Using Flash for Video Compression

This forum is for video and audio help and discussion.

Using Flash for Video Compression

Postby shadow-the-hedgehog » Sun Apr 13, 2003 3:39 pm

Yes! The web's favorite program can be used for video compression! I used muh "AMV" that I did for one class. I got it from about a little over six megs to a little over 1 meg. Granted the quality is a little shotty but considering thats about 1/6th of the original file and at 50% compression. The best part is you really don't have to worry to much about codecs and you can easilly add play, stop, Rew, FF buttons to the vids. As well as links to your site and email address.
**K.O.G3 MIX**
My Online Journal
'Unopened Letter to the World' by the Ataris wrote:Am I destined only to die the same way I lived, in seclusion?
User avatar
shadow-the-hedgehog
 
Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: [Insert Funny Location Here]

Postby trythil » Sun Apr 13, 2003 5:43 pm

Flash is pretty much worthless for doing any kind of high-quality animation unless it's vector-based, so you'd have to do one of two things:

(1) trace each frame (at a respectably tight threshold)
(2) shape tween between frames where possible (which would be WAY more time than it's worth)

Oh yeah, there's the whole "Flash Player is slower than most modern video players" deal.

Additionally, in absolute terms, a 6:1 compression ratio also isn't all that much of a difference, especially considering how much detail you lose.
DivX5 already gets somewhere on the order of 54:1. That's what "always" came out to, anyway: 2.6 gigabytes down to 49.5 megabytes -- and the encode retains a surprising amount of sharpness.

By loading all 5,059 frames into Flash and exporting the animation, I'd be making the thing look like hell, run slow as hell, or both of the above, and I'd not have a much smaller file for the trouble.

The best part is you really don't have to worry to much about codecs and you can easilly add play, stop, Rew, FF buttons to the vids. As well as links to your site and email address.


Who cares? MPEG-1 can be played on any platform, and MPEG-2/4 nearly any platform. I can't think of a media player that DOESN'T have seek functionality, and you can advertise yourself all you want in a good old bumper.
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 512 character limit.
trythil
is
 
Joined: 23 Jul 2002
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch

Postby the Black Monarch » Sun Apr 13, 2003 9:24 pm

Yeah, but Flash is good for comedy videos because it looks funny.

*shuts up*
The only .org member to donate $1,500 and still have a donation status of "total leech"
User avatar
the Black Monarch
 
Joined: 09 Jul 2002
Location: The Stellar Converter on Meklon IV

Postby shadow-the-hedgehog » Sun Apr 13, 2003 11:55 pm

No! Your missing the point. You Import your movie to flash...the finished movie. It is kinda like "post production." I am not saying do the WHOLE movie in flash.
**K.O.G3 MIX**
My Online Journal
'Unopened Letter to the World' by the Ataris wrote:Am I destined only to die the same way I lived, in seclusion?
User avatar
shadow-the-hedgehog
 
Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: [Insert Funny Location Here]

Postby trythil » Mon Apr 14, 2003 12:08 am

shadow-the-hedgehog wrote:No! Your missing the point. You Import your movie to flash...the finished movie. It is kinda like "post production." I am not saying do the WHOLE movie in flash.


That's precisely what I'm arguing is a bad idea. Read my post again.

If you did the whole thing in Flash, then it wouldn't be a bad idea to export in Flash.
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 512 character limit.
trythil
is
 
Joined: 23 Jul 2002
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch

Postby Nightowl » Mon Apr 14, 2003 3:56 am

shadow-the-hedgehog wrote:It is kinda like "post production."


Funniest thing I've read all week.

-N
User avatar
Nightowl
 
Joined: 29 May 2001

Postby klinky » Mon Apr 14, 2003 5:26 am

shadow-the-hedgehog wrote:No! Your missing the point. You Import your movie to flash...the finished movie. It is kinda like "post production." I am not saying do the WHOLE movie in flash.




Flash = Mathmatically Scalable Vector graphics that are animated.
Normal AMV = Pixels setup on a fixed bitmapped grid.

The two are incompatible.

If you embed into Flash, you must compress your bitmap video to codec. Which is stupid since you can do this w/o flash. Or have flash try to convert it to vectors(if that's possible).

So this is a BAD IDEA. It would not work since digital video and digital vector animation are two VERY different things.
User avatar
klinky
 
Joined: 23 Jul 2001
Location: Cookie College...

Postby shadow-the-hedgehog » Mon Apr 14, 2003 10:34 pm

But ot works damn you! Hold on...lemme upload the test I did.
**K.O.G3 MIX**
My Online Journal
'Unopened Letter to the World' by the Ataris wrote:Am I destined only to die the same way I lived, in seclusion?
User avatar
shadow-the-hedgehog
 
Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: [Insert Funny Location Here]

Postby Zarxrax » Mon Apr 14, 2003 10:55 pm

I have tried converting videos to flash before. They come out MUCH larger and look MUCH worse than the equivalent xvid or rm.
User avatar
Zarxrax
 
Joined: 01 Apr 2001
Location: Concord, NC

Postby shadow-the-hedgehog » Tue Apr 15, 2003 12:40 am

on the test I ran the file was considerably smaller than the original file. And the only reason it looks bad is b/c I put it at 50% compression.
**K.O.G3 MIX**
My Online Journal
'Unopened Letter to the World' by the Ataris wrote:Am I destined only to die the same way I lived, in seclusion?
User avatar
shadow-the-hedgehog
 
Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: [Insert Funny Location Here]

Postby trythil » Tue Apr 15, 2003 1:07 am

shadow-the-hedgehog wrote:on the test I ran the file was considerably smaller than the original file. And the only reason it looks bad is b/c I put it at 50% compression.


So take the original source file (like, if you have an uncompressed source, use IT), generate an XviD and a Flash file, and ensure that they look pretty much the same. (This is made easier if you examine selected frames under high zoom.) Then tell us the parameters you used for both processes. Provide screenshots so we can see exactly what's going on.

You're making an outrageous claim here, and as such, we demand hard evidence for the claim. If you can't provide it, you might as well have not said anything.

Chances are that the XviD will be smaller AND will play back at a more guaranteed frame rate across ALL platforms that XviD runs on (which includes Mac OS X, Linux/FreeBSD/many other free UNIX-like operating systems, Windows...)

In fact, I'd wager that that would be the case, because I've done several experiments with raster compression in Flash myself. (The short conclusion: The results sucked, in comparison to what I'd get from a system DESIGNED for raster compression -- you know, like XviD, DivX, MPEG-1/2, etc.)
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 512 character limit.
trythil
is
 
Joined: 23 Jul 2002
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch

Postby shadow-the-hedgehog » Tue Apr 15, 2003 2:49 pm

Bah... whatever... But it is still better for DLin' huge files. YOU could also stream it and the like.
**K.O.G3 MIX**
My Online Journal
'Unopened Letter to the World' by the Ataris wrote:Am I destined only to die the same way I lived, in seclusion?
User avatar
shadow-the-hedgehog
 
Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: [Insert Funny Location Here]

Postby Zarxrax » Tue Apr 15, 2003 3:03 pm

:|
You just don't get it do you?
User avatar
Zarxrax
 
Joined: 01 Apr 2001
Location: Concord, NC

Postby Synthangel » Tue Apr 15, 2003 3:13 pm

You can stream RM too...at a hell of a lot better quality/compression. I agree with Zarxrax...you really DONT get it do you?
There's a fine line between genius insanity...and I've crossed it 67 times.
User avatar
Synthangel
 
Joined: 07 Oct 2002
Location: Lancaster, PA

Postby trythil » Tue Apr 15, 2003 3:40 pm

shadow-the-hedgehog wrote:Bah... whatever... But it is still better for DLin' huge files. YOU could also stream it and the like.


So? I can stream MPEG, too, at far higher quality. Or RealMedia, Windows Media, or one of the streamable Quicktime codecs.

When streaming, the file size is irrelavent. Rather, it depends on how many bits you can throw at your client per unit time. Considering that I can get higher quality raster compression per bit with a system designed to do compression of such data, I think I'll be smart and use that system.

If you can prove that Flash -- a vector-based animation system -- will compress raster data better than, say, DivX 5.0.3 or the latest XviD, that'd be cool. But you've not done that.
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 512 character limit.
trythil
is
 
Joined: 23 Jul 2002
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch

Next

Return to Video & Audio Help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest