SupaKaream wrote:We need a faster, more efficient Chat Room. I seen lot of editors don't like the irc chat room mainly becuase the communication is a dull and boring. Chat rooms attracts people to visit the org site more often.
Im doing some research on about it atm on how to help about the chatrooms so yeah lmao.
While I'm tempted to say "wait, who are you again?", I just gotta ask - what tells you that a "faster" chatroom would be better? I mean, while you might not share their perspective - #amv on IRC typically has 40-60 members logged in at any given time. Many of them have been on the IRC for years. If it were that boring, I don't think you'd have that consistent a membership. On that account, the IRC chat on the .org has been extremely successful. Building a steady, working chatroom is not an easy task. #amv, meanwhile, is almost constantly active and has a variety of discussion on it, ranging from utter imbecility to interesting and technical debate.
I'm frankly not sure what you mean by "boring", but if it doesn't suit your interests, I'm not sure what will.
And just as frankly, I have not seen you on #amv at all. Something tells me you have not actually really tried it - now, if you did try and at some point it was quiet or not particularly excited to have you there, well, that's something that happens too. I don't think it's fair to jump into a conversation and expect everyone to pay attention to you. Try to watch the discussion, jump in, and try to steer it by participating. I don't think #amv has ever been unresponsive to this. Be aware that you're in a community and are not entitled to being the center of attention by default. On the other hand if you offer up interesting input into discussion, I think that's where you can make it less boring for yourself. Don't expect a chatroom to entertain you without participating. That's not what chatrooms (or any other discussions) are for.