Top 10% List "Score" Modified

SnhKnives · Post by **SnhKnives** » Tue May 04, 2004 12:26 am

NOOOO NOW ITS HARDER TO BE GOOD!!

no, the new system is 10x more accruate than before....good job phade

angelx03 · Post by **angelx03** » Tue May 04, 2004 12:27 am

Phade wrote:Hey,

Zarxrax wrote:Phade: how about an option to remove all videos from the list that you have downloaded locally?
So let it be written; so let it be done.... sorta...

Phade.

Oooooo, pretty colors.

downwithpants · Post by **downwithpants** » Tue May 04, 2004 2:23 am

eww, pastel. where's your sense of color coordination?
j/p, nice job. still, makes me wanta... eat froot loops.

it was nice to see some new videos cycle through the top 10% though. but i guess we still have the top star scale for that.

WilLoW :--) · Post by **WilLoW :--)** » Tue May 04, 2004 3:07 am

Nice Work Phade, as it's already been said, The list seems more accurate than before. It's good to see some "classics" in this list

And apparently it also lowered the top10's average mark, which is also a Good thing I think.

Org Profile · Post by **Otohiko** » Tue May 04, 2004 10:07 am

Oh God! I just checked out that scale!

Awesome, awesome work. Now I really can't see how it could possibly be better. (well, maybe if it was longer considering I already have about 70% of the videos on it.)

In any case, congrats on the excellent work.

dwchang · Post by **dwchang** » Tue May 04, 2004 11:52 am

Otohiko wrote:Oh God! I just checked out that scale!

Awesome, awesome work. Now I really can't see how it could possibly be better. (well, maybe if it was longer considering I already have about 70% of the videos on it.)

In any case, congrats on the excellent work.

Perhaps a Site Suggestion is adding a filter like "Filter by %" and then you could specify the % you want (like 20 for example). It's not like the scores aren't already there (they're all calculated as such) and it'd just require making a larger table and filling it further.

Another solution (which is already there) is to filter by genre. I know it's not entirely what you want, but by doing that, the list does (to a degree) get longer since not all 171 vids are in there. That way, the vids of that genre that almost made it, now make it.

Bote · Post by **Bote** » Tue May 04, 2004 12:36 pm

WEWT! My video is there to 8) . It payed off dewing all those op. exchanges

.

Scintilla · Post by **Scintilla** » Tue May 04, 2004 1:58 pm

Okay, I see that green denotes a video I've DL'ed locally, but what do red and yellow mean?

Zarxrax · Post by **Zarxrax** » Tue May 04, 2004 2:31 pm

The key is at the bottom of the page.

mckeed · Post by **mckeed** » Tue May 04, 2004 5:13 pm

Ok, I don't understand how this works. I'm math challenged. I had a video that has a average of 9.58 with 16 reviews, and on the top 10% the average is 8.88 or something close to that. How does the average of the video change? I don't get it? Isn't the average the average? What good is the normal average score? I don't know anything about bayes law or why this would be any more accurate than the old way. Are the video averages being scaled? Or do the star ratings have effects on the average now? Ahhhh...my head hurts. Someone please explain, I must be missing something.