requiett wrote:you're attempting to classify a really subjective topic with only two variables... I'm shocked at all the long-ass responses to this thread. I thought you people were smarter than this.
staces wrote:I've seen some creators who have massive quantities of crap videos, and they've been making crap videos for years and will probably always make crap videos. But what gets me are the creators who have 5 or less videos, that they spent months making each one that are as equally crappy as the vids of the creators with lots. I mean, those "quality" over quantity people actually had to try to suck.
mikestrife wrote:anneke wrote:It also seems alot of people are thinking that quantity = crap.
I don't think Quantity is a bad thing. I look at some creators and see the massive amount of Quantity they have, and it's good quality over all.
Take two creators, one (Creator X) who has only 1 or 2 high quality videos, and another creator (Creator Y) who has 20+ videos that are all pretty good, but just not at the same 'quality' as Creator X.
I've been looking at it from the extremes. People who have actually specified I'm just going to put out as many videos as I can usually do have bad vids, but people who say I wanna put out the best video I can do have great videos.
For someone to have alot of good videos, I think that just means they've found a good balance between the two.
Beowulf wrote:There are notable exceptions however, such as WTF by Fluxmeister that was made in 2 days and is quite possibly the best video in history.
Knowname wrote:downwithpants wrote:it could be that the low quantity creators have these things called lives.
or at least pretend to....
Flint the Dwarf wrote:requiett wrote:you're attempting to classify a really subjective topic with only two variables... I'm shocked at all the long-ass responses to this thread. I thought you people were smarter than this.
And if you'd bother to read any of those long-ass responses, you'd see that people know this is a subjective topic with two variables, and each has opinions about it. The topic is as intelligent or unintelligent as the discussion dictates, and when people like you come in and shit all over the place, it's bound to be unintelligent. Intelligent conversation usually starts with a generalization, and then people pick it apart.
It's already been stated in this thread several times that "quality" can be different for different people.

Castor Troy wrote:Koopiskeva wrote:Qualintity |:
In chinese, they use the same word for Quality and Quantity.

Koopiskeva wrote:Castor Troy wrote:Koopiskeva wrote:Qualintity |:
In chinese, they use the same word for Quality and Quantity.
Does that mean that they don't care? Or care too much? Or is Osaka really mega man and Jesus is also the incredible hulk? |:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests