SnhKnives wrote:I always make mine 640x(insert 4:3 or 16:9 here)
either 640x360 or 640x480

Heroine of Time wrote:If the size of your amv is smaller...will the file be smaller as well?
Heroine of Time wrote:O EM GEE!!!
So many sizes to choose from...well here's a related question...
If the size of your amv is smaller...will the file be smaller as well? Cuz I really need it so WMM can stop freezing on me.
Kalium wrote:..., and 848 by 480 for 16:9.
Kai Stromler wrote:Heroine of Time wrote:O EM GEE!!!
So many sizes to choose from...well here's a related question...
If the size of your amv is smaller...will the file be smaller as well? Cuz I really need it so WMM can stop freezing on me.
There is a balance between screensize, filesize, and quality. Basically, you get two of three.
If you want a large screensize and good quality, the file is going to be frickin hyuuge.
If you want a large screensize but a small filesize, the video is going to look like crap.
If you want good quality in a small filesize, the screensize is going to be smaller.
Of course, with a smaller screensize than the source materials is going to be losing picture information, but there is this thing human brains do called closure that makes compression codecs work, and the same principle applies to downsized screens.
hth,
--K

Beowulf wrote:Who could possibly give a shit about how good your compression is. Once you reach a critical threshold (that 90% of the videos nowadays reach) the difference is negligable to both the eye and to the server.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests