I think the top 10% vids should be sorted according to a true Bayesian estimate, like IMDb.com, i.e.
weighted rank (WR) = (v ÷ (v+m)) × R + (m ÷ (v+m)) × C
where:
R = average for the movie (mean) = (Rating)
v = number of votes for the movie = (votes)
m = minimum votes required to be listed in the top 10% (3)
C = the mean vote across the whole report (all vids)
It would give a more stable list, with newer vids having to work their way up (as they should) instead of appearing high in the list and then going down as more people add opinions.

