Tool, Prog or Metal?

This forum is for the general discussion of Music.

Tool, Prog or Metal?

Postby Propyro » Sat Sep 06, 2003 6:52 pm

Ok i was just thinking, i was in a cd store a while ago, and i saw tool sitting in the hard/metalsection, and i started thinking of what metal meant to me. My typical definition if metal goes somewhere along the lines of a loud wall of guitar that drowns out everything but the singer and the double bass drums. Tool is not one of those groups, i strated thinking if prehaps they fit more into the progressive genres and i think they do, but my deffinition of prog is somewhat vauge ... as far as i know prog is generaly "weird", yet good music with people who actualy know how to use their instruments.

Just wondering what you guys think. and yes, i know my deffinition of metal is some what vauge as well, but it suffices for m, and is not neccesarily a bad thing.

/|\
User avatar
Propyro
 
Joined: 11 Mar 2003
Location: Ontario

Postby kthulhu » Sat Sep 06, 2003 7:14 pm

Metal seriously varies. There's the unintelligible heaviness of death metal, the dark gothic tones of black metal, and the fast wailing and high speed of heavy and thrash metal - and that list doesn't cover all the various types of metal.

That said, I'd consider Tool to be progressive hard rock.
I'm out...
User avatar
kthulhu
 
Joined: 30 May 2002
Location: At the pony stable, brushing the pretty ponies

Postby Propyro » Sat Sep 06, 2003 7:26 pm

kthulhu wrote:Metal seriously varies. There's the unintelligible heaviness of death metal, the dark gothic tones of black metal, and the fast wailing and high speed of heavy and thrash metal - and that list doesn't cover all the various types of metal.

That said, I'd consider Tool to be progressive hard rock.


yes i know metal varies a lot, but i'm going by the generic blanket deffinition ... which is quite poor mind you ... but it sort of works ... ok fuck it, i;m generalizing and that never works.

but i agree with your classifacation of Tool ... i didn't feel like making up a new genre name since theres already enough of them.

/|\
User avatar
Propyro
 
Joined: 11 Mar 2003
Location: Ontario

Postby Otohiko » Sun Sep 07, 2003 10:17 am

I call tool prog-metal.

I haven't heard too much of it yet, but this is my understanding.
Prog-metal isn't really a genre so much as a classification for the odd ones out. If it sounds metal enough, yet too bizzare or complex to go into the classical metal genres, it goes into the prog-metal heap.

So, it's prog-metal in the same sense that the current King Crimson is prog-metal, while in reality the music of both is in genres of their own.

Sorry, had to stick my favorite band in the example again... :roll:
Otohiko
 
Joined: 05 May 2003

Postby nailz » Mon Sep 08, 2003 11:27 pm

There are definitely ways to classify prog metal... the most difinitive characteristic for it is "bad". heh. Either way, Tool is definitely NOT metal. I wouldn't really even consider them Progressive anything. I guess if you wanted to stretch it, it could be a mix of Progressive-Nu-Metal, even though, they don't really fit into the Nu-Metal catagory.

But calling them Prog Metal would be completely wrong. Prog Power goer's would shed blood of countless people if Tool was invited, which they wouldn't be, cause they're not prog.
Ploink! Magic Cupcake! <a href="http://www.elvenking.net">Elvenking</a>. I'm sorry, I can't hear you over how awesome I am.
User avatar
nailz
 
Joined: 04 Jun 2001
Location: Phoenix AZ

Postby Otohiko » Tue Sep 09, 2003 10:59 am

mm???

Then why was King Crimson successfully sharing stage with Tool?

If there's a single band that is truly both Prog AND Metal, that's KC.

Like I said, prog is not a genre of music nor any classification other than "the odd ones out, with complex influences". There is no definition that describes prog. There's no real identifying characteristics (although things like classical/world music influences combined with complex meters and unusual scales are generally a clue), and BAD is not a characteristic.

However, knowing your attitude to what you consider 'prog', I'll humbly step out again... believe what you want.

PS. Tool is vaguely either prog or metal, but it is still a bit of both, so you could still validly consider it Prog-metal...
Otohiko
 
Joined: 05 May 2003

Postby nailz » Tue Sep 09, 2003 3:38 pm

Tool is not metal. I think if you claim them to be metal on any real metal board, you're going to get laughed at by everyone and flamed by more than half the people.

King Crimson is definitely prog, but definitely NOT metal. I don't know where you're pulling this shit out from, but maybe you need to really redefine your definiton of metal.

I think you'd probably get your ass kicked at a real metal show.
Ploink! Magic Cupcake! <a href="http://www.elvenking.net">Elvenking</a>. I'm sorry, I can't hear you over how awesome I am.
User avatar
nailz
 
Joined: 04 Jun 2001
Location: Phoenix AZ

Postby kthulhu » Tue Sep 09, 2003 4:49 pm

Hey hey hey, put the dicks away. This is a discussion, not a measuring contest.

That said, has anyone considered my definition of them as progressive hard rock?
I'm out...
User avatar
kthulhu
 
Joined: 30 May 2002
Location: At the pony stable, brushing the pretty ponies

Postby Dirk_Temporo » Tue Sep 09, 2003 7:46 pm

Tool is definitely in the "other" category. Along with Cake.
Dirk_Temporo
 
Joined: 23 Aug 2003

Postby Otohiko » Tue Sep 09, 2003 7:55 pm

Hard rock - I don't like the definition. I think it's a little to broad and devoid of actual stylistic attributes. I guess that's because I'm one of the people who actually believes that rock is just a foil that you can stick anything to.

King Crimson is definitely prog, but definitely NOT metal.


Well, this is a tricky thing. KC is prog rock, but it's also prog-jazz-rock, prog-pop-rock AND prog-metal, just at different times. Try things like Red, Dinosaur, or new stuff like Level 5 or Facts of Life and then tell me it's not metal :wink: The current group clearly calls themselves 'nuovo metal'

But hmm, anyways, what are we measuring again? Amount of my King Crimson plugs or degree of dislike Nailz has towards progmetal? :wink:

Forget it. I just seem to get defensive when prog comes under some sort of questioning or attack. After all, my favorite band is the world's first (and best :roll: ) prog-rock and -metal band. Although I don't have an incredible amount of interest in other prog per se, it just seems to tickle me whenever the word isn't used they way I'd like it to be.
Otohiko
 
Joined: 05 May 2003

Postby Nestorath69 » Wed Sep 10, 2003 6:19 pm

I've been a die-hard Tool fan since I saw the debut of their video 'Sober' on MTV. I was 13-14 yrs old, then.
I've seen 'em in concert 5 times, and was impressed through and through... I've never tried to catogorize them, though. Why even try? Why subject yourself to the stigma of labeling something?
Site whoring:
http://forums.megatokyo.com - for anime, manga, RPG, Real Life, Politics, science, Spam, Video games, Music, et cetera.
www.deltaanime.com - I'm a Mod, baby!
User avatar
Nestorath69
 
Joined: 11 Jul 2002
Location: Utah right now. SLC region. I'll fight you. Come on!

Postby fonque » Mon Sep 15, 2003 2:58 pm

genre classifications suck all together. no group worth listening to really fits into just one.

and you say progressive metal i think of groups like dream theater and liquid tension tool is far from that
haro haro haro
fonque
 
Joined: 11 Aug 2003

Postby Rozard » Wed Sep 17, 2003 11:57 pm

fonque wrote:genre classifications suck all together. no group worth listening to really fits into just one.

x2 :up:
Image
RichLather: We are guests of this forum, and as such we do not make the rules.
BishounenStalker The freedom to suck is what makes the Internet rock.
User avatar
Rozard
 
Joined: 31 Oct 2001
Location: West Palm Beach, FL

Postby milatchi » Sat Sep 20, 2003 12:43 pm

Almost every music store I go to has TOOL placed in the Metal section. Many websites I refer to for music details have TOOL listed as "Alternative Metal" or "Heavy Metal". Although I can definitely see how they could be considered Progressive; noting many artsy elements their lyrics and music.

Who ever said "Nu Metal" is way off. If you have ever listened to TOOL then you realize they are not just another "Heavy Metal Clone Band" headed by guys with ears piereced to hell and a steel stud's shot through their tongue's screaming about how they were made fun of in high school and how they want to "cut their lives into pieces" because its "their last resort"
Profile
Website
"Waffle King, it's cheaper than the Huddle House and cleaner than the Huddle Whore."--milatchi
User avatar
milatchi
 
Joined: 14 Dec 2002
Location: a dream within a dream?

Postby kthulhu » Sat Sep 20, 2003 3:36 pm

Damn it, I'm taking a stand.

TOOL IS PROGRESSIVE HARD ROCK.
I'm out...
User avatar
kthulhu
 
Joined: 30 May 2002
Location: At the pony stable, brushing the pretty ponies

Next

Return to Music Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest