doughboy wrote:IcyCloud wrote:I'd certainly hope this isn't the case. In fact, I usually see quite the opposite. Save for perhaps contests and the like, this site's based more on community than competition
Tell that to the people who invite their friends to give all 10 reviews, and the people who specicifically target top 10% videos just to give them bad reviews/stars. The 2nd example being the most prominent. I'm not saying I give a crap, but it's still disgusting how competitive the members here can be.
And especially tell that to the "well respected" editors who do nothing but post to talk about themselves or their videos. They contribute nothing but self promotion and self importance.
Arigatomina wrote:Professional amv makers who consider this a dedicated way of life?
Keeper of Hellfire wrote:Arigatomina wrote:Professional amv makers who consider this a dedicated way of life?
:shock: Does that mean there are people making their living with making AMV's?
anneke wrote: Do people not realize that a Quality video should not try to fill in for a lack of Quantity?

Keeper of Hellfire wrote:An AMV which is too hard compressed or not perfect synched but can affect me I rate higher than one that is technical perfect but absolutly pointless.
Beowulf wrote:Quantity lasts, quality fades.
/devils advocate
Arcane Azmadi wrote:Actually, wouldn't it be more accurate to say "Quality is remembered, quantity is ignored"?
anneke wrote:It also seems alot of people are thinking that quantity = crap.
I don't think Quantity is a bad thing. I look at some creators and see the massive amount of Quantity they have, and it's good quality over all.
Take two creators, one (Creator X) who has only 1 or 2 high quality videos, and another creator (Creator Y) who has 20+ videos that are all pretty good, but just not at the same 'quality' as Creator X.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests