the Black Monarch wrote:Dude... turning 30 frames per second into 60 half-frames per second is NOT compression. Nothing is being compressed. Nothing is smaller after interlacing than before. The same amount of data is being used to describe the picture.
koronoru wrote:In a really real interlaced television signal, field 2 is not the second half of the same picture you saw in field 1; it is the second half of a picture that comes 1/60th of a second after the picture you saw half of in field 1. The pictures change with every field, and you only get to see half of each one.
the Black Monarch wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
TV cameras shoot at 60 frames per second?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I find that hard to swallow...
Tab. wrote:whatever x 240.
the Black Monarch wrote:Yeah, but It's better than going through YV12 (DVD) -> YUV (Huffy) -> RGB (Premiere) -> YUV (huffy) -> RGB (Vdub) -> YUV (distro) bullshit. That's what I mean by avoiding SOME conversions.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests