Anyone heard this song?

This forum is for the general discussion of Music.

Anyone heard this song?

Postby CaTaClYsM » Fri Apr 04, 2003 2:48 pm

Allman Brothers - Little Martha
So in other words, one part of the community is waging war on another part of the community because they take their community seriously enough to want to do so. Then they tell the powerless side to get over the loss cause it's just an online community. I'm glad people make so much sense." -- Tab
User avatar
CaTaClYsM
 
Joined: 26 Jul 2002

Postby Farlo » Fri Apr 04, 2003 6:16 pm

nope...only allman bros. i know is whipping post
User avatar
Farlo
 
Joined: 02 Apr 2002
Location: Fort Smith, Arkansas
Status: old timer amver

Postby CaTaClYsM » Fri Apr 04, 2003 7:09 pm

I think I should create a thread where I rate peoples playlists on a 1 to 10 scale based on the all around content of the playlist. Too many people listening to children of the bodom, not enough listening to Gordon Lightfoot, Mason Williams, and the Allman brothers.
So in other words, one part of the community is waging war on another part of the community because they take their community seriously enough to want to do so. Then they tell the powerless side to get over the loss cause it's just an online community. I'm glad people make so much sense." -- Tab
User avatar
CaTaClYsM
 
Joined: 26 Jul 2002

Postby kthulhu » Fri Apr 04, 2003 8:18 pm

Good luck on that. I have over 2000 tracks. I bet most other people do too. You can either pointlessly go over every single track on each playlist and waste your time, or declare a bunch of 70s mellow music to be better than most of the shit on peoples' playlists and tick off a ton of people.
I'm out...
User avatar
kthulhu
 
Joined: 30 May 2002
Location: At the pony stable, brushing the pretty ponies

Postby CaTaClYsM » Fri Apr 04, 2003 9:29 pm

and I find it strange for someone to have 2000 tracks of stuff like children of the bodom, and have never even heard of the Allman brothers is beyond me. And what is even funnier is how I can safely say that of those 2000 songs not one of them is a Buddy Holy song, or a Rolling Stones song, and I'm 70% sure that you don't have any beatles in there either.
So in other words, one part of the community is waging war on another part of the community because they take their community seriously enough to want to do so. Then they tell the powerless side to get over the loss cause it's just an online community. I'm glad people make so much sense." -- Tab
User avatar
CaTaClYsM
 
Joined: 26 Jul 2002

Postby SarahtheBoring » Fri Apr 04, 2003 10:21 pm

Errr, that'd be because the average person on this site is, like, 14 and likes nothing but Linkin Park. *twitches*

I don't know that song in particular; my Allman Brothers knowledge stops right after "Jessica". I'm not huge on classic rock - I just listen to the radio for it usually, a song here and a song there.

And, yeah, [insert standard bitching about the lack of musical diversity on the .org]. Not that there's no diversity at all, but that doing something different is definitely the exception to the LP/POD/whoever rule.
User avatar
SarahtheBoring
 
Joined: 07 Apr 2002
Location: PA, USA

Postby kthulhu » Fri Apr 04, 2003 10:37 pm

CaTaClYsM wrote:and I find it strange for someone to have 2000 tracks of stuff like children of the bodom, and have never even heard of the Allman brothers is beyond me. And what is even funnier is how I can safely say that of those 2000 songs not one of them is a Buddy Holy song, or a Rolling Stones song, and I'm 70% sure that you don't have any beatles in there either.


And I'm willing to bet you have no Two-Mix, Sentenced, Catch 22, or OOMPH! in yours.

I've heard of the Allman Brothers. I've just never been tempted to hear them. Klinky has some Buddy Holly, and I DO, as a matter of fact, have some Beatles.

So take your "my listening to 70s fogey rock makes me holier than thou" attitude and shove it. It impresses no one, not even the people who listened to it back in the day. I have pretty damn diverse musical taste, if I do say so myself.

You seem pretty enamored with the 70s/80s. Why don't you go back there?
I'm out...
User avatar
kthulhu
 
Joined: 30 May 2002
Location: At the pony stable, brushing the pretty ponies

Postby CaTaClYsM » Fri Apr 04, 2003 11:44 pm

First off, buddy holly was 50's, beatles is 60's Along with Gordon Lightfoot and Mason Williams. If your going to bash my taste in musiv at least get the DECADE correct. And no, as a matter of fact I don't have Two-Mix, Sentance, Catch 22 or OOMPH! on my playlist. But then again, I don't try to listen to every brand new garage band or every band of one specific genre. And there is nothing wrong with not listening to them since they arent that famous, (relatively speaking). So why don't you take your "I think I know what the hell I'm talking about" attitude and shove it.
So in other words, one part of the community is waging war on another part of the community because they take their community seriously enough to want to do so. Then they tell the powerless side to get over the loss cause it's just an online community. I'm glad people make so much sense." -- Tab
User avatar
CaTaClYsM
 
Joined: 26 Jul 2002

Postby CaTaClYsM » Fri Apr 04, 2003 11:46 pm

SarahtheBoring wrote:Errr, that'd be because the average person on this site is, like, 14 and likes nothing but Linkin Park. *twitches*

I don't know that song in particular; my Allman Brothers knowledge stops right after "Jessica".


Another good Allman brothers song
So in other words, one part of the community is waging war on another part of the community because they take their community seriously enough to want to do so. Then they tell the powerless side to get over the loss cause it's just an online community. I'm glad people make so much sense." -- Tab
User avatar
CaTaClYsM
 
Joined: 26 Jul 2002

Postby SarahtheBoring » Fri Apr 04, 2003 11:58 pm

indeed, albeit six hours long. ;)

IMO, claiming moral superiority over anyone because of any musical taste is kind of lame. But everyone and his dog does the exact same thing, so complaining every time somebody pulls an attitude over it would leave me with laryngitis and/or serious carpal tunnel.

IMO again, variety is good, not just having type of music X or type of music Y in your collection. If only because variety is good in darned near any aspect of life. But "variety" != "having music X or music Y in your playlist." If someone had hysterical J-pop and mindfuck British techno in their collection, I'd consider that a form of variety. As would having hippie-rock and Black Sabbath. Even if I happen to not like any of them. There's no one so dreary as a person who only listens to one band or one genre, ANY one genre, and that's the bottom line.

...and I am obviously lacking lots of sleep, so I'm done. 8)
User avatar
SarahtheBoring
 
Joined: 07 Apr 2002
Location: PA, USA

Postby CaTaClYsM » Sat Apr 05, 2003 12:00 am

Did I ever claim moral superiorety? no, I was just wondering how in the hell none of the people (who I can't even begin to count) who frequent this board have heard of it.
So in other words, one part of the community is waging war on another part of the community because they take their community seriously enough to want to do so. Then they tell the powerless side to get over the loss cause it's just an online community. I'm glad people make so much sense." -- Tab
User avatar
CaTaClYsM
 
Joined: 26 Jul 2002

Postby kthulhu » Sat Apr 05, 2003 12:52 am

Well, I have heard of the Allman Brothers. Like I said, I haven't had any real desire to hear them.

Certainly, though, I'm sure they have more talent than at least 90% of the mainstream and much of the less known stuff out nowadays.
I'm out...
User avatar
kthulhu
 
Joined: 30 May 2002
Location: At the pony stable, brushing the pretty ponies

Postby CaTaClYsM » Sat Apr 05, 2003 2:02 am

Oh, and if anyone has any doubt about the diversity of my taste in music, they can go and find my playlist thread from a few months back. 25 songs of which 7 have never been heard by any other user than me. That's over a third of the songs.
So in other words, one part of the community is waging war on another part of the community because they take their community seriously enough to want to do so. Then they tell the powerless side to get over the loss cause it's just an online community. I'm glad people make so much sense." -- Tab
User avatar
CaTaClYsM
 
Joined: 26 Jul 2002

Postby Cardinal.jpg » Sat Apr 05, 2003 8:50 pm

Just because people haven't heard of it doesn't make it diverse it makes it obscure.
I probably have 30 CDs in my collection which wouldn't have been heard of of by anyone here solely beacause they are Australian bands. eg. Who here has heard of TISM?
I think even the Australian members (all three of them) would have trouble placing that band with a song name even though they have a career spanning 20 yers with ten albums. I own eight albums/ collections of theirs, does that equal diversity.
Also just knowing about it doesn't mean anything just that you have listened to your dads records alot (by force or by choice), liking it is a different story.
But if I was to say that I had heard of the afore-mentioned song would it mean anything? No.
"I wish I did more drugs,
I wish I slept with more girls,
I wish you'd all go and get fucked."
Jock Cheese
Cardinal.jpg
 
Joined: 30 Jul 2002
Location: Netherlands

Postby madmallard » Sat Apr 05, 2003 10:23 pm

Christopher Cross
Michael mcdonald
Earth wind and fire
RTZ
Storm
Blood sweat and tears
fleetwood mac
Courtney Pine
Dianne Schuur
David Benoit
David Gillingham
johann Demeiji
inxs
Deep Purple
James Brown
Eddy Low
Stevie Wonder
Bernie Jones
Ella Fitzgerald
Benny Goodman
Satchmo
tone loc
oasis
foo fighters


oh yeah and an australian band. . .arent Savage Garden?
User avatar
madmallard
 
Joined: 04 Aug 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status: Cracked up quacker, quacked up cracker

Next

Return to Music Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest