learning it to me...!
creators rating is a horrible idea
Well, possible.
Indeed, i think creators shouldn't be the only one to rate the usefulness of a review; other visitors should also be allowed to do so (but that should b something very...consequent, "heavy" to settle...




