Nessephanie wrote:7+ being MEP's...sure there may be one video or so that falls through the cracks and ends up in the wrong place (which seems to happen in other categories anyways), but overall it would separate the categories quite well...
(again, assuming this could be coded...)
Essentially what I see are two different types of MEPs:
1. Lots of individual videos combined into a larger project based on an over-reaching motif (AMV Hell; VG4)
2. Project where the lines between "tracks" are blurred because they flow into each other or are entirely non-existant.
I think that if they would be seperated they would have to be seperated along these lines, and *not* by how many people are actually on the project, be it two or two-thousand.
Like AtomX was saying, cutting it along the lines of the number of participants is very crude and I believe would <i>not work</i>. Also, having to watch every video to decide what would qualify and what wouldn't isn't functional either, has has already been stated. And like Corran mentioned, it's not possible for us to have the system automatically do it . . . unless . . .
we create new genre boxes on the video page, that the head of the MEP can click to distinguish it, and would also let everyone search for those videos more easily (which would have a more valid reason than just providing wankery as a VCA category).
jasper-isis wrote:I don't see a problem with your proposal. TJ?
Sounds fine.