Which capture card to buy.....??

This forum is for help with and discussion about your video hardware.

Which capture card to buy.....??

Postby Bushido Philosopher » Sat Dec 21, 2002 10:40 pm

OK, I think I'll finally buy a video capture card. Problem is I have no idea which one to pick.

So I need a little help on decision factors like how reliable is it? or is it compatible with Premiere 6.5? or how good is the capture? etc etc.

I saw one of those Pinnacle cards and the thing was like as much as Premiere!! I don't think I'll wanna go THAT high in price, but if it's for good reason, then I might.

Thanks for the help.
"Many people want to change the world, but very few even consider changing themselves."
<<A>My Member Profile</a>> <<A>Read my Xanga</a>>
User avatar
Bushido Philosopher
 
Joined: 25 Jun 2001
Location: California

Postby madmallard » Wed Dec 25, 2002 8:38 pm

almost 300 posts and not capture carded? :wink:

believe it or not, whatever pinnacle card you were looking at was one of the cheaper ones.

as far as premier, if you're using a PC, then premier sees any capture device if it is a windows multimedia accesable capture device.

two choices, internal and external

Internal are pretty much capture cards.

External includes firewire vcrs, camcorders, converter boxes for firewire, and usb devices.
User avatar
madmallard
 
Joined: 04 Aug 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status: Cracked up quacker, quacked up cracker

Postby Bushido Philosopher » Thu Dec 26, 2002 4:12 pm

oh wow, im up to 300 already?

well damn, if that's one of Pinnacle's cheaper ones then I think I'd die if I saw the expensive ones.
"Many people want to change the world, but very few even consider changing themselves."
<<A>My Member Profile</a>> <<A>Read my Xanga</a>>
User avatar
Bushido Philosopher
 
Joined: 25 Jun 2001
Location: California

Re: Which capture card to buy.....??

Postby Knowname » Sat Jan 04, 2003 2:17 pm

Ko Oh Yoku wrote:OK, I think I'll finally buy a video capture card. Problem is I have no idea which one to pick.

So I need a little help on decision factors like how reliable is it? or is it compatible with Premiere 6.5? or how good is the capture? etc etc.

I saw one of those Pinnacle cards and the thing was like as much as Premiere!! I don't think I'll wanna go THAT high in price, but if it's for good reason, then I might.

Thanks for the help.


Idunno where you heard that was one of Pinnacles cheaper ones (maybe the post b4... don't bug me I gotta headache ;-p)

anyway pinnacle makes both analogue (ghetto) and DV cards if you mean this' a cheap DV card than that's beleivable... Analogue cards are sufficiant for stuff like gettin your stuff from vhs, laserdisc or some non-demanding archiving off tv my analogue card comes from Iomagic but it is made by Pinnacle (even still says Pinnacle on it), according to Dscaler it IS a Pinnacle card lol. Anyway it is only like $20... but if you wanna be anal about it (don't wanna rip from your DVD drive or just need awesome quality captures) than you get DV wich, as you found out, costs $300+.
User avatar
Knowname
 
Joined: 16 Nov 2002
Location: Sanity, USA (on the edge... very edge)
Status: Indubitably

Postby madmallard » Sat Jan 04, 2003 5:01 pm

people seem to forget. . .its not easy for a computer, even todays computers, to just push through the amount of data required to generate an NTSC broadcast signal.

mpeg2 has probably been one of the best overall quality vs space payoff solutions ever.

DV is not

MJPEG is not.

there was no way a computer from 10 years ago could've handled full video without a)compression, b)clustering or multithreading, c) daughterboard.
User avatar
madmallard
 
Joined: 04 Aug 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status: Cracked up quacker, quacked up cracker

Postby Knowname » Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:08 am

so your saying, good DV-type capture card would need a really good machine and/ or RAID or SCSI??
User avatar
Knowname
 
Joined: 16 Nov 2002
Location: Sanity, USA (on the edge... very edge)
Status: Indubitably

Postby Vlad G Pohnert » Sun Jan 05, 2003 6:33 am

sixstop wrote:people seem to forget. . .its not easy for a computer, even todays computers, to just push through the amount of data required to generate an NTSC broadcast signal.

mpeg2 has probably been one of the best overall quality vs space payoff solutions ever.

DV is not

MJPEG is not.


Yes, somewhat true but your statement is very misleading.

Mjpeg was used for Analog capture cards and can be compressed. Basically quality depended on compression, but it compressed below 3, then quality is outstanding (blows Mpeg2 away) but at the cost of space
lots op space.

DV is a 5:1 compression format. Yes it take up more space, but it can be edited in real time and not as lossless as Mpeg2. This is the format of choice for most video editing cards! Your statement I would say if not quite true...

Mpeg2. You can't edit it in it's native authored format. Must use a version such as Mpeg2-I (I frame) or something like the DC2000 uses (much larger files sizes). Yes, it's a great quality vs space for authoring (output) format, but not a good idea to keep your masters in. More for distribution on discs, etc.

Vlad
User avatar
Vlad G Pohnert
 
Joined: 02 Jan 2001
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Postby Vlad G Pohnert » Sun Jan 05, 2003 6:38 am

Knowname wrote:so your saying, good DV-type capture card would need a really good machine and/ or RAID or SCSI??


No true at all!

Todays computers and IDE drives have no problem at all editing in DV. Most cards are even dual stream (Pinnacle DV500, Matrox RT2500, etc) and that is no problem for a IDE ATA 100+ drive to keep up with.

Best is to get a computer system like a P4 with atleast 0.5 gig ram. Always use a sperate Hard Drive(s) for video capture/editing from your system drive and you'll be fine...

Vlad
User avatar
Vlad G Pohnert
 
Joined: 02 Jan 2001
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Postby VicBond007 » Sun Jan 05, 2003 11:33 pm

You want to sell your soul to Pinnacle. My dv500 is unquestionably the greatest investment I ever made.

There's nothing wrong with analog capturing Knowname. Do you know what every television studio in America still uses? Do you think everything is DV and firewire? I laugh at that openly. Analog, if done right, is godlike. Look at Laserdisc. It runs circles around DVD and it's craptacular compression. But enough about that...

The DV500 will capture to Dual stream DV. IIRC, it's got two little processing units on it, and each one handles a field. DV rendering is handled on the card so it's of little relevence what CPU you have, so long as it's fast enough to keep up with the massive amount of data (and tv-out requires a good 500MHz). The main bottleneck is HD speed, and even that is really a myth. Back in the day I ran a test capture of the 1-hour long "This is Otakudom" through my DV500, onto a UDMA66 5400RPM HD. The entire thing captured in full without skipping a beat (NTFS partition of course, otherwise it'd crash the moment it hit 4GB). And if you've got DV devices lying around the house you want to put to use, the DV500 has 2 firewire ports built right in, and comes with great software to control the device and pull the clips automatically.

A cheaper solution would be to go for the DC30, which is essentially the same card, except it works in mjpeg instead of dv2. Theoretically it's lossy, but it's completely unnoticeable. I do not know if it has firewire ports or not and am too lazy to look.
"With free bagels we can live like Kings!...Kings who have to pay for their own castle in order to get the free bagels!" - Omar Jenkins
User avatar
VicBond007
 
Joined: 27 Feb 2001
Location: New Jersey

Postby Vlad G Pohnert » Sun Jan 05, 2003 11:47 pm

No, The DC30 is all analog. I still have my DC50 which is the same card but with Component video as well. And yes I agree that there is nothing wrong with analog caputure. I dod quite a few videos with my DC50 and they actually turned out in terms of quality much better in some cases then what I do in DV.... Basically, If I used a 1:2.5 compression ration, the quality was compatible with Beta SP, the still King of broadcast....

Vlad
User avatar
Vlad G Pohnert
 
Joined: 02 Jan 2001
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Postby VicBond007 » Mon Jan 06, 2003 12:24 am

LONG LIVE BETA!!!
"With free bagels we can live like Kings!...Kings who have to pay for their own castle in order to get the free bagels!" - Omar Jenkins
User avatar
VicBond007
 
Joined: 27 Feb 2001
Location: New Jersey

Postby madmallard » Thu Jan 09, 2003 1:39 am

Vlad G Pohnert wrote:Yes, somewhat true but your statement is very misleading.

Mjpeg was used for Analog capture cards and can be compressed. Basically quality depended on compression, but it compressed below 3, then quality is outstanding (blows Mpeg2 away) but at the cost of space
lots op space.


oh yes, properly configured and with all settings on high, a dc10 can yield extremely spiffy results, even at 3-1 compression. But it is basic compared to other capture cpu's, and is slow, if 6m/sec could be called slow. . .;p

DV is a 5:1 compression format. Yes it take up more space, but it can be edited in real time and not as lossless as Mpeg2. This is the format of choice for most video editing cards! Your statement I would say if not quite true...


depends on whos codec. the last time i did water testing, Panasonics' hard codecs were the best, and sonys were among the worst, especially at solid colors. but i'm kinda out of the loop.

DV seems to run into issues with NTSC more than PAL i've heard on the international scene, at least where capturing.

Mpeg2. You can't edit it in it's native authored format. Must use a version such as Mpeg2-I (I frame) or something like the DC2000 uses (much larger files sizes). Yes, it's a great quality vs space for authoring (output) format, but not a good idea to keep your masters in. More for distribution on discs, etc.

Vlad


yeah, i wasnt trying to come across saying mpeg-2 was the shiznit overall. But it is an extremely significant advancement of quality / space handoff compare to the other two video compressions. . . .
User avatar
madmallard
 
Joined: 04 Aug 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status: Cracked up quacker, quacked up cracker

Postby IMAC » Wed Feb 05, 2003 8:29 am

I got a simple PCI card from Koutech (606-RSF I think) for basic analog input and it's been working great., haven't had any problems from Ulead or Premiere, but a professor at teh local college turned me onto somthing that looks pretty...awsome..

ADS Technology API-550 Pyro A/V Link.

retails around $250, all you need is a basic OHCI card to plug it into... lets you do full scale Analog and DV into it, export to analog or DV... and makes me drool just looking at the specs sheet..teh text is kinda fuzzy, but at the bottom is a photo of all the i/o ports on teh front and back..and it's OS X and Windows compatible... http://www.adstech.com/products/API_550/pdf/API550b.pdf

NEXT UP... me going broke over hardware..
IMAC
 
Joined: 03 Dec 2001

Postby The Wired Knight » Wed Feb 05, 2003 1:24 pm

I recomend a good Pinnacle DV capture card, specifically the DV500
BANG

Intellectual Property, Real Estate & Probate Attorney.
User avatar
The Wired Knight
 
Joined: 07 Jan 2001
Location: Right next door to you
Status: Attorney At Law


Return to Video Hardware Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest