If for nothing more than how easy it is to resize. Rider4Z wrote:anneke wrote:Why do I have a feeling people are secretly pimping their creations?
-Anneke
you never can tell
Malificus wrote:tythril wrote:
That one wins. By a huge margin.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
How can you argue with that?
BasharOfTheAges wrote:Rider4Z wrote:anneke wrote:Why do I have a feeling people are secretly pimping their creations?
-Anneke
you never can tell
Well, when certain people don't post that often then suddenly post here it's kind of a tip off, right?
Moha wrote:That "emoticon" is the best? Oh, gimme a break! How do you even put that on a banner? I doubt that it's vector-based and therefore it looks crap when you enlarge it.
Moha wrote:That "emoticon" is the best? Oh, gimme a break! How do you even put that on a banner? I doubt that it's vector-based and therefore it looks crap when you enlarge it.
True, it's good for a favicon but no more!
Be more reasonable: the 2005 logo was perfectly fine. Simple but artistic and the color can be easily adjusted for any banner or background.
Personally I think that a vector-based, b&w logo is the best.
Btw, there's only 40 entries... don't you think it's too few?
Moha wrote:That "emoticon" is the best? Oh, gimme a break! How do you even put that on a banner? I doubt that it's vector-based and therefore it looks crap when you enlarge it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests