BasharOfTheAges wrote:intent can be pretty well ascertained - especially when constrained to "trying to do something like Kit did" and "everything else."
You know things are bad when I'm on the positive side of the benchmark.
BasharOfTheAges wrote:intent can be pretty well ascertained - especially when constrained to "trying to do something like Kit did" and "everything else."
OtakuGray wrote:Sometimes anime can branch out to a younger audience and this is one of those times where you wish children would just go die.
Stirspeare wrote:<Stirspeare> Lopez: Vanquish my virginity and flood me with kit. ["Ladies..."]

Kitsuner wrote:BasharOfTheAges wrote:intent can be pretty well ascertained - especially when constrained to "trying to do something like Kit did" and "everything else."
You know things are bad when I'm on the positive side of the benchmark.

BasharOfTheAges wrote:JaddziaDax wrote:well I guess it depends on the Frankenstein then...
I'd say it depends on the intent. And, yes, before we go down that tangent, intent can be pretty well ascertained - especially when constrained to "trying to do something like Kit did" and "everything else." There's an inherent difference, and it's not in the technical details.

BasharOfTheAges wrote:Can the amateur philosophical BS. Imitation of style and technique is not the same thing as copying of end-result product. You did not innovate in a vacuum, you learned things from other people. Your technique and style is irreverent to the conversation - everyone is in the same boat as you. Your produced product, on the other hand, is the result of your work. It's quantifiable. Only you made it.
Note: I'm not making any proclamations about the seriousness of any of this (it really isn't). I'm just here to tear apart stupid analogies and comparisons.
BasharOfTheAges wrote: Your technique and style is irreverent to the conversation

JaddziaDax wrote:It would also depend on how noticeable you want to make it...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests