JudgeHolden wrote:Castor Troy ... /thread.
I'm actually considering running a panel at AX about what goes into winning amvs. Keep the responses going.
JudgeHolden wrote:Castor Troy ... /thread.
I think calling it "good AMVs" would be a better approach, because sometimes BAD AMVs can win contests, lol...(I could name examples from over the years, but that would be rude...)Castor Troy wrote:JudgeHolden wrote:Castor Troy ... /thread.![]()
![]()
I'm actually considering running a panel at AX about what goes into winning amvs. Keep the responses going.
after all good or bad is something defined by perception. thereare a lot of people going crazy with Justin Bieber amvs.l33tmeatwad wrote:I think calling it "good AMVs" would be a better approach, because sometimes BAD AMVs can win contests, lol...(I could name examples from over the years, but that would be rude...)Castor Troy wrote:JudgeHolden wrote:Castor Troy ... /thread.![]()
![]()
I'm actually considering running a panel at AX about what goes into winning amvs. Keep the responses going.
I'm referring to bad editing, as in sloppy, poorly done, and completely trashy looking videos (regardless of the video and audio sources).Ikore wrote:after all good or bad is something defined by perception.
and Im referring to people who will see those AMVs as "AWESOME" even when they're lame for us.l33tmeatwad wrote:I'm referring to bad editing, as in sloppy, poorly done, and completely trashy looking videos (regardless of the video and audio sources).Ikore wrote:after all good or bad is something defined by perception.
If there is no bad, there is no good, so it's a pointless argument then, why did you even respondIkore wrote:and Im referring to people who will see those AMVs as "AWESOME" even when they're lame for us.l33tmeatwad wrote:I'm referring to bad editing, as in sloppy, poorly done, and completely trashy looking videos (regardless of the video and audio sources).Ikore wrote:after all good or bad is something defined by perception.
Standards can be set and you can be really skillful, but personal preferences will define your approval over what you like, and that will be consired good; you may set your mind to tell you that sloppy amv are the worst of this world, or you can think than only narutoball 3d zshipwhateverbleachwillbenamed are good, what is good for me can be bad for other, It's like Oscars and Cannes.
I like to write.l33tmeatwad wrote:If there is no bad, there is no good, so it's a pointless argument then, why did you even respondIkore wrote:and Im referring to people who will see those AMVs as "AWESOME" even when they're lame for us.l33tmeatwad wrote:I'm referring to bad editing, as in sloppy, poorly done, and completely trashy looking videos (regardless of the video and audio sources).
Standards can be set and you can be really skillful, but personal preferences will define your approval over what you like, and that will be consired good; you may set your mind to tell you that sloppy amv are the worst of this world, or you can think than only narutoball 3d zshipwhateverbleachwillbenamed are good, what is good for me can be bad for other, It's like Oscars and Cannes.