Video capture/editing hardware

This forum is for help with and discussion about your video hardware.

Postby ErMaC » Fri Dec 12, 2003 5:12 pm

First up:

http://www.dc1000.org

is a website I used to visit for info about the DC1000 and DC2000 cards. You can still get a hold of one of those cards, and if you don't mind using Premiere 6.0 you'll get realtime MPEG2. Use Quu's guide on this site to convert ripped MPEG2 streams to streams readable in realtime by Premiere.
You might be able to find one of those cards pretty cheap on eBay or something since I think they're technically no longer supported, but I'd do some research into it first or ask Quu what he thinks.

Neither of the current Matrox RT products support MPEG2 for realtime editing. One allows capture of MPEG2, and both allow outputting in MPEG2, but neither one allows you to edit in MPEG2 natively.
I even checked their Digisuite series of products even though they're probably way out of any of our price ranges and a couple of them support realtime MPEG2 <i>I-Frame</i> editing, which means they capture all keyframes, so if you just took an IBP stream and dumped it on your drive it wouldn't work.
So unless Canopus has a product that'll do it, it looks like you have to go to Pinnacle's older products, since none of their current consumer products will do it.
User avatar
ErMaC
The Man who puts the "E" in READFAG
 
Joined: 24 Feb 2001
Location: Irvine, CA

Postby BogoSort » Sat Dec 13, 2003 1:32 am

That seems to be about what I gleamed from their respective web sites too. I guess the big push nowadays is DV this and DV that, since DV is the biggest video buzzword out there. Did I forget to mention about how many DV cards there are on the market?
User avatar
BogoSort
 
Joined: 14 Mar 2001
Location: Right behind you with a knife!

Postby TaranT » Sat Dec 13, 2003 3:58 am

Have you guys heard of the MPEG editors from Mediaware Solutions? Quu pointed me to these several months ago. I don't know what his experience is with this, and I haven't been motivated to check it out myself. The pro version of M2-Edit is expensive ($1500).

Here's the link:
http://www.mediaware.com.au/framesets/3m2editprop.html

The editing suite seems to be very limited. Maybe cuts and splices would be adequate for AMV purposes. The transcoder (M2-xcode CL) may be useful, too.
TaranT
 
Joined: 16 May 2001

Postby TaranT » Mon Dec 15, 2003 4:57 am

I went ahead and ordered the ADVC-100. With luck it'll be here before the Xmas break. The ability to cancel Macrovision was a deciding factor.

If it helps, I ordered from Newegg for $269 & free shipping. B&H was a bit cheaper, but they charge for shipping.
TaranT
 
Joined: 16 May 2001

Postby BogoSort » Mon Dec 15, 2003 1:52 pm

Sweet, you'll have to tell me how that works out. I think I'm leaning in that direction myself, since I don't think there's a video editing card out there that really meets my requirements, and that my money would be better spent on more HDs and faster processors.
User avatar
BogoSort
 
Joined: 14 Mar 2001
Location: Right behind you with a knife!

Postby TaranT » Tue Dec 16, 2003 3:00 am

Newegg's really on the ball: the thing shipped this morning. I should have it working this weekend barring interruptions from the holiday season...or LotR3. :)
TaranT
 
Joined: 16 May 2001

Postby Lonley Driver » Thu Dec 18, 2003 11:39 am

I have an ADVC 100 and DV Storm 2 at the moment. I've really got to say that I don't use them really at all for AMV editing.

The ADVC 100 is really just an anaolog<>digital converter, and I find it extremely useful for taking shows off my TIVO or VCR/LD but for AMVs it's easier to just rip the DVDs.

The DV Storm is nice and it comes with a good effects package where you can do certain things a lot easier and a lot better than you can with the Premiere effects package. However, a lot of the effects are similar to the effects already in Premiere, so in many cases you can achieve the same results in Premiere without the Storm. The main attraction to this card is that it does all its effects, and some of Premiere's in real time, so if you're on a tight deadline, you won't need to sit there forever to wait for things to render.

The DV Storm also comes with a hardware MPEG encoder which once again is quicker than software encoding, but you can produce the same, if not better quality with software encoding if you just want to wait longer.

Don't get me wrong, the DV Storm is a great card, but it's probably not going to help you make better AMVs. However, it might help you complete them faster and give you a FEW more effects/filters to play around with.

-David
User avatar
Lonley Driver
 
Joined: 10 Feb 2003

Postby Lonley Driver » Thu Dec 18, 2003 11:52 am

Just one quick note. I'm not sure why anyone would really WANT to edit in MPEG2. I can understand merging or cutting MPEG2, but actually editing with MPEG2 is not a good idea and will probably just leave you with a headache. Just my 2...

-David
User avatar
Lonley Driver
 
Joined: 10 Feb 2003

Postby TaranT » Thu Dec 18, 2003 1:20 pm

Lonley Driver wrote:Just one quick note. I'm not sure why anyone would really WANT to edit in MPEG2. I can understand merging or cutting MPEG2, but actually editing with MPEG2 is not a good idea and will probably just leave you with a headache. Just my 2...


I recall that Quu was looking at that M2-Edit software just for the purpose of removing or adding black space to the start and end points of the MPEG2 files that he receives as submissions. Some of us (like, uhh...yours truly :roll: ) don't follow the rules to the letter.

I brought it up as a possible dream solution: for cutting clips directly off the DVD (i.e. no ripping needed). Then transcoding those for use in a project. However, I think it's highly unlikely that this package can do that.

I suppose M2-Edit could be used to cut clips after ripping - it does claim to be frame accurate - but we already have no-cost solutions for that.
TaranT
 
Joined: 16 May 2001

Postby ErMaC » Thu Dec 18, 2003 1:48 pm

You wouldn't be "editing" in MPEG2 per se. Your preview codec is MPEG2, but when you render out the final output you'd do it in Huffyuv, so the only MPEG2 you're dealing with is the source.
The benefit of doing it that way is that you get Realtime response with MPEG2 files, so you can read, preview, scrub, etc all in realtime.
User avatar
ErMaC
The Man who puts the "E" in READFAG
 
Joined: 24 Feb 2001
Location: Irvine, CA

Postby klinky » Thu Dec 18, 2003 1:52 pm

How does this hardware handle IVTC? Can it do IVTC? How would one go about IVTC with a hardware card while maintaining quality?
User avatar
klinky
 
Joined: 23 Jul 2001
Location: Cookie College...

Postby BogoSort » Thu Dec 18, 2003 4:43 pm

Thanks for your input Lonely Driver, and everyone else. I definately agree that the cards themselves don't actually help one make better amvs. The key is that the cards save time during editing, and allow one to have a much better editing flow where their visions of the video flow into the computer with less muss and fuss.

I think my currently decision will be to acquire one of these ADVC100s, since I do actually have need to capture from an analog source, and just buy faster processors and hard drives when I decide that I want faster and better editing capibilities.
User avatar
BogoSort
 
Joined: 14 Mar 2001
Location: Right behind you with a knife!

Postby TaranT » Sat Dec 20, 2003 4:27 am

klinky wrote:How does this hardware handle IVTC? Can it do IVTC? How would one go about IVTC with a hardware card while maintaining quality?

If you're referring to the ADVC-100, I don't think it does IVTC. All it does is conversions - either direction - between 29.97 FPS NTSC and 29.97 FPS DV (or the equivalent PAL conversion). There might be an internal IVTC in the prcoess of converting, but it's not something we could access.

I can't say anything about the RT cards; never used one.
TaranT
 
Joined: 16 May 2001

Postby TaranT » Sun Dec 21, 2003 4:30 am

I got this ADVC-100 box working today and it's just like all the reviews have said: just plug it in and go. No software to load other than normal Windows drivers; all options are set by DIP switches on the bottom of the box. The construction quality is excellent and the connectors feel sturdy (although I can't speak to long-term durability).

You'll need an RCA-to-1/8 phono plug adaptor (y-cable) if you want to plug audio into the back rather than the front. Likewise, you'll need your own 6-to-6 1394 cable if you want to plug that into the back. The unit comes with a nice 6-to-4 cable, but the 4-pin jack is on the front. Using that might be awkward depending on your setup.

The quality of the captured video looked very good with deep, rich colors compared to just playing the source on another monitor. Take this comment lightly, though, since I'm not a video expert and these monitors are not calibrated. There is some crackling in the previewed audio that does not show up when the footage is actually captured. It's not really a problem, but it never happened when I captured from the camcorder.

I also tried sending output to a VCR using the print-to-tape feature of Vegas. No problems here, either.

The long-term test will come when I start capturing for my next project. The only issue that concerns me is a possible conflict between the Canopus DV codec embedded in the hardware and the proprietary codec that Vegas uses. Shouldn't be a problem, but there's been some discussion about it on another forum.
TaranT
 
Joined: 16 May 2001

Previous

Return to Video Hardware Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests