AMV's: Orthadox Editing Vs. Un-orthadox Editing

This forum is for the general discussion of Anime Music Videos.

AMV's: Orthadox Editing Vs. Un-orthadox Editing

Postby TwilightChrono » Fri May 15, 2009 11:58 pm

I started this topic because of a conversation in another thread, and I really got to thinking, what is everyone elses take on certain types of editing. Is there really such a thing as a proper way to edit and is there such a thing as a wrong way to edit?

I would really like to know everyone's opinion on this. And to stimulate this discussion I would like to quote a few phrases from that conversation. This thread is not meant to start a flame war. I would like to hear everyone's thoughts on editing in general. The below quotes are just meant to give you something to reference to. Feel free to provide examples of editing as well.


TwilightChrono Wrote:
Well, I don't know what to say. I'm just sick of getting all this advice from everyone, then when I finally use it, it's a "You can't do that" or a "It doesn't look right"

What happened to:

"Never switch from a high movement scene to a slow scene unless you can transition it well"?

Just curious because I tried my damndest to slow it down with smooth transitions to match the pace of the song and lyrics. I followed that advice to the "T" and here everyone says: "It looks weird" "You can't do that"

This is why I want to retire, because nothing I ever do, no amount of editing, or taking advice will ever make up for the fact that nothing I edit will apparently ever be good enough. Just seems like hypocrisy plays a big role here on the org. Apparently I'm losing because of the advice given here on the org. It's why I keep getting upset. Maybe I should just damn everyone else and do things my own way.


TwilightChrono Wrote:
Since when did AMV's become a thing for criticism. Most people just watch for pure enjoyment, while others watch so they can point out all the errors with it.

Basically, I'm saying that the org is taking a lot of the fun out of editing for me. Because nowadays you have to edit something just pure epic and awesome just to get any kind of praise on your video. Leaving newbies to editing somewhat in the dark, and it's not fair to them. All I've gotten recently is grief though.


Vivaldi Wrote:
You know, frankly I was thinking alot about that when I was rewatching some of you cascada beta's and some of your old stuff. You have a very unique style regarding hard cuts and external sync. It's not normal, but I always saw too much meticulous effort put toward it to say it's bad. I think your style really came into it's own with Memories Of Hate-Final Resolution. It had just the right mix of your style and conventional guidelines. At first I didn't like it because it didn't fit at all with my preconceived notions of how that song should be edited. But when I viewed it a week or so later with a more objective mindset, it was much, much better than I had remembered. That's when I realized that you weren't editing wrong, you were just editing your own way. I think from now you should just concentrate on perfecting your own style instead of bending over backwards to copy the "accepted" style of pretty much every other editor on the org.

This IC illustrates that perfectly. Hagaren's (no offense to Hagaren) was pretty, proper, and highly generic. But it did everything "right". Your's had mistakes, but I noticed every single cut you made. The editing felt more "vibrant" if you will. I wouldn't have been able to guess the exact tone of the video just from reading the description.

TL;DR
You've had your own style from day one, and I've seen it when it works. When other people try to correct you, they're trying to conform you to a generic style. Don't let them erase what makes your videos, yours. (I've been guilty of this in the past as well)

Also, damn near everyone else on the org is just as amature as you are. There's no big set of amv making rules everyone's keeping from you, so any advice they give you will 90% of the time be pulled straight from their ass. Take it into consideration, but don't let it guide you.


TwilightChrono Wrote:
I really don't think I should conform to traditional methods of editing. Cause then we all lose our sense of originality, and we can't really call our videos our own. I think that's the best way to some it up. What's wrong with having different styles? What's wrong with a little unorthadox editing here and there? Thank you Vivaldi. You really truly get it. Ahhh, man!! I feel so much better for some reason. I don't think I said what I wanted to say right though :sweat:

I think, when you watch an AMV, look at it from as Vivaldi said, an objective mindset. Think outside the perverbial editing box and try to feel what the editor wanted to do. I really don't think that there is a correct way to edit or an incorrect way, and I really think that sometimes, AMV editor's tend to forget that. I know I have on some occasions. Again, thanks Vivaldi.


Discuss.
Image
Premiering At Another Anime Con 2012
User avatar
TwilightChrono
 
Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Location: In Your Dreams.......Watching You Sleep

Re: AMV's: Orthadox Editing Vs. Un-orthadox Editing

Postby AaronAMV » Sat May 16, 2009 12:05 am

Unorthodox.
Image
User avatar
AaronAMV
eating that e. coli spinach
 
Joined: 22 Jan 2008
Location: (◔ ◡ ◔ )
Status: (◔ ◡ ◔ )

Re: AMV's: Orthadox Editing Vs. Un-orthadox Editing

Postby Vivaldi » Sat May 16, 2009 12:09 am

I believe there are proper, tried and true ways to edit. But no single way. The approach should depend on the intended viewer response. If you want to create an immersive, flowing video. All hard cuts, all the time to static scenes, most likely won't do. But it can create a transcendent awareness and acceptance of a more artificial flow. To say how a person should edit, you should see what they're trying to convay in the first place.

And compromises generally create the best videos of all.
Image
Image
<Kenzichu> HAHAHA!!
<Kenzichu> everyone died!
User avatar
Vivaldi
Polemic Apologist
 
Joined: 29 Sep 2007
Location: Petting mah cat..

Re: AMV's: Orthadox Editing Vs. Un-orthadox Editing

Postby LittleAtari » Sat May 16, 2009 12:39 am

"Don't Break the Rules, unless you know them"
User avatar
LittleAtari
 
Joined: 22 May 2005

Re: AMV's: Orthadox Editing Vs. Un-orthadox Editing

Postby LittleAtari » Sat May 16, 2009 12:48 am

Before someone says this, I will:
AMVs are made for fun. You can edit however the heck you want.

It's true, but if you're editing and planning to show it to an audience and want them to enjoy it, that goes out the window. I make AMVs for myself first and everyone else second. I can be 'orthodox' or 'unorthodox' for myself, but for a general audience, I can't. If I'm working with someone, I have to compromise and so do they to suit both of our tastes. Everyone else is second and is therefore factored into how I make an AMV. If I can tweak something to make it so more people will enjoy it, I will.
User avatar
LittleAtari
 
Joined: 22 May 2005

Re: AMV's: Orthadox Editing Vs. Un-orthadox Editing

Postby TwilightChrono » Sat May 16, 2009 1:12 am

I make AMV's for fun also. But I also believe that it is important to introduce the viewer to all different aspects of editing, not just a set way. If I don't think that my current editing style will suit the video, I change it so that maybe it might flow better. At most con's there is a wide range of editing styles in the contests and free shows, but most of them come from the same mold as that of here on the org. You don't see a lot of hard-cuts in editing, when I believe that hard cuts are also an important fundamental in editing.

There are some things you can do with hard-cuts that you can't do with just regular fading, flashing, masking, photoshoping or otherwise. They bring a kinda flavor and a in your face POW at times that the usual flare doesn't really do. Isn't being surprised in an AMV important too. Like a "Ooooo, I've never seen that done before"

Almost all AMV's nowadays contain masking or photoshopping, and make it very hard for people who don't know how to do that, to get anywhere in a Con AMV Contest or otherwise. As stated, you have to make something super epic and bad-ass to get anykind of good feedback from anyone here on the org. Well, something along those lines. Every video I have seen on the org is either critisized or flamed out of existence, which isn't the idea behind watching an AMV.

When was the last time you watched an AMV just to enjoy. And to not think in the back of your mind while watching that the video could use some work, here and here? When was the last time you watched an AMV with an empty mind? Or just because you were interested. Personally, I think a lot of people have lost sight of this.
Image
Premiering At Another Anime Con 2012
User avatar
TwilightChrono
 
Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Location: In Your Dreams.......Watching You Sleep

Re: AMV's: Orthadox Editing Vs. Un-orthadox Editing

Postby Qyot27 » Sat May 16, 2009 1:21 am

My focus and sense of flow is restricted primarily to what looks good to my eyes and awareness of rhythm. I'm sure I've probably done a transition from high-motion to low-motion before, but I'm not in the mood to go rewatch my videos and see how many times it's happened.

People do get accustomed to certain commonalities amongst the most popular videos around here, which makes others imitate it all the more. But the real difference lies not in the framework a video a constructed in, but how well someone can pull it off. This goes for both standard-fare editing and those that take a less stringent approach to it. It comes down more to scene selection, IMO, than how closely one can get to the popular templates.

I'm reminded of a conversation in one of the forums some years ago, in a discussion on 'Emo' (I refuse to acknowledge modern crap with that genre title, hence the quotes), and the one thing I remember is that a reason given why it gets annoying to some people is because the singing can be atonal. Don't ask me to try and really pick that assertion apart for accuracy, but it's somewhat relevant toward expectations of an audience. Obviously, for whatever reason - corporate or not - some people love it. Quite a lot of others despise it. But is it really a judgment call on how to do the music 'right' or not, or is it due to individual taste?






Wait...are we just talking about videos not using crossfade transitions or being suffocated by fancy effects and eye candy?
My profile on MyAnimeList | Quasistatic Regret: yeah, yeah, I finally got a blog
User avatar
Qyot27
Surreptitious fluffy bunny
 
Joined: 30 Aug 2002
Location: St. Pete, FL
Status: Creepin' between the bullfrogs

Re: AMV's: Orthadox Editing Vs. Un-orthadox Editing

Postby godix » Sat May 16, 2009 1:24 am

TwilightChrono wrote:Is there really such a thing as a proper way to edit and is there such a thing as a wrong way to edit?

Yes. To be honest though, it isn't worth discussing on the org. Those who don't already know why the answer is yes would never understand no matter how much it gets explained. So feel free to ignore them and believe it's all just personal taste. Or, alternatively, pick up a fucking art theory book sometime.
Image
User avatar
godix
a disturbed member
 
Joined: 03 Aug 2002

Re: AMV's: Orthadox Editing Vs. Un-orthadox Editing

Postby TwilightChrono » Sat May 16, 2009 1:28 am

Wait...are we just talking about videos not using crossfade transitions or being suffocated by fancy effects and eye candy?


We are talking about all editing in general. From each person's style, sense of editing, editing ability, what most people consider standard and non-standard or orthadox and un-orthadox editing, what people prefer all the way down to AR and the lowest common denominator.

Anything that you think relates to this topic.
Image
Premiering At Another Anime Con 2012
User avatar
TwilightChrono
 
Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Location: In Your Dreams.......Watching You Sleep

Re: AMV's: Orthadox Editing Vs. Un-orthadox Editing

Postby TwilightChrono » Sat May 16, 2009 1:32 am

TwilightChrono wrote:
Wait...are we just talking about videos not using crossfade transitions or being suffocated by fancy effects and eye candy?


We are talking about all editing in general. From each person's style, sense of editing, editing ability, what most people consider standard and non-standard or orthadox and un-orthadox editing, what people prefer all the way down to AR and the lowest common denominator.

Anything that you think relates to this topic.


SORRY FOR THE DOUBLE POST:

Pick up a fucking art theory book sometime.


Why should I follow a set of rules laid out by some guy so many some odd years ago? We get too caught up in expectations and in ways that things should be done, that we don't seek out newer ways to do things. And don't sit there and tell me that there isn't any because that's bull. It's called adventure. It's like a game of hide and seek. You look for something that works and can appeal to people. Or find something that you can make work in your own way. What about ignoring all those damn text books and doing something your own way for once, instead of adhearing to some rules or traditions or ways of doing things that were set by someone else. Become a pioneer yourself and find new ways to do things. THat's what I've been trying to say and do.
Image
Premiering At Another Anime Con 2012
User avatar
TwilightChrono
 
Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Location: In Your Dreams.......Watching You Sleep

Re: AMV's: Orthadox Editing Vs. Un-orthadox Editing

Postby godix » Sat May 16, 2009 1:52 am

TwilightChrono wrote:Why should I follow a set of rules laid out by some guy so many some odd years ago? We get too caught up in expectations and in ways that things should be done, that we don't seek out newer ways to do things. And don't sit there and tell me that there isn't any because that's bull. It's called adventure. It's like a game of hide and seek. You look for something that works and can appeal to people. Or find something that you can make work in your own way. What about ignoring all those damn text books and doing something your own way for once, instead of adhearing to some rules or traditions or ways of doing things that were set by someone else. Become a pioneer yourself and find new ways to do things. THat's what I've been trying to say and do.

Humans are hardwired to view certain things in a certain way. Complimentary colors clash. Movement in one direction followed by movement in the opposite direction is jarring. Blacks and dark colors give a sober mood while bright primary colors convey excitement or other similar emotions. For centuries, millennia really, artists have been studying how humans react to stuff and how to manipulate those reactions in artistic endeavors. You can seek out 'newer' ways of doing things, or you can read a fucking art theory book and find out what lessons thousands of years of experience and experiments have discovered.

I have to wonder, do you think scientists should ignore all previous theories on the atom and instead seek out 'newer ways to do things'? Should carpenters discard their tools and try to figure out this whole hammer/nail thing in a 'newer way'? Do writers discard english and make up their own language because it's 'newer'? In almost every field people use existing knowledge as a basis and try to advance from there. It's called cumulative knowledge and it's the reason we aren't sitting in caves with each person trying to rediscover fire. Except for AMVs, for some reason you seem to think learning lessons from previous artists is considered a bad thing in AMVs. Which is rather odd considering the entire point of this thread is for you to get the perspective and knowledge of other people about AMVs. If you REALLY want to learn from other people's experiences then you'd quit asking random uneducated idiots on the internet and pick up a god damned art theory book.
Image
User avatar
godix
a disturbed member
 
Joined: 03 Aug 2002

Re: AMV's: Orthadox Editing Vs. Un-orthadox Editing

Postby Douggie » Sat May 16, 2009 2:18 am

TwilightChrono wrote:Why should I follow a set of rules laid out by some guy so many some odd years ago? We get too caught up in expectations and in ways that things should be done, that we don't seek out newer ways to do things. And don't sit there and tell me that there isn't any because that's bull. It's called adventure. It's like a game of hide and seek. You look for something that works and can appeal to people. Or find something that you can make work in your own way. What about ignoring all those damn text books and doing something your own way for once, instead of adhearing to some rules or traditions or ways of doing things that were set by someone else. Become a pioneer yourself and find new ways to do things. THat's what I've been trying to say and do.

I really try to get to learn the foundations of editing, because believe it or not, once you know that, you can get to creating new things, things your way. It doesn't mean that you have to follow everything a book says, but reading about the philosophies of editing doesn't only give you a better grasp of how things work, but also gets you thinking about their and your ways and how to improve them - which is where your style starts.

I don't know if I'm a bad example in this, but I have read a bunch of books about editing and design and I don't think you can tell me or anybody else that I don't try new things in every video I do.
User avatar
Douggie
CHEESECAKE!
 
Joined: 19 Mar 2006

Re: AMV's: Orthadox Editing Vs. Un-orthadox Editing

Postby Pwolf » Sat May 16, 2009 2:22 am

As godix mentioned, yes, there is a proper way to edit. He has a really good point about fundamentals. You cannot make a good video without knowing the fundamentals of editing. On top of that, if you want to do motion graphics and other more intensive editing, you need to know about the fundamentals of color theory, animation (squash/strech, ease in/out, etc), and even music theory. What makes a video new and unique is how you take those fundamentals and turn it into something no one has seen before.

I typed out a big long thing for you but I'm going to condense this and hope this get across easier...

What is it you want to do? Do you want people to like your videos or do you want people to like videos that go against the fundamentals of editing?

If you want to try new things, then, to put it bluntly, quit your bitching. Do it the way you want to don't listen to what other people say. You will only get criticism. Deal with it. Einstein was laughed at for his ideas. He dealt with it.

If you want people to like your videos, don't try to reinvent the wheel. Listen to what people have to say but take it with a grain of salt. You don't have to do what someone tells you but good editors will take that advice and think about it the next time they come across the same issue.


Pwolf
ImageImage
ImageImage
Like the AMV .Org App? Think about donating to help me make it better.
User avatar
Pwolf
Friendly Neighborhood Pwaffle
 
Joined: 03 May 2001
Location: Some where in California, I forgot :\

Re: AMV's: Orthadox Editing Vs. Un-orthadox Editing

Postby LuluandAuron » Sat May 16, 2009 2:31 am

-A good edit is not noticed by the average viewer.
-Make the edit look like how the music sounds

Now whether either of those is orthodox or not doesn't really matter. In the business, I hear over and over that hiring most people out of school, is like hiring a robot. So I say, don't be a robot, do what looks good, and stay out of the mold :wink:
User avatar
LuluandAuron
 
Joined: 03 Apr 2004
Location: Canada

Re: AMV's: Orthadox Editing Vs. Un-orthadox Editing

Postby 8bit_samurai » Sat May 16, 2009 2:35 am

Pwolf wrote:As godix mentioned, yes, there is a proper way to edit. He has a really good point about fundamentals. You cannot make a good video without knowing the fundamentals of editing. On top of that, if you want to do motion graphics and other more intensive editing, you need to know about the fundamentals of color theory, animation (squash/strech, ease in/out, etc), and even music theory. What makes a video new and unique is how you take those fundamentals and turn it into something no one has seen before.

I typed out a big long thing for you but I'm going to condense this and hope this get across easier...

What is it you want to do? Do you want people to like your videos or do you want people to like videos that go against the fundamentals of editing?

If you want to try new things, then, to put it bluntly, quit your bitching. Do it the way you want to don't listen to what other people say. You will only get criticism. Deal with it. Einstein was laughed at for his ideas. He dealt with it.

If you want people to like your videos, don't try to reinvent the wheel. Listen to what people have to say but take it with a grain of salt. You don't have to do what someone tells you but good editors will take that advice and think about it the next time they come across the same issue.


Pwolf


x2

Also, In addition to getting an art theory book, there are numerous guides about editing techniques and such. I believe Scintilla had one, but I'm not sure it's relevant to the topic. I haven't read some of these myself (though one of these days I should), so I'm not sure how much is being repeated with different wording. There's also the possibility of "studying" AMVs and the feedback they receive (opinions made publicly for the viewing and the such) themselves, though I'm not sure how helpful that'll be.
Under Construction
User avatar
8bit_samurai
Hmm...
 
Joined: 17 May 2006
Location: Alaska

Next

Return to General AMV

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests