Rewrite the guides...

This forum is for video and audio help and discussion.

Rewrite the guides...

Postby OmniStrata » Mon Dec 23, 2002 1:05 pm

Um, I have NO problem with the guides, whatsoever...

However, I've been recieving emails. Not one, but a few concerning that the guides are too confusing...

If it's ok with the original authors

[A & E]

I'd like to do my own version of the guides using theirs as a source of information.

"2JA's AMV Export Quick Guide for Dummies..."
Just like the book series of sorts...
Perhaps I'll change "Dummies" to "Newbies" later...
"Strength lies in action. Let the weak react to me..." - Kamahl, Pit Fighter from Magic: the Gathering
"That is a mistake many of my enemies make. They think before they act. I act before I think!" - Vortigern from Merlin ('98)
"I AM REBORN!" - Dark Schneider Bastard!! OAV
User avatar
OmniStrata
 
Joined: 01 Aug 2001
Location: Chicago
Status: Wealthy

Postby RadicalEd0 » Mon Dec 23, 2002 1:49 pm

Maybe if they cant understand the guides they shouldnt be dabbling in digital video :\
cuz it gets a lot more complicated than that
NMEAMV: PENIS
NMEAMV: IN
NMEAMV: YO
NMEAMV: MIXED
NMEAMV: DRINK
User avatar
RadicalEd0
 
Joined: 24 Jun 2002

Postby AbsoluteDestiny » Mon Dec 23, 2002 2:52 pm

If there's anything I've learned when writing the guides, it's that there is no simple way to write them whilst still being thorough.

Feel free to take the information you have learned from the guides and put them in a more simple manner, but there are only two ways of doing this, as I see it:

1) Simplify them by sticking just to the basic things you have to do and not using much technical terminology

2) Make them longer by doing everything step-by-step with lots of pictures.

Both of these methods have problems.

1) If you do number 1 people don't learn anything - they merely "do" without knowing why. It's also very easy to make presumptions about what people want to do. Sure you can tell someone how to do one thing very simply but there are choices that are governed by what a person is using. The A&E guides are designed with this in mind and, in theory, should cover most possibilities. This, of course, doesn't make it short.

By removing these elements you can make something that is more simple to understand but one that doesn't imform people correctly about what things mean and why you sould be doing something. We could have easily written the guides just telling people what to do but there's no point in just spoonfeeding "Thou shalt inverse telecine" - if people dont know what it is doing then how are they supposed to handle results?

2) You can do method 2, but man it's painful. There are far fewer images, for example, in the current guide partly because the best software to use changes by the month. Text is easy to update - images aren't.

As for the general idea, it's fine... and I have no objection to any such project.. but I'm personally against dumbing things down. I'd much prefer someone to take time to understand what the guides mean than to just follow some "Video production by numbers" guide where they follow instructions but don't know why they are dong anything.

In my experience that just leads to people doing things wrong and not knowing why. The guides are detailed in order to avoid people making mistakes by not knowing enough about what they are doing - that is why they are so detailed. Personally I don't think there is a simpler way of describing something if you want people to know everything that the guide tells them.

The glossary was one step towards helping people with some of the more complicated technical terms., and I know that if anyone found any section to be overly vague then it could be rewritten. If people have found something hard to understand then I would prefer to rewrite it.

If it's just that they aren't taking the time to read through them properly, then there's nothing I can do. There are very clear instructions on how to do things, but there is also a lot of description as to why you should do something (and why you should not do other things). I'm sorry if that's too confusing but there's no other good way, in my opinion.

If you want to make a quick and easy way, then do so but I'd much rather people learn what it's all about than just following something step by step.
User avatar
AbsoluteDestiny
 
Joined: 15 Aug 2001
Location: Oxford, UK

Postby ErMaC » Mon Dec 23, 2002 5:49 pm

The people who find the guides "too confusing" are generally the people who don't read them properly. They go in, expecting there to be a simple answer to their problem that they can just go DO. It's never that simple.

The guides were designed to be read through entirely. If you just skim them and look at this and that, of course you will not understand them!.

If someone comes up and asks me to play golf, I could say "You use the club to hit the ball in the hole." Now, that probably won't be very useful to those who are trying to play golf having never played before, cause they'll do it all wrong!

So when someone comes up and asks me how to encode a video for online distro, I can just say "You just encode it with XviD." Again, that will not be very useful either. Someone looking for a one-sentence explanation will be sorely disappointed - the field of video processing is just not that simple.

I really do not approve of rewriting the guides to be "dumbed down" because that's essentially what it would amount to - telling people to do "this and this and this" and be done with it is not helping them in the long run, because then the next WEEK when the technology changes (and if you're keeping up with XviD alphas and AVIsynth filters, that's what it's doing) they'll be stranded.

The trick is to teach the theory, because theory is almost always applicable. If people understand how video works and how the filtering and compression work, or at least understand their purpose (they don't have to know what an Unsharp mask is to understand MSharpen makes pictures sharper) then when new filters come out or the filtering technology changes they won't be dead in the water.

Omni, if you wanna rewrite the guides, do it while still keeping all the information in tact. Once you do that, then I might say "OK, that's a good idea, we can include it in the guide."

But if you're gonna write the GodianKnot equivalent of AMV encoding, I don't want anything to do with it.
User avatar
ErMaC
The Man who puts the "E" in READFAG
 
Joined: 24 Feb 2001
Location: Irvine, CA

Postby Luke Valentine » Mon Dec 23, 2002 6:05 pm

ErMaC is right. N00bies can't expect to be coddled. There isn't a simple answer to these problems. Take me for example: I'm just started to learn to edit subtitles out. So I came here, expecting it to be incredibly difficult. But thanks to the guides, I'm breezing through subtitle removing using the "Repeat Frame" and "Photoshop Edit" methods, and I understand the guides just fine. n00bs can't expect people to hold their hands through this process. But, if you've read their guides and you're still have problems, try reading mine:

Image
Image
This is my signature. Don't like it? Blow me.
9 out of 10 AMV Creators agree! I'd make a kick-ass Mad-Hatter.
Suggest "Luke Valentine Says Blow Me" becomes it's own section! Moderated by yours truly! Put it right under "It's all about me" That way, I'll only be allowed to post there! A post anywhere else would get me banned! A suggestion for Luke is a suggestion towards a Luke-free Forum.
User avatar
Luke Valentine
 
Joined: 04 Nov 2002

Postby Luke Valentine » Mon Dec 23, 2002 6:07 pm

Dear lord, my grammar was terrible during that post haha. Sorry, I'm using photoshop to remove subtitles even as I type this, so I'm not really paying attention to my grammar or spelling. haha.
Image
This is my signature. Don't like it? Blow me.
9 out of 10 AMV Creators agree! I'd make a kick-ass Mad-Hatter.
Suggest "Luke Valentine Says Blow Me" becomes it's own section! Moderated by yours truly! Put it right under "It's all about me" That way, I'll only be allowed to post there! A post anywhere else would get me banned! A suggestion for Luke is a suggestion towards a Luke-free Forum.
User avatar
Luke Valentine
 
Joined: 04 Nov 2002

Postby RadicalEd0 » Mon Dec 23, 2002 7:43 pm

ErMaC wrote:if you're gonna write the GodianKnot equivalent of AMV encoding, I don't want anything to do with it.


but gordianknot is a program
and er... not like I was planning on .. aw snap >.>
NMEAMV: PENIS
NMEAMV: IN
NMEAMV: YO
NMEAMV: MIXED
NMEAMV: DRINK
User avatar
RadicalEd0
 
Joined: 24 Jun 2002

Postby Ashton » Mon Dec 23, 2002 8:22 pm

ErMaC wrote:The trick is to teach the theory, because theory is almost always applicable. If people understand how video works and how the filtering and compression work, or at least understand their purpose (they don't have to know what an Unsharp mask is to understand MSharpen makes pictures sharper) then when new filters come out or the filtering technology changes they won't be dead in the water.


Yeah, I actually have a lot of fun reading about video theory, thats why Ive become so interested in Doom9 of late. Im also getting to the point where I think it would be cool if you and absolute destiny would discuss the theory in more detail, more about the inner workings of the programs (especially AVIsynth and XviD, I spent all of last night trying to figure out what quantizer, and quantizer matrix are exactly, for example. I didnt succeed :( ) Anyway, the stuff of Doom9 is fun and all, but the way the guides on the org are especially written to the interest of an AMV creator keeps them more on the applicable side (IE I really have very little interest in reading about dividing a movie between two CDs, but a lot of the time thats the kind of guide where the info I want can be found) Anyway, the point is that I wholeheartedly agree with what you said, and I salute the two of you and your guides in all of their cruel and difficult ways! :twisted:
Image
The anime Channel Petition Sign it if you like anime.
My member profile on the org.
オタク同士やろう! Ashton
User avatar
Ashton
 
Joined: 23 Jul 2001
Location: Northern California

Postby NME » Mon Dec 23, 2002 8:41 pm

No matter how good a guide is, there'll always be someone too stupid to understand it.
nil per os
NME
 
Joined: 13 Jul 2001
Location: Far Country
Status: nauseating bliss

Postby You choose Sam,the rest » Mon Dec 23, 2002 10:11 pm

NME wrote:No matter how good a guide is, there'll always be someone too stupid to understand it.


That would be me
You choose Sam,the rest
 
Joined: 10 Aug 2001

Postby AbsoluteDestiny » Tue Dec 24, 2002 3:38 am

Ashton wrote: I spent all of last night trying to figure out what quantizer, and quantizer matrix are exactly, for example.


I actually did a very long post on the old forum explaining what quantizers and quantizer matrices are - it's not that easy to work out ^_^

If Phade can did up the post again, it would be cool... it took me ages to write.
User avatar
AbsoluteDestiny
 
Joined: 15 Aug 2001
Location: Oxford, UK

Postby OmniStrata » Tue Dec 24, 2002 9:59 am

Point taken, in that case, I'm NOT doing it...

If they can't read / utilize the guides, I guess they're not trying...

Me personally, I read the instructions on HOW TO USE THE PROGRAMS listed, not all the other technical stuff and I turned out fine...

[Just ask the NES Project peeps... ^_^]

LONG LIVE THE GOOD ENCODE! ^_^
"Strength lies in action. Let the weak react to me..." - Kamahl, Pit Fighter from Magic: the Gathering
"That is a mistake many of my enemies make. They think before they act. I act before I think!" - Vortigern from Merlin ('98)
"I AM REBORN!" - Dark Schneider Bastard!! OAV
User avatar
OmniStrata
 
Joined: 01 Aug 2001
Location: Chicago
Status: Wealthy

Postby AbsoluteDestiny » Tue Dec 24, 2002 10:59 am

I am really glad that more and more people are learning from these guides - it makes me proud to go to these forums and see people asking questions about techniques they would never had dreamed of using before - and even better... people answering them because they have read the guides.

It's very cool :)

I think most people who have worked it out for themselves are willing to give those finding it hard to understand a few pointers (and that is really great) but I think the guides are as detailed as they have to be for people to learn... and they are, does that rule or what :D
User avatar
AbsoluteDestiny
 
Joined: 15 Aug 2001
Location: Oxford, UK

Postby Luke Valentine » Tue Dec 24, 2002 4:18 pm

No one commented on my hilarious image :cry:
Image
This is my signature. Don't like it? Blow me.
9 out of 10 AMV Creators agree! I'd make a kick-ass Mad-Hatter.
Suggest "Luke Valentine Says Blow Me" becomes it's own section! Moderated by yours truly! Put it right under "It's all about me" That way, I'll only be allowed to post there! A post anywhere else would get me banned! A suggestion for Luke is a suggestion towards a Luke-free Forum.
User avatar
Luke Valentine
 
Joined: 04 Nov 2002

Postby EarthCurrent » Tue Dec 24, 2002 5:08 pm

Luke Valentine wrote:No one commented on my hilarious image :cry:

I wonder why...???
User avatar
EarthCurrent
 
Joined: 12 Feb 2002

Next

Return to Video & Audio Help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest