the Black Monarch wrote:Well, I WAS going to continue to trust the results of impartial professionals rather than those of an amateur who had a debate to win and whose results included some extremely anomalous-bordering-on-ridiculous data
but your airtight ad hominem attack has convinced me otherwise!
oh, good! that means we can stop arguing now yeah?
I must've missed the part with the alleged "ad hominem" attack...except for the end there. That last little bit was a bit attackish, but you set me up perfectly for that one.
This part of your post on the other hand...yeah, I can't find a part in it that wasn't a personal attack
the Black Monarch wrote:Anyway, the matter about XP supporting more than 2 cores was taken to NeuralClone over at Ex Isle. This is a guy who really, really knows his sh!t, and even he wasn't sure what the core limit was, but confirmed that XP Home was limited to 1 physical CPU, and XP Pro limited to 2.
Did you really need to bother someone else about that? It's right on the Microsoft site. (4th FAQ) Also...
Kariudo, ~2 weeks ago wrote:However, Home can only use 1 physical cpu while Pro can use 2 physical cpus (which is seen primarily on server mobos)