What do you use DivX for? Be Nice Please

This forum is for video and audio help and discussion.

What do you use DivX for? Be Nice Please

Postby The_Digital_Phoenix » Wed Jul 03, 2002 12:51 pm

Okay, I know I already have a few of you laughing or shouting "what a f***ing noob!" but I want to know. I thought that it was an encoder of some kind. I don't know what it does except it will play video files for me that no other player will. So if that's all, then cool, but if it does more, great.

-The Digital Phoenix
User avatar
The_Digital_Phoenix
 
Joined: 07 Jan 2002
Location: Lost in my own head

Postby nailz » Wed Jul 03, 2002 6:14 pm

Divx is used for compression. It makes files look pretty good in smaller packages. For example, you take a 10 gig huffyuv file and run it through divx to compress it, it may only come out to (for example) 30 megs.
Ploink! Magic Cupcake! <a href="http://www.elvenking.net">Elvenking</a>. I'm sorry, I can't hear you over how awesome I am.
User avatar
nailz
 
Joined: 04 Jun 2001
Location: Phoenix AZ

Postby RadicalEd0 » Wed Jul 03, 2002 10:55 pm

<bites his (her? o.o) head off> no just kidding. Don't worry, you can post stupid questions here, this isnt doom9. Don't post stupid questions there.. people will yell at you. But here everyone can act like a fool freely because.. this isnt doom9. So don't worry. But anyway...
DivX isnt a player, its a compression format, just like mpeg 1, but its usually used to compress avis. It's actually just a hacked version of microsoft's third mpeg-4 codec, which sucked anyway, and thus DivX 3.11 alone still pretty much sucks. Actually, there were two DivX codecs, a high motion, and a low motion, but both sucked. But see this guy realized that you could play around with DivX's quantizers and crap and combine the fast and low motion codecs and thus SBC was born and so was Nandub. Nandub let you tweak DivX until it looked decent, in fact until it looked good. So good that you could encode half hour anime episodes at a size of 100 megabytes with good quality. Eventually DivX 3.11, the hacked version, was abandoned and an openDivX project (project mayo) was started. The aim of this project was to build a completely legal variant of DivX 3.11 using original source (and not that of M$). Some different codecs spun off of this, 3ivx, XviD (will come back to) uh.. something, i dunno, mostly crap. And DivX 4, which was released by DivX Networks. It kinda sucked, but it was a start. A lil while later they released DivX 5 which was a lot better and about as good as DivX 3.11 with SBC. In the mean time XviD was beating the crap out of DivX 4 and the other openDivX codecs, and now DivX 5 and XviD are about evenly matched. Jeezus that was boring to write, but there, now you have the entire history of DivX, yeesh.
NMEAMV: PENIS
NMEAMV: IN
NMEAMV: YO
NMEAMV: MIXED
NMEAMV: DRINK
User avatar
RadicalEd0
 
Joined: 24 Jun 2002

Postby The_Digital_Phoenix » Thu Jul 04, 2002 9:19 am

Thanks man. That was like all I ever wanted to know. Good of you to give it all at once like that. Oh, and I'm a guy.
User avatar
The_Digital_Phoenix
 
Joined: 07 Jan 2002
Location: Lost in my own head

Postby rafi.ikari » Mon Jul 08, 2002 6:27 am

So RadicalEd0, what your're saying is that I should use Divx 5 to compress with, not 3.11 or 4. I tought many was using 3.11 to do their divx amv's.
rafi.ikari
 
Joined: 23 May 2002

Postby JCD » Mon Jul 08, 2002 6:33 am

rafi.ikari wrote:So RadicalEd0, what your're saying is that I should use Divx 5 to compress with, not 3.11 or 4. I tought many was using 3.11 to do their divx amv's.

not the standard 3.11. use divx 3 sbc (nandub), that's pretty good (-> ermacs guide), but divx5 is as good as 3 sbc, when not it's better.
User avatar
JCD
Lord of the Dance
 
Joined: 21 Jan 2002
Location: New Zealand

Postby jbone » Mon Jul 08, 2002 1:12 pm

RadicalEd0 wrote:<bites his (her? o.o) head off> no just kidding. Don't worry, you can post stupid questions here, this isnt doom9. Don't post stupid questions there.. people will yell at you. But here everyone can act like a fool freely because.. this isnt doom9. So don't worry. But anyway...
DivX isnt a player, its a compression format, just like mpeg 1, but its usually used to compress avis. It's actually just a hacked version of microsoft's third mpeg-4 codec, which sucked anyway, and thus DivX 3.11 alone still pretty much sucks. Actually, there were two DivX codecs, a high motion, and a low motion, but both sucked. But see this guy realized that you could play around with DivX's quantizers and crap and combine the fast and low motion codecs and thus SBC was born and so was Nandub. Nandub let you tweak DivX until it looked decent, in fact until it looked good. So good that you could encode half hour anime episodes at a size of 100 megabytes with good quality. Eventually DivX 3.11, the hacked version, was abandoned and an openDivX project (project mayo) was started. The aim of this project was to build a completely legal variant of DivX 3.11 using original source (and not that of M$). Some different codecs spun off of this, 3ivx, XviD (will come back to) uh.. something, i dunno, mostly crap. And DivX 4, which was released by DivX Networks. It kinda sucked, but it was a start. A lil while later they released DivX 5 which was a lot better and about as good as DivX 3.11 with SBC. In the mean time XviD was beating the crap out of DivX 4 and the other openDivX codecs, and now DivX 5 and XviD are about evenly matched. Jeezus that was boring to write, but there, now you have the entire history of DivX, yeesh.


I'll attempt to give some better information than the person above. :-P

DivX 3.11a offers very good image quality for its size. It is, quite simply, a hacked MS MP4v3 codec which allows more compression options than MS MP4v3.

MS MP4v3 is a derivative of MPEG-4. It is not a true MPEG-4 codec - Microsoft only implemented a small chunk of the features in the ISO specification. (Enough to give good compression, but not enough that they'd have to pay royalties for their encoders, I'd imagine...)

DivX 3.11a is two codecs - "Fast Motion" and "Low Motion." The Low Motion codec offers superior quality over the Fast Motion codec, but the Low Motion codec doesn't always handle fast motion sequences well at a low bitrate.

To solve the problem, DivX 3.11a SBC basically uses both the Fast Motion and Low Motion codecs in the same file. 2-pass variable bitrate encoding is used to ensure that the video is allotted more data where it needs it (sequences with a lot of movement) and less data where it doesn't (still pictures, black screens, etc.).

DivX 3.11a SBC is, to my knowledge, the best implementation of DivX 3.11a.

However, a small but growing company wanted to capitalize on DivX's growing popularity. One problem - it's a hacked codec. DivX 4 was created legitimately, so that legitimate stuff could be done with it. However, it still had flaws, and it still wasn't a true MPEG-4 implementation.

DivX 5 Professional is a complete and (theoretically) stable implementation of MPEG-4. The free DivX 5 is also MPEG-4, but it has some features removed and wouldn't allow for the same quality as the Professional version.

A few open-source MPEG-4 projects exist, but the one standout MPEG-4 codec is XviD. (Yes, it's DivX spelled backward.) Many people agree that XviD offers superior quality over DivX 5, and the fact that XviD is free doesn't hurt, either. :-) However, XviD is still in the Alpha stage of software development - meaning it works, but it doesn't yet have 100% of its features implemented. Fortunately, even the early version out now is true ISO compliant MPEG-4, meaning you can make "mp4" video files with it and an MPEG-4 decider will understand it.

As XviD further develops and is completed, there's a good chance it'll dwarf DivX 5. Fortunately, as both follow the MPEG-4 standard, they each should be able to play back the other's content (if the content is properly made).

<I>No version of any of these codecs sucks.</I> Some are better than others, yes. DivX 4 is basically considered useless these days, and DivX 5 might not be all it's cracked up to be, but DivX 3.11a was excellent at the time it came out, and there are worse things you could use than DivX 5.
User avatar
jbone
 
Joined: 12 Jan 2002
Location: DC, USA
Status: Single. (Lllladies.)

Postby RadicalEd0 » Fri Jul 12, 2002 8:10 pm

I'll attempt to give some better information than the person above.


hey.. person? Who said I was one of those icky things. And yea, Microsoft's MPEG-4 codec did suck, have you ever encoded anything with it? even MPEG 1 was far better. Yah, it sucked alright. And the funny thing is, DivX 3.11 = msmpeg 4 version 3, it was simply hacked so that it could be used outside of the closed asf/wmv format. But yah, you're explanation was almost as good as mine, good job
/me pats you on the head ^.^

mm, oh yea i almost forgot. Yes, use XviD or DivX 5, sbc requires a lot of tweaking and knowledge of nandub to look good, whereas the above need no (divx 5) or much less (Xvid) tweaking. Xvid's only disadvantage to DivX 5 is the non use of b-frames (look it up _ _) although support was introduced in the latest prereleases so i hear o.o anyway even without b-frames XviD's quality is = or better than DivX 5 and I just did some tests and it seems the quality is = or at least similar to real 9 after all which is scary o.o
NMEAMV: PENIS
NMEAMV: IN
NMEAMV: YO
NMEAMV: MIXED
NMEAMV: DRINK
User avatar
RadicalEd0
 
Joined: 24 Jun 2002

Postby jbone » Mon Jul 15, 2002 3:40 pm

RadicalEd0 wrote:Xvid's only disadvantage to DivX 5 is the non use of b-frames (look it up _ _)


Hence "alpha software release." :-D
User avatar
jbone
 
Joined: 12 Jan 2002
Location: DC, USA
Status: Single. (Lllladies.)

Re: What do you use DivX for? Be Nice Please

Postby Rebus_Valstay » Mon Jul 15, 2002 4:09 pm

The_Digital_Phoenix wrote:What do you use DivX for? Be Nice Please
I put it on a CD-R disc and use it as a beer coaster. :P
[GLaU] Rebus Valstay
-----
Dammit! Where'd I put my cancer sticks?
User avatar
Rebus_Valstay
 
Joined: 02 Apr 2001
Location: Cartersville, GA

Postby post-it » Fri Jul 19, 2002 6:15 am

Divx² - Divx 5 - Xvid - Divx 4 - Alpha3.11 - Mpeg - avi & mov

in that order are the best Video Compression CODEC's currently in use.

the best is Divx² but it is only used for commercail encodes,
and the worst file compression is avi & mov "alone!" wwith no compression

Q: what is Divx ?

A: the idea had been around for a long time but never implamented:
if you take moving pictures and place them one-by-one, you have an
avi-or-mov(ie). Mpg was designed to remove the "common parts",
the parts of the picture that normally do not change in a video, and
only update the eyes & mouth movements; it failed, however - it was
not a total loss in the design of why it worked, just in its concept!
Divx is the best of Full Motion Video and Mpeg combined together.

viv - rm - wmf - asf & fm are Over-Kill-Extreames of Video compression.
these Videos are small but almost un-watch-able.

mpg - avi & mov are very clean and clear but HUGE hard-drive hog's!

Divx is a Video Format that is setting the standards for Internet sharing:
1) it is very well tested.
2) people like us, who use Divx, are very informed of "how it works."
3) it is very easy to use.
4) it can be returned into its original form ( un-compressed video )

Divx IS one of the most useful ways of sending and recieving home made
video's to friends and kewlest way to to share ideas that I know of :)
User avatar
post-it
 
Joined: 17 Jul 2002
Status: Audio: bass remains; if else, 3D

Postby jbone » Fri Jul 19, 2002 9:57 am

WTF is DivX-squared?

You seem to be a bit confused about some things, post-it... XviD is better than DivX 5 in many aspects, and its development is not yet finished so it stands to only get better. AVI is a sort of container for video; DivX files are AVIs. Thus sticking "AVI" at the end of your little "ranking" makes no sense. (Similar with MOV.)

MPEG-1 succeeded at doing what the MPEG-4 based DivX codecs do; it is just an older implementation.

DivX *cannot* be returned into "uncompressed video" - I mean, yeah, you can convert it back into an uncompressed AVI, but you won't get back any of the lost video data.
User avatar
jbone
 
Joined: 12 Jan 2002
Location: DC, USA
Status: Single. (Lllladies.)

Postby RadicalEd0 » Fri Jul 19, 2002 8:08 pm

The best video codecs out there are
RealVideo 9, XviD, DivX 5, and DivX 3.11

in no particular order, because all 4 are very very similar when used properly. I prefer Real 9 and XviD

the best audio codecs out there:
RealAudio 8, Vorbis, and AAC in order from best to worst

real audio 64 kbps ~ vorbis 96 kbps ~ aac 128 kbps
sorry Real haters, but the above is true, I've done a lot of tests.

There are several formats/containers to use the above in, I personally use
XviD and Vorbis in an ogg media file (.ogm or .ogg)
XviD and AAC in an mpeg 4 file (.mp4)
and obviously RealAudio and Video in a RealMedia file (.rm/.rmvb/.smil)
NMEAMV: PENIS
NMEAMV: IN
NMEAMV: YO
NMEAMV: MIXED
NMEAMV: DRINK
User avatar
RadicalEd0
 
Joined: 24 Jun 2002

Postby JCD » Sun Oct 13, 2002 7:09 am

it depends always on your source which compression will look good. Mostly this will be XviD, DivX 5 or Real9, but there are exceptions: I've made a video which has almost all over the time fast picture changes etc. (the 30 seconds of very fast pictures in eoe, endless is the name of the vid if anyone cares). I've tried all this codecs to get the 4-minute video under 50 MB with a good result, but every avi-compression and rm had results like hell, no matter what I tried. then I tried mpeg1 and it worked just fine. lower resolution, some visible quarter pixels, but looked just fine.

try out every kind of compression, sometimes the good old mpeg1 will suprise you
and: xvid is actually only good for high quality versions, lower ones will suck.
User avatar
JCD
Lord of the Dance
 
Joined: 21 Jan 2002
Location: New Zealand

Postby klinky » Sun Oct 13, 2002 7:27 am

JCD is out of the loop :shock:


Jul 19th , OCt 13th :?
User avatar
klinky
 
Joined: 23 Jul 2001
Location: Cookie College...

Next

Return to Video & Audio Help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests